Search

Aim: Carers may offer valuable insight into the true health status of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This multinational, multi-stakeholder, exploratory study in Australia, China and Japan aimed to enrich our understanding of the role and potential impact of carers on RA management., Method: This study used a 2-phase sequential mixed methods approach involving 3 key stakeholder groups: rheumatologists, RA patients and carers. The first phase involved an in-depth qualitative exploratory survey (n = 30), which informed the development of the subsequent quantitative validation survey (n = 908). In both phases, patients and carers provided self-assessments of disease and support parameters., Results: In the qualitative phase, patients usually understated the amount of physical support required, compared to carers. Rheumatologists underestimated the amount of physical and emotional care required, compared to carers and patients; however, in the quantitative phase, rheumatologists overestimated the level of support provided by carers. Levels of support provided by carers increased as disease severity increased. Active participation of carers in clinical consultations and treatment decision-making was deemed important by 55% of all patients and 82% of all carers. All stakeholders believed carers' insights into the physical and emotional conditions of patients were useful and should be considered in clinical decision-making. Over 95% of rheumatologists reported soliciting input from the carer., Conclusion: Carers provide valuable input that can give clinicians greater insight into the patients' physical and emotional states, and treatment adherence. Development of standardized carer-reported outcomes that correlate with patient-reported outcomes and clinical parameters will ensure clinical meaningfulness and external validity., (© 2020 The Authors. International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases published by Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Aim: To determine characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Japan who received the same biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) for at least 6 months and to identify factors associated with successful down-titration of bDMARDs dependent on shared decision-making., Methods: We included consecutive RA patients who received the same bDMARD with low disease activity or remission for at least 6 months in our two university hospitals. Patients treated with the bDMARD standard dose were defined as SD, while those treated with bDMARD down-titration were defined as DT. We retrospectively reviewed clinical charts and compared data between the two groups., Results: Of 288 patients with RA, 204 (70.8%) and 84 (29.2%) continued standard dose treatment and underwent down-titration treatment, respectively. Sixty-six of 84 (78.6%) down-titration-treated patients continued to show low disease activity or remission, whereas 18 (21.4%) relapsed 18.9 ± 24.4 months after bDMARD down-titration was started. Univariate predictor analysis showed that the probable factors of down-titration were no history of bDMARD treatment (P = .001) and low initial Disease Activity Assessment of 28 joint score (P = .048). Other clinical characteristics had no significant relationship with successful down-titration., Conclusions: Thus, bDMARD-naïve patients and those with low initial disease activity are more likely to agree to attempt down-titration. However, the timing and method of down-titration should be made in shared decision-making between patients and rheumatologists., (© 2019 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Objectives: To understand the current status of adult rheumatology care for patients who had previously had juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) (excluding systemic JIA), and to identify issues interfering with the transition from pediatric to adult care in Japan., Methods: Questionnaire-based survey among 30 adult rheumatologists., Results: Eighty-seven percent of adult rheumatologists responded that they had provided medical care to adults who had had JIA; 44% of them had felt hesitation or anxiety when providing such care. The reasons for this included lack of independence of the patients, lack of knowledge and experience among adult rheumatologists, and lack of preparation for accepting such patients. Many adult rheumatologists believed that the timing of transition from pediatric to adult rheumatology care must be considered based on therapeutic regimens or clinical conditions/disease states, not solely chronological age. A majority of adult rheumatologists showed great interest in transitional care for JIA patients and desired to communicate better with pediatric rheumatologists., Conclusion: Transitional care for JIA patients is not sufficiently developed in Japan. Education and advocate campaign of transitional care is required for adult rheumatologists as well as patients and their parents.