Search

The urinary normetanephrine to creatinine ratio (uNMN/Cr) and urinary metanephrine to creatinine ratio (uMN/Cr) are commonly evaluated for the diagnosis of pheochromocytomas (PCC) in dogs. This study aimed to establish reference intervals for uNMN/Cr and uMN/Cr in 56 healthy dogs in Japan and to investigate the effect of urine collection methods on these measurements in 15 non-PCC dogs. The upper limits of reference intervals for uNMN/Cr and uMN/Cr were 124.4 nmol/mmol (90% confidence interval [CI] 107.7-137.0) and 121.1 nmol/mmol (90% CI 102.8-145.1), respectively. Both uNMN/Cr and uMN/Cr were significantly higher when urine was collected in the hospital compared to at home. Several factors, including the method of urine collection, should be considered when utilizing these reference intervals.

The management of blood pressure is a significant concern for surgeons and anesthesiologists performing adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma. We evaluated clinical factors in pheochromocytoma patients to identify the predictors of postoperative hypotension. The medical records of patients who underwent adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma between 2001 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed and clinical and biochemical data were evaluated. Of 29 patients, 13 patients needed catecholamine support in the perisurgical period while 16 patients did not. There were significant differences in median age, tumor size, and blood pressure drop (maxmin) between the 2 groups (68 vs 53 years old, p=0.045; 50 vs 32 mm diameter, p=0.022; 110 vs 71 mmHg, p=0.015 respectively). In univariate logistic analysis, age > 65.5 years, tumor size > 34.5 mm, urine metanephrine > 0.205 mg/day and urine normetanephrine > 0.665 mg/day were significant predictors of prolonged hypotension requiring postoperative catecholamine support. Tumor size and urine metanephrine and urine normetanephrine levels were correlated with postoperative hypotension. These predictors may help in the safe perioperative management of pheochromocytoma patients treated with adrenalectomy., Competing Interests: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Since activation of the sympathetic nervous system is associated with both impaired insulin secretion and insulin resistance, or namely with diabetes, evaluation of such activation in ordinary clinical settings may be important. Therefore, we evaluated the relationships between urinary concentrations of the catecholamine metabolites, urinary normetanephrine (U-NM) and urinary metanephrine (U-M), and glucose metabolism in a general population. From 1,148 participants in the 2016 population-based Iwaki study of Japanese, enrolled were 733 individuals (gender (M/F): 320/413; age: 52.1±15.1), who were not on medication affecting serum catecholamines, not diabetic, and had complete data-set and blood glucose levels appropriate for the evaluation of insulin secretion and resistance, using homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-β and HOMA-R, respectively). Univariate linear regression analyses revealed significant correlations between both U-NM and U-M, and HOMA-β, but adjustment for multiple factors correlated with HOMA indices abolished these (β = -0.031, p = 0.499, and β = -0.055, p = 0.135, respectively). However, the correlation between U-NM and HOMA-R observed using univariate linear regression analysis (β = 0.132, p<0.001) remained significant even after these adjustments (β = 0.107, p = 0.007), whereas U-M did not correlate with HOMA-R. Furthermore, use of the optimal cut-off value of U-NM for the prediction of insulin resistance (HOMA-R >1.6) determined by ROC analysis (0.2577 mg/gCr) showed that individuals at risk had an odds ratio of 2.65 (confidence interval: 1.42-4.97) after adjustment for the same factors used above. Higher U-NM concentrations within the physiologic range are a significant risk factor for increased insulin resistance in a general Japanese population., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

We recently conducted an open-label phase I/II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative and chronic treatment with metyrosine (an inhibitor of catecholamine synthesis) in pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL) in Japan. We compared creatinine-corrected metanephrine fractions in spot urine and 24-hour urine samples (the current standard for the screening and diagnosis of PPGLs) from 16 patients to assess the therapeutic effect of metyrosine. Percent changes from baseline in urinary metanephrine (uMN) or normetanephrine (uNMN) were compared between spot and 24-hour urine samples. Mean percent changes in uMN or uNMN in spot and 24-hour urine were -26.36% and -29.27%, respectively. The difference in the percent change from baseline between uMN or uNMN in spot and 24-hour urine was small (-2.90%). The correlation coefficient was 0.87 for percent changes from baseline between uMN or uNMN measured in spot and 24-hour urine. The area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve of uMN or uNMN measured in spot urine vs. 24-hour urine (reference standard) to assess the efficacy of metyrosine treatment was 0.93. Correlations and ROCs between 24-hour urinary vanillylmandelic acid, adrenaline, and noradrenaline and 24-hour uMN or uNMN were similar to those between spot uMN or uNMN and 24-hour uMN or uNMN. No large difference was observed between spot and 24-hour urine for the assessment of metyrosine treatment by quantifying uMN or uNMN in Japanese patients with PPGLs. These results suggest that spot urine samples may be useful in assessing the therapeutic effect of metyrosine.

Measuring the levels of the plasma free metanephrines (PFMs) represents a recently developed and promising test for the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma in the United States and Europe. As this test has not yet been evaluated in Japan, it is necessary to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of measuring the levels of PFMs compared with the standard measurement of the urinary excretion of metanephrines (uMNs) whose reliability is well established to detect of pheochromocytoma. A total of 101 Japanese subjects clinically suspected of having pheochromocytoma in were included in this study. Subsequently, we prospectively measured the PFMs levels in all patients, compared with those of biochemical markers of the catecholamine secretion and metabolisms in the plasma and urine. All subjects with adrenal tumors underwent tumor excision. Data were available for 84 of the 101 patients, 47 of whom had histopathologically proven pheochromocytoma and 37 were finally diagnosed with non-pheochromocytoma. The results of comparisons in the accuracy of measurement for diagnosis of pheochromocytoma between PFMs and the urinary excretion of metanephrines (uMNs) were 0.980 VS 0.951 for AUC of receiver operatorating characteristic (ROC) curve, 0.957 VS 0.894 for sensitivity, and 0.973 VS 0.946 for specificity, respectively. Although the differences were small, the results of our study definitely demonstrated that measurement of PFMs was not inferior to standard urinary metanephrines (uMNs) measurement, which is established to be the most reliable biochemical method to detect pheochromocytoma. This study clearly shows measuring the PFMs levels to be a reliable and efficient method for diagnosing pheochromocytoma in Japanese patients, as demonstrated in previous reports.