Search

Background Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) reduce the bioavailability of several anticancer drugs. The impact of PPIs co-administered with cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors is controversial. We aimed to clarify whether the concomitant use of PPIs impacts palbociclib and abemaciclib effectiveness in breast cancer treatment. Patients and Methods This multicenter, retrospective, observational study, conducted across 4 medical institutions in Japan, consecutively included patients with endocrine-resistant metastatic breast cancer, receiving palbociclib or abemaciclib between December 2017 and August 2022. Propensity score-matched analyses were performed. Treatment efficacy and safety with and without PPIs were compared. Progression-free survival and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using a log-rank test. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the hazard ratio. Results The study included 240 patients. After 1:1 matching, 112 patients were treated with and without PPIs. The median progression-free survival period was 1.2 years in the PPI group and 1.3 years in the non-PPI group (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.70-2.02). The median overall survival period was 3.6 years in the PPI group, whereas it was not reached in the non-PPI group (hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.61-2.47). Consistent results were obtained for subgroups receiving palbociclib (n  = 177) and abemaciclib (n  = 63) without propensity score matching. Adverse event incidence and severity were similar in both groups. Conclusion The effectiveness of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors is unlikely to be affected by concomitant PPI use. Future prospective pharmacokinetic studies are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The optimal treatment following endocrine therapy (ET) plus a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) has not been established. We aimed to investigate treatment patterns and time to treatment failure (TTF) of subsequent therapy after palbociclib in a Japanese real-world setting. This retrospective observational study used de-identified data of patients with advanced breast cancer treated with palbociclib, using a nationwide claims database (April 2008 to June 2021). Measures included the type of subsequent therapies after palbociclib (endocrine-based therapy: ET alone, ET + CDK4/6i, and ET + mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor [mTORi]; chemotherapy; chemotherapy + ET; and others) and their TTFs. The median TTF and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Of 1170 patients treated with palbociclib, 224 and 235 received subsequent therapies after first- and second-line palbociclib treatment, respectively. Among them, 60.7% and 52.8% were treated with endocrine-based therapies as first subsequent therapy, including ET + CDK4/6i (31.2% and 29.8%, respectively). The median TTF (95% CI) of ET alone, ET + CDK4/6i, and ET + mTORi as first subsequent therapy after first-line palbociclib were 4.4 (2.8–13.7), 10.9 (6.5–15.6), and 6.1 (5.1–7.2) months, respectively. No apparent relationship between the treatment duration of prior ET + palbociclib and subsequent abemaciclib was observed. This real-world study revealed that one-third of the patients received sequential CDK4/6i after ET + palbociclib, and treatment duration of ET + CDK4/6i following ET + palbociclib was the longest among the treatment options. Further data are awaited to determine whether ET + targeted therapy with CDK4/6i and mTORi provides acceptable treatment options following ET + palbociclib. • No optimal treatments after endocrine therapy (ET) + cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) has been established. • This study investigated treatment patterns and treatment duration after palbociclib in a Japanese real-world setting (n = 1170). • More than 60% were treated with endocrine-based therapies after palbociclib, and one-thirds continued ET + CDK4/6i. • ET + CDK4/6i provided the longest treatment duration among treatment options. • ET + targeted therapy may provide acceptable treatment options after palbociclib. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aimed to determine whether the 21-Gene Breast Recurrence Score® assay from primary breast tissue predicts the prognosis of patients with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor 2-negative advanced breast cancers (ABCs) treated with fulvestrant monotherapy (Group A) and the addition of palbociclib combined with fulvestrant (Group B), which included those who had progression in Group A from the Japan Breast Cancer Research Group-M07 (FUTURE trial)., Methods: Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared using the log-rank test and Cox regression analysis based on original recurrence score (RS) categories (Low: 0-17, Intermediate: 18-30, High: 31-100) by treatment groups (A and B) and types of ABCs (recurrence and de novo stage IV)., Results: In total, 102 patients [Low: n = 44 (43.1%), Intermediate: n = 38 (37.5%), High: n = 20 (19.6%)] in Group A, and 45 in Group B, who had progression in Group A were analyzed. The median follow-up time was 23.8 months for Group A and 8.9 months for Group B. Multivariate analysis in Group A showed that low-risk [hazard ratio (HR) 0.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04-0.53, P = 0.003] and intermediate-risk (HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.06-0.78) with de novo stage IV breast cancer were significantly associated with better prognosis compared to high-risk. However, no significant difference was observed among patients with recurrence. No prognostic significance was observed in Group B., Conclusion: We found a distinct prognostic value of the 21-Gene Breast Recurrence Score® assay by the types of ABCs and a poor prognostic value of the high RS for patients with de novo stage IV BC treated with fulvestrant monotherapy. Further validations of these findings are required., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer among women worldwide and in Japan. The majority of breast cancers are hormone receptor–positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2‒), and endocrine therapy is an effective therapy for this type of breast cancer. However, recent substantial advances have been made in the management of HR+/HER2‒ advanced breast cancer (ABC) with the advent of targeted therapies, such as cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors, resulting in significant improvements in survival outcomes versus endocrine therapy alone. To evaluate the optimal use of palbociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, in HR+/HER2– ABC, this review summarizes clinical trial and real-world data for palbociclib. In addition, current biomarker studies in palbociclib clinical research are reviewed. In Japanese patients, palbociclib was shown to be effective with a manageable safety profile, although differences were observed in the frequency of adverse event and dosing parameters. Current evidence supporting palbociclib as a first-line treatment strategy for patients with HR+/HER2‒ ABC in Asia, and specifically japan, is also discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A recent large real-world study conducted in the United States reported the effectiveness of palbociclib plus aromatase inhibitor in HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC). However, local clinical practice and available medical treatment can vary between Japan and Western countries. Thus, it is important to investigate Japanese real-world data. This observational, multicenter study (NCT05399329) reports the interim analysis of effectiveness of palbociclib plus ET as first-line or second-line treatment for HR+/HER2- ABC by estimating real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS) in Japanese routine clinical practice., Methods: Real-world clinical outcomes and treatment patterns of palbociclib plus ET were captured using a medical record review of patients diagnosed with HR+/HER2- ABC who had received palbociclib plus ET in the first-line or second-line treatment across 20 sites in Japan. The primary endpoint was rwPFS; secondary endpoints were OS, real-world overall response rate, real-world clinical benefit rate, and chemotherapy-free survival., Results: Of the 677 eligible patients, 420 and 257 patients, respectively, had received palbociclib with ET as first-line and second-line treatments. Median rwPFS (95% confidence interval) was 24.5 months (19.9-29.4) for first-line and 14.5 months (10.2-19.0) for second-line treatment groups. Median OS was not reached in the first-line group and was 46.7 months (38.8-not estimated) for the second-line group. The 36-month OS rates for de novo metastasis, treatment-free interval (TFI) ≥ 12 months, and TFI < 12 months were 80.2% (69.1-87.7), 82.0% (70.7-89.3), and 66.0% (57.9-72.9), respectively., Conclusion: The addition of palbociclib to ET was effective for treating HR+/HER2- ABC in Japanese routine clinical practice., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Palbociclib is a first-in-class potent oral inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 that was approved in the USA in 2015 and in Japan in 2017. Next-generation abemaciclib was approved in the USA and Japan in 2018. The use of palbociclib results in a high frequency of bone marrow suppression, whereas abemaciclib induces a low frequency of bone marrow suppression, but a high incidence of diarrhea. However, the most appropriate uses for these CDK4/6 inhibitors remain unclear. In this study, we analyzed the efficacy and side-effects associated with the use of palbociclib at our hospital and examined the suitability of palbociclib or abemaciclib. Among 35 patients who used palbociclib at our hospital from December, 2017 to December, 2018, the mean age was 39-83 years. The patients receiving treatment with palbociclib with a combination of drugs included 20 patients (57%) receiving fulvestrant, 8 patients (23%) receiving letrozole, and 7 patients (20%) receiving fulvestrant + LH-RH (leuprorelin). Fourteen patients (40%) had a history of receiving chemotherapy, and 21 patients (60%) had no history of receiving chemotherapy. The number of prior treatment regimens was 0-11 (mean, 2.9). The initial dose of palbociclib was 125 mg for 29 patients (83%) and 100 mg for 6 patients (17%). Partial response, stable disease and progressive disease were achieved in 6 (17%), 19 cases (54%) and 10 cases (29%), respectively. Leukocytopenia was observed in 24 cases, neutropenia was observed in 26 cases, anemia was observed in 13 cases, thrombocytopenia was observed in 15 cases, fatigue was observed in 3 cases and itchy skin was observed in 1 case. When the number of neutrophils prior to palbociclib introduction was <3,000, neutropenia of grade 3 or higher was observed in all cases following palbociclib introduction. Thus, in order to avoid grade 3 or higher neutropenia and to maintain relative dose intensity, abemaciclib treatment may be considered for cases with neutrophils of <3,000 prior to the introduction of a CDK4/6 inhibitor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: An open-label, single-arm, Japanese phase 2 study (J-Ph2) investigated the efficacy and safety of first-line (1L) palbociclib (PAL) + letrozole (LET) in postmenopausal Japanese women with ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC). In the final analysis, median progression-free survival was 35.7 months (95% CI 21.7-46.7); but overall survival (OS) data were immature. Here, we report the findings from a follow-up study of J-Ph2 (NCT04735367) evaluating OS and subsequent therapy in these Japanese women., Methods: Patients (N = 42) who participated in J-Ph2 were enrolled in the OS follow-up study. The primary endpoint was OS and secondary endpoints included type and duration of subsequent therapy., Results: Patients were a median age of 62.5 years; 48% had visceral metastases. At a median follow-up of 89.7 months, the median OS was 85.4 months (95% CI 64.3-not estimable). Median OS was longer in patients with nonvisceral versus visceral metastases (not reached vs 67.3 months), or with treatment-free interval > 12 months versus ≤ 12 months (85.4 vs 45.4 months), or with treatment duration ≥ 24 months versus < 24 months (not reached vs 47.5 months). Of patients who received a first subsequent therapy (81%), most (67%) continued endocrine-based therapy, while 7% received chemotherapy. The median duration of the first subsequent therapy was 8.3 months (95% CI 3.9-12.2), and the median chemotherapy-free survival was 69.1 months (95% CI 24.2-85.4)., Conclusions: In this population of Japanese women with ER+/HER2- ABC, median OS was over 7 years with 1L PAL + LET, supporting the use of 1L PAL + endocrine therapy., Trial Number: NCT04735367., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Aim: To reveal the treatment patterns of palbociclib and complete blood count (CBC) monitoring in a Japanese real-world setting. Materials & methods: Deidentified data of patients with advanced breast cancer who received palbociclib from 2017 to 2020 were examined from a Japanese claims database. Results & conclusion: We identified 1074 patients. Palbociclib was commonly prescribed as second- or later-line treatment in 2017/2018; thereafter its first-line treatment increased. Regardless of treatment lines, fulvestrant was most commonly prescribed in combination with palbociclib (57-66% in the first-third-line), and this finding differed from that in the USA. Most patients initiated palbociclib at 125 mg/day; however, over a half of patients reduced doses within the first 8 weeks. Although CBC was regularly monitored, some patients did not undergo blood tests. Early dose reduction and CBC monitoring should be performed cautiously to minimize safety concern and prevent early treatment discontinuation.

Background/aim: This study investigated the efficacy of continuing cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 and 6 inhibitors in patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2- ) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after disease progression on prior-palbociclib combined with endocrine therapy (ET)., Patients and Methods: This retrospective study based on 25 ER+/HER2- MBC patients reported the efficacy and predictive factors of subsequent-abemaciclib after disease progression on prior-palbociclib., Results: The overall response rate and clinical benefit rate were 16.0% and 44.0%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.3 months. In multivariate analysis, the best overall response (BOR) to prior-palbociclib was the only independent predictive factor for PFS (p=0.015). The median time to chemotherapy was 33.9 months. The median PFS in patients treated with next-line chemotherapy after progression on subsequent-abemaciclib was 6.2 months., Conclusion: BOR to prior-palbociclib was the only independent predictive factor for PFS in ER+/HER2- MBC patients undergoing subsequent-abemaciclib after disease progression on prior-palbociclib., (Copyright © 2022 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: The incidence of breast cancer is rising in Japan, particularly in postmenopausal women. The CDK 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib has demonstrated efficacy in clinical studies in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced/metastatic breast cancer (ABC/MBC). The Ibrance Real World Insights (IRIS) study (NCT03159195) collected real-world data for palbociclib-treated patients in several countries including Japan, where such data are currently scarce., Methods: IRIS was a retrospective chart review study of patients with confirmed HR+/HER2- ABC/MBC receiving palbociclib according to approved indications in real-world clinical practice. In Japan, physicians each abstracted data from patient medical records for up to eight sequential patients treated with palbociclib plus an aromatase inhibitor (P+AI) or fulvestrant (P+F). Outcomes included progression-free rates (PFRs) and survival rates (SRs)., Results: Fifty-eight physicians abstracted data for 170 patients receiving palbociclib in the first (64.1%) or second or later line (35.9%), in combination with AI (51.2%) or fulvestrant (48.8%). Median follow-up was 10.4 months. Most patients were initiated on palbociclib 125 mg/d (P+AI, 63.2%; P+F, 78.3%). PFRs at 12 and 24 months were 76.2% and 52.6%, respectively, for P+AI and 71.6% and 65.6%, respectively for P+F. PFRs at 12 and 24 months were 85.4% and 66.5%, respectively, for first-line palbociclib combinations and 56.4% and 50.7%, respectively, for second- or later-line palbociclib combinations., Conclusions: In this analysis of the Japanese IRIS cohort, outcomes in terms of PFRs and SRs appear to be better with first- versus second or later-line palbociclib, regardless of the endocrine partner., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: In the double-blind, phase 3 PALOMA-2 and PALOMA-3 studies, palbociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) demonstrated significant improvement in progression-free survival versus placebo plus ET in patients with hormone receptor‒positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‒negative advanced breast cancer. This analysis assessed subsequent treatment patterns after palbociclib therapy in Japanese patients enrolled in the PALOMA-2 and PALOMA-3 studies., Methods: PALOMA-2 included postmenopausal women who had not received prior systemic therapy for advanced disease. PALOMA-3 included pre- or postmenopausal women who had progressed on previous ET. Types of subsequent therapy were assessed, and treatment durations of subsequent therapy were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Japanese patients were enrolled in PALOMA-2 (n = 46) and PALOMA-3 (n = 35). In both studies, the most common first subsequent therapy was ET (PALOMA-2, 77% in the palbociclib group and 75% in the placebo group; PALOMA-3, 55% and 43%, respectively), followed by chemotherapy (PALOMA-2, 18% and 8%; PALOMA-3, 32% and 57%). The median (95% CI) duration of first subsequent therapy was 6.4 (2.3‒13.9) months with palbociclib plus letrozole and 6.7 (2.8‒13.0) months with placebo plus letrozole in PALOMA-2 and 3.8 (2.4‒5.7) months with palbociclib plus fulvestrant and 9.7 (1.0‒not estimable) months with placebo plus fulvestrant in PALOMA-3., Conclusions: The types of first subsequent therapy received by Japanese patients in the palbociclib plus ET and placebo plus ET groups were similar. Further evaluation of subsequent therapy data in the real-world setting is warranted considering the small sample size of this analysis.

Palbociclib is a highly selective, reversible, oral inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 that is approved to treat hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. An open-label, single-arm, Japanese phase 2 study was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of palbociclib plus letrozole as first-line treatment in 42 postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. The probability of progression-free survival originally reported at 1 year was 75.0% (90% confidence interval, 61.3-84.4), but median progression-free survival was not attained at the primary analysis. In this report, updated efficacy and safety results with a longer follow-up period are presented. The median duration of treatment in the updated analysis was 33.0 months (range, 1.8-49.2). The probability of progression-free survival at 1 year was 75.6% (90% confidence interval, 62.4-84.7). Median progression-free survival was 35.7 months (95% confidence interval, 21.7-46.7). Objective response rate and disease control rate were 47.6% (95% confidence interval, 32.0-63.6) and 85.7% (95% confidence interval, 71.5-94.6), respectively. Common treatment-related adverse events (all grades; grade 3/4) were neutropenia (100%; 93%), leukopenia (83%; 60%), and stomatitis (76%; 0%). Treatment-related febrile neutropenia was reported in one patient. In general, no clinically meaningful deterioration in health-related quality of life was observed. Palbociclib plus letrozole remained effective and tolerable in Japanese postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer in this updated analysis., (© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background The PALOMA2/3 trials demonstrated prominent efficacy of combination therapy of palbociclib (PAL) and endocrine therapy (ET) compared with monotherapy. PAL was approved for metastatic breast cancer in Japan in 2017. We evaluated the efficacy and safety in practice after approval of PAL in Japan. Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients who newly received PAL at Aichi Cancer Center after Dec 2017. The patients were classified by treatment-line and assessed as follows; clinical benefit rate (CBR) defined as the rate of clinical PR, CR and long SD (more than 6 months) based on physician's judgment, time to failure (TTF) defined as the duration time of PAL, prior ET response, and adverse events (AEs). TTFs were figured with swimmer's plot by treatment-line, PAL doses (125, 100, 75mg/day). Results Between Dec 2017 and Oct 2018, 64 patients were eligible. Median age was 62.5 (37-82). Forty-one patients (64%) had visceral metastasis. PAL was administered for 1st to 3rd line (early-line group) in 52% (n = 33), and for more than 4th line (late-line group) in 48% (n = 31). Combination ETs were aromatase inhibitors (n = 27, 42%), fulvestrant (n = 35, 55%), and tamoxifen (n = 2, 3%). Prior ET was sensitive in 59% (n = 33). The dose reduction was needed in 62% (100mg; n = 19, 75mg; n = 21). Twenty-eight patients (43.8%) were continuing PAL. Overall CBR was 38%. By treatment line, CBR was 51.6% in the early-line group, and 22.6% in the late-line group. Median TTF was 4.6 months (0.2-10.2). There were no significant differences of TTF by treatment-line, prior ET response, and PAL doses. The grade 3-4 hematological toxicity, such as neutropenia and anemia, were observed in 83% (n = 53). Stomatitis, nausea, and fatigue were common, but most of them were grade 1-2. No patients discontinued PAL due to AEs. Conclusions In the clinical setting, PAL was given in many late line-patients who were not eligible for the PALOMA2/3 trials. Its efficacy was not sufficient, although it was feasible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Both palbociclib and abemaciclib are, oral, highly selective inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6, which are proteins involved in cell differentiation and growth. In pivotal phase III trials (PALOMA and MONARCH), they demonstrated a significant improvement in median progression-free survival in combination with a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor in the first-line, and with a fulvestrant in the second-line in hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, respectively. Both palbociclib and abemaciclib were approved, however, ribociclib, the third cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, has not been approved in Japan. The overall benefits from palbociclib and abemaciclib seem to be equivalent. Subsets analyses suggest that clinical benefits of palbociclib are associated with bone-only disease at baseline, no measurable disease, sensitive to previous endocrine therapy and longer disease-free interval. In contrast, additional benefits from abemaciclib in combination with nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant seem to have a relationship with visceral disease, liver metastasis, primary resistant to endocrine therapy, and short treatment-free interval. Abemaciclib induces senescence and apoptosis more than palbociclib does in a time-dependent manner and has potential to produce tumor shrinkage by single use. Neutropenia is more frequent in palbociclib, in contrast, diarrhea, nausea, and liver dysfunction are frequent in abemaciclib. In this review, we provide an overview of the two kinds of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, which were already approved in Japan. These differences might be useful information for the proper use in daily practice., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor palbociclib, in combination with endocrine therapy (ET), significantly prolonged progression-free survival in women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer (HR+/HER2- ABC) in PALOMA-2 and PALOMA-3. Neutropenia and palbociclib dose reductions/interruptions occurred more frequently in the Japanese versus overall populations. We evaluated neutropenia patterns, palbociclib dose management, and clinical responses after dose reduction in Japanese patients in PALOMA-2 and PALOMA-3 and a single-arm Japanese phase 2 study., Methods: PALOMA-2 and the Japanese phase 2 study enrolled postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2- ABC who had not received prior systemic therapy for advanced disease; PALOMA-3 enrolled women with HR+/HER2- ABC, regardless of menopausal status, whose disease had progressed after prior ET. Palbociclib (125 mg/day) was administered 3 weeks on/1 week off. Dose reduction/interruption, cycle delay, tumor response, and laboratory-assessed neutropenia were analyzed in Japanese patients who received palbociclib., Results: A total of 101 Japanese patients received palbociclib + ET. Among Japanese patients in the 3 studies, the frequency of all-grade/grade 3/grade 4 neutropenia was 94%/53%/34%, 100%/69%/21%, and 100%/67%/26%, respectively. Twenty (63%), 28 (67%), and 15 (56%) patients required palbociclib dose reduction. Dose interruption or reduction did not affect palbociclib treatment duration, and durable tumor response was observed despite dose reduction., Conclusion: Neutropenia was manageable with dose modifications, without affecting palbociclib treatment duration or efficacy., Trial Registration: Pfizer (NCT01740427, NCT01684215, NCT01942135).