Search

Aim: To compare medication prescriptions for patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) in the real world in Korea and Japan. Methods: This retrospective and descriptive population‐based study was conducted using claims data provided by Health Insurance Review and Assessment in Korea and JMDC Inc in Japan. We defined individuals as KOA patients if they had an International Classification of Diseases 10 (ICD10) code for gonarthrosis (M17) and were ≥50 years old in 2012. Korean and Japanese patients were matched for age and sex using frequency matching. Patients were observed for 1 year from the first month of the ICD10 code M17 in 2012. We described baseline characteristics including prevalence of comorbidities, and use of medication for KOA during the observational period. Results: The median age was 59 and the percentage of women was 61.4 in both countries (N = 1 133 138 in Korea, N = 10 498 in Japan). The prevalence of nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drug (NSAID) usage in Japan (74.7%) was significantly higher than that in Korea (59.0%). Analgesics such as acetaminophen and symptomatic slow‐acting drugs for OA (SYSADOA) were significantly more frequently used in Korea (25.8%) than in Japan (9.4%). Intra‐articular injection (IAI) of corticosteroids or hyaluronic acid was performed more frequently in Japanese patients (57.3%) than Korean patients (30.5%). Conclusions: Medication patterns for KOA in Korea and Japan are described for the first time. Use of NSAIDs and IAI were more common in Japan, while other pain killers and SYSADOA were more commonly prescribed in Korea. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To investigate changes in the risk for serious infections (SIs) over time in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFIs). This prospective cohort study included Japanese RA patients who began treatment with a TNFI from 2005 to 2007 (2005 group, n = 716, 634.2 patient years [PY]) and from 2008 to 2011 (2008 group, n = 352, 270.1 PY) at the time or after their enrollment in the registry of Japanese RA patients on biologics for long-term safety (REAL) database. Patients were observed for 12 months or until discontinuation of their initial TNFI in the REAL database. Drug discontinuation reasons and retention rates were analyzed. Incidence rates of serious adverse events (SAEs) were calculated with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). The Cox proportional hazard model was applied to estimate the risk for SIs. The retention rate in the 2008 group was significantly lower than the 2005 group (p < 0.001). Discontinuation rates due to lack of efficacy or good control for the 2008 group were significantly higher than the 2005 group (p < 0.001). The crude incidence rate ratios comparing the 2008 group with the 2005 group for SAEs were 0.93 (95 % CI 0.65-1.34) and for SIs were 0.50 (0.24-1.03). The 2008 group had significantly lower risk for SIs than the 2005 group after adjusting for covariates (hazard ratio: 0.43 [0.20-0.93]). These results indicate significant decrease of the risk for SIs with TNFI treatment over time; this may be explained by evidence-based risk management of RA patients given TNFIs.

Objective: To compare the incidence and risk factors of serious adverse events (SAEs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with etanercept (ETN) or adalimumab (ADA) between Korean and Japanese registries., Methods: We recruited 416 RA patients [505.2 patient-years (PYs)] who started ETN or ADA from Korean registry and 537 RA patients (762.0 PY) from Japanese registry. The patient background, incidence rate (IR) of SAE in 2 years, and risk factors for SAEs were compared., Results: Korean patients were younger and used more nonbiologic DMARDs, higher doses of methotrexate, and lower doses of prednisolone (PSL). The IR of SAEs (/100 PY) was higher in the Japanese registry compared to the Korean [13.65 vs. 6.73]. In both registries, infection was the most frequently reported SAE. The only significant risk factor for SAEs in Korean registry was age by decade [1.45]. In Japanese registry, age by decade [1.54], previous use of nonbiologic DMARDs ≥ 4 [1.93], and concomitant use of oral PSL ≥ 5 mg/day [2.20] were identified as risk factors for SAEs., Conclusions: The IR of SAE in Japan, especially infection, was higher than that of Korea, which was attributed to the difference of demographic and clinical characteristics of RA patients and treatment profiles.