Search

Background: An administrative database covering a whole population such as the national database in Japan may be used to estimate the nationwide prevalence of diseases including rheumatoid arthritis (RA) when a well-validated definition of the disease is available. In Japan, the record linkage between the administrative database and medical charts in hospitals is strictly prohibited. A "hospital-based" validation study is one of few possible validation studies where claims kept inside the study hospital are rearranged into the database structure., Methods: We selected random samples of 19,734 patients from approximately 1.6 million patients who received medical care between February 2018 and January 2019 in one of the 64 hospitals of the Tokushukai Medical Group. We excluded patients whose observation period was less than 365 days and identified 334 patients who met the definition of "possible cases of RA" whose medical charts were then independently evaluated by two rheumatologists. In a sensitivity analysis, we assessed bias due to misclassifying some patients with RA who did not meet the definition of "possible cases of RA" as a patient with no RA., Results: The kappa coefficient between the two rheumatologists was 0.80. The prevalence of RA in the study population was estimated to be 0.56%. We found that [condition code of RA] and ([any disease-modifying antirheumatic drug] or [oral corticosteroid with no systemic autoimmune diseases (other than RA) and no polymyalgia rheumatica]) had a relatively high sensitivity (approximately 73%) and a high positive predictive value (approximately 80%). In a sensitivity analysis, we found that when some patients with RA who did not meet the definition of "possible cases of RA" were misclassified as a patient with no RA, then this would lead to underestimation of the prevalence of the definition-positive patients and the adjusted prevalence., Conclusions: We recommend using the claims-based definition of RA (found in the current validation study) to estimate the prevalence of RA in Japan. We also suggest estimating the adjusted prevalence using the quantitative bias analysis method, since the prevalence of the disease in the "hospital-based" validation study is different from that in the administrative database., Trial Registration: The current study is not a clinical trial and hence not subject to trial registration.

Objective: To externally validate the performance of the new European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria set for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) with a Japanese cohort., Methods: This study included 420 IIM and 402 non-IIM cases. Probability of having IIM in each patient was calculated using the collected data set. The cut-off probability was set at 55%, as recommended by EULAR/ACR. Patients classified as IIM by the criteria were further subclassified with classification trees., Results: When the probability cut-off was set at 55%, the sensitivity/specificity of the new criteria to diagnose IIM were 89.3%/91.0% in the total cohort, 88.1%/95.1% without muscle biopsy data and 90.4%/65.5% with biopsy data. The cohort included 12 overlap syndrome patients with biopsy data, who were included as non-IIM cases in accordance with traditional Japanese methods. When they were included in the IIM cases, the specificity in patients with biopsy increased to 74.4%. The sensitivity/specificity of the new criteria to diagnose polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM) plus juvenile and amyopathic DM in the Japanese cohort was 87.4%/92.4%, which were greater than those of the Tanimoto's criteria revised to enable classification of amyopathic DM (ADM) (71.2%/87.8%) and were comparable with those of Bohan & Peter's criteria to diagnose those diseases except for ADM (88.4%/88.3%)., Conclusions: Our study externally validated high specificity of the new criteria for the first time, although with several limitations, including low percentage of child patients. The new criteria have higher sensitivity and/or specificity in classification of PM/DM than the previously reported criteria, demonstrating its usefulness for interethnic patients., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: To evaluate the risk of hospitalized infection (HI), cardiovascular disease (CVD), stroke, and fracture in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients compared with non-RA patients using the Japanese health insurance database. Method: Among individuals aged ≥18 years, RA cases were defined to have one RA diagnostic code and receiving ≥1 disease-modifying antirheumatic drug between 2005 and 2013 ( n  = 6,712). Age-, sex-, calendar year of the observation start-, and observation length-matched non-RA cases were selected at 1:5 ( n  = 33,560). Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using the time-dependent Cox regression analysis. Results: Median age of the patients was 52.0 years. The incidence rates of HI, CVD, and fracture in the RA group were 2.42/100 person-years (PY), 4.94/1,000 PY, and 10.59/1,000 PY. The crude incidence rate ratios (95% CI) (RA vs. non-RA) for HI, CVD, and fracture were 2.47 (2.20-2.77), 1.89 (1.49-2.41), and 3.35 (2.80-4.02). The adjusted HR (95% CI) (RA vs. non-RA) was significantly elevated (HI, 1.74 [1.52-1.99], CVD, 1.38 [1.04-1.85], and fracture, 1.88 (1.54-2.31)]. Conclusion: The relatively young RA population had significantly higher risks of these complications than the non-RA, indicating importance of prevention of them even at young ages in clinical settings.

Objective: Dermatomyositis (DM) is an idiopathic inflammatory myopathy which often involves the lungs. DM is likely to be associated with aberrant T- and B-cell activation in the pathogenesis because of the proven effectiveness of T- and B-cell-targeted treatments. Assuming that the aberrant activation is reflected by biases in the lymphocyte subset repertoires, we aimed to elucidate these biases, especially in relation to clinical features of DM., Method: Based on the immunophenotyping standardized by the Human Immunology Project Consortium, untreated 13 DM patients, including seven patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD), and 18 age-matched healthy donors (HDs) were examined for proportions of peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets. Six DM patients were examined before and after successful induction of remission., Results: Naïve CD4 + T cells and naïve B cells were more abundant, while there were fewer naïve CD8 + T cells, central memory CD8 + T cells, effector memory CD4 + T cells, Th1 cells, Tfh cells, and memory B cells in DM patients than in HDs. When the patients were subgrouped according to the presence of ILD, the lymphocyte subset repertoires in the patients with ILD contributed to the statistical differences in all the biased lymphocyte subset proportions. After treatment, transitional B cells vanished and there was an increase in memory B cells., Conclusion: The lymphocyte subset repertoires in the DM patients were biased, and were associated with the presence of ILD and disease activity of DM.

Although rheumatologists, neurologists and dermatologists see patients with polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM), their management appears to vary depending on the physician's specialty. The aim of the present study was to establish the treatment consensus among specialists of the three fields to standardize the patient care. We formed a research team supported by a grant from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan. Clinical questions (CQ) on the management of PM and DM were raised. A published work search on CQ was performed primarily using PubMed. Using the nominal group technique, qualified studies and results in the published work were evaluated and discussed to reach consensus recommendations. They were sent out to the Japan College of Rheumatology, Japanese Society of Neurology and Japanese Dermatological Association for their approval. We reached a consensus in 23 CQ and made recommendations and a decision tree for management was proposed. They were officially approved by the three scientific societies. In conclusion, a multidisciplinary treatment consensus for the management of PM and DM was established for the first time.

Although rheumatologists, neurologists and dermatologists see patients with polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM), their management appears to vary depending on the physician's specialty. The aim of the present study was to establish the treatment consensus among specialists of the three fields to standardize the patient care. We formed a research team supported by a grant from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan. Clinical questions (CQ) on the management of PM and DM were raised. A published work search on CQ was performed primarily using PubMed. Using the nominal group technique, qualified studies and results in the published work were evaluated and discussed to reach consensus recommendations. They were sent out to the Japan College of Rheumatology, Japanese Society of Neurology and Japanese Dermatological Association for their approval. We reached a consensus in 23 CQ and made recommendations and a decision tree for management was proposed. They were officially approved by the three scientific societies. In conclusion, a multidisciplinary treatment consensus for the management of PM and DM was established for the first time., (This article has been co-published with permission in Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience, The Journal of Dermatology and Modern Rheumatology. All rights reserved. © 2018 the Japanese Society of Neurology, the Japanese Dermatological Association and the Japan College of Rheumatology. The articles are identical except for minor stylistic and spelling differences in keeping with each journal's style. Either citation can be used when citing this article.)

Objectives: To understand the current status of adult rheumatology care for patients who had previously had juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) (excluding systemic JIA), and to identify issues interfering with the transition from pediatric to adult care in Japan., Methods: Questionnaire-based survey among 30 adult rheumatologists., Results: Eighty-seven percent of adult rheumatologists responded that they had provided medical care to adults who had had JIA; 44% of them had felt hesitation or anxiety when providing such care. The reasons for this included lack of independence of the patients, lack of knowledge and experience among adult rheumatologists, and lack of preparation for accepting such patients. Many adult rheumatologists believed that the timing of transition from pediatric to adult rheumatology care must be considered based on therapeutic regimens or clinical conditions/disease states, not solely chronological age. A majority of adult rheumatologists showed great interest in transitional care for JIA patients and desired to communicate better with pediatric rheumatologists., Conclusion: Transitional care for JIA patients is not sufficiently developed in Japan. Education and advocate campaign of transitional care is required for adult rheumatologists as well as patients and their parents.

Objective: To evaluate the performance of the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics criteria (SLICC-12) on classifying systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in an uncontrolled multi-centered study with real-life scenario of the patients in Japan., Methods: This study comprised 495 patients with SLE or non-SLE rheumatic diseases and allied conditions from 12 institutes in Japan. Chart review of each patient was performed by the 27 expert rheumatologists and diagnosis of 487 cases reached to the consensus. Value of the SLICC-12 on SLE classification was analyzed comparing with the 1997 revised American College of Rheumatology SLE classification criteria (ACR-97) employing the expert-consented diagnoses., Results: Compared to the ACR-97, the SLICC-12 had a higher sensitivity (ACR-97 vs. SLICC-12: 0.88 vs. 0.99, p < .01) and comparable specificity (0.85 vs. 0.80). The rate of misclassification (0.14 vs. 0.11) or the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (0.863 vs. 0.894) was not statistically different. In the cases that diagnoses corresponded in high rates among experts, both criteria showed high accordance of SLE classification over 85% with the expert diagnoses., Conclusion: Although employment of SLICC-12 for the classification for SLE should be carefully considered, the SLICC-12 showed the higher sensitivity on classifying SLE in Japanese population.

Objectives: To estimate the number of patients with polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM) in Japan and the prevalence rate and incidence rate of the disease., Methods: The electronic database in the nationwide registration system on intractable diseases from 2003 to 2010 was utilized to identify the number of prevalent and incident cases of PM/DM. The electronic data entry rate was used to establish the total number of registered cases., Results: The estimated total number of patients with PM/DM and the prevalence rate in Japan in 2010 were 17,000 and 13.2 per 100,000 population, respectively. The prevalence of PM/DM ranged from 10 to 13 per 100,000 population with a trend toward increasing over time. The incidence of PM/DM was estimated within the range 10-13 per 1,000,000 person-years, except for 2003., Conclusions: We report the prevalence and incidence of PM/DM recently in Japan for the first time at the nationwide population level. Because the prevalence seems to be increasing recently, continued monitoring of these epidemiologic features is required.

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the tolerability of single and multiple doses of abatacept in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Secondary objectives included evaluating its pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and efficacy., Methods: This dose-escalation, single- and multiple-dose, multicenter, open-label study was conducted at nine sites in Japan. Seven patients were enrolled at each of three dose levels (2, 8 and 16 mg/kg) and received a single intravenous dose of abatacept on day 1 of the single-dose phase. The multiple-dose phase, at the same dose, started once the patients had completed the single-dose phase and when it was confirmed that there were no safety issues., Results: Twenty patients started the single-dose phase. Single and multiple doses of abatacept were well tolerated, and adverse events were of mild to moderate intensity. There were no discontinuations or deaths due to adverse events. The pharmacokinetics of abatacept were linear, with no notable accumulation. There were no immunogenic effects on the safety, efficacy, or pharmacokinetics of abatacept. Multiple doses of abatacept improved individual items of the American College of Rheumatology core set., Conclusion: Single and multiple doses of abatacept showed favorable tolerability and efficacy in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe age, gender distribution, and age at onset of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM), and systemic sclerosis (SSc) in Japan., Methods: We used epidemiological information on 21,405, 6,327, and 10,058 patients with SLE, PM/DM, and SSc, respectively, in a Japanese nationwide registration database of patients with intractable diseases., Results: All three diseases occur predominantly in women, with the female-to-male ratio being 8.2:1, 2.6:1, and 7.7:1 for SLE, PM/DM, and SSc, respectively. The most susceptible age for SLE is 15-44 and 20-39 years for males and females, respectively. For PM/DM it is 45-64 and 40-64 years and for SSc, 50-69 and 40-59 for men and women, respectively., Conclusions: The basic descriptive epidemiological characteristics of SLE, PM/DM, and SSc in Japan, such as gender distribution, present age, and age at onset, were surveyed nationwide for fiscal 2007. It was found that these characteristics were similar to those in Western populations. Our finding provides new information on the natural history of disease development.

Background: Although dermatomyositis (DM)-associated facial erythema was noted in the nasolabial folds of Japanese patients, DM-associated facial erythema other than heliotrope rash has drawn little attention in previous studies., Objectives: To characterize phenotypical features and frequencies of erythema, especially those in the seborrheic area of the head, in DM patients., Methods: A retrospective study on skin manifestations in 33 DM patients followed up at our department during the past 15 years was conducted., Results: Macular violaceous erythema (MVE) in the seborrheic area of the face was most frequent (67%). Patients with facial MVE had also MVE in the scalp significantly more frequently than those without facial MVE. The pathology of the facial MVE was dominated by DM-associated changes with slight changes compatible with seborrheic dermatitis (SD)., Conclusions: Japanese DM patients had MVE frequently in the seborrheic area of the head. Its phenotypical features suggested that it might be triggered by SD., (2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.)