Search

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the predominant histologic subtype of esophageal cancer worldwide. Measurements of circulating inflammation‐related biomarkers may inform etiology or provide noninvasive signatures for early diagnosis. We therefore examined levels of inflammation molecules for associations with ESCC risk. Using a case–cohort study designed within the Japan Public Health Center‐based Prospective Study, we measured baseline plasma levels of 92 biomarkers using a multiplex assay in a subcohort of 410 randomly selected participants and 66 participants with incident ESCC (including four cases that occurred in the subcohort). ESCC hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for 2–4 quantiles of each biomarker by Cox proportional hazards regression models with age as the time metric, adjusted for sex, smoking and alcohol use. Twenty analytes were undetectable in nearly all samples. Of the remaining 72, 12 biomarkers (FGF19, ST1A1, STAMBP, AXIN1, CASP8, NT3, CD6, CDCP1, CD5, SLAMF1, OPG and CSF1) were associated with increased ESCC risk (ptrend < 0.05) with HRs per quantile 1.28–1.65. Seven biomarkers (CXCL6, CCL23, CXCL5, TGFA, CXCL1, OSM and CCL4) were inversely associated with HRs 0.57–0.72. FGF19, CASP8, STAMBP, ST1A1 and CCL‐4 met statistical significance with false discovery rate correction. Associations did not differ <5 vs. ≥5 years between blood collection and ESCC diagnosis. CASP8, STAMBP and ST1A1 were strongly correlated (p < 0.05). Our study expands the range of inflammation molecules associated with the development of this highly lethal neoplasia. Correlations among these novel biomarkers suggest a possible shared pathway. These findings need replication and could further delineate ESCCs molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis. What's new?: Chronic inflammation has long been considered an important contributor to carcinogenesis. Circulating levels of inflammation‐related biomarkers may thus provide valuable information regarding cancer etiology, and may eventually aid in the early diagnosis of some cancers. In this study, the authors identified five such proteins that are associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) risk. These biomarkers may improve our understanding of ESCC etiology, enhance non‐invasive, molecular diagnostic panels, and may provide potential therapeutic targets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gastric cancer is preceded by a chronic inflammatory process. Circulating levels of inflammation-related markers may reveal molecular pathways contributing to cancer development. Our study evaluated risk associations of gastric cancer with a wide range of systemic soluble inflammation and immune-response proteins. We performed a case-cohort analysis within the JPHC Study II, including a subcohort of 410 participants selected randomly within defined age and sex groups, and 414 individuals with incident gastric cancer. Ninety-two biomarkers were measured in baseline plasma using proximity extension assays. Gastric cancer multivariable hazard ratios were calculated for two to four quantiles used as ordinal variables of each biomarker by Cox proportional hazards regression models with age as the time metric. Of 73 evaluable biomarkers, three (CCL11, CCL20 and IL17C) were associated with increased gastric cancer risk and two (CCL23 and MMP1) with reduced cancer risk (P trends < 0.05). However, no association was statistically significant after a false discovery rate correction. This study largely expands the range of inflammation molecules evaluated for gastric cancer risk but failed to identify novel associations with this neoplasia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Previous prospective studies of associations between circulating inflammation-related molecules and pancreatic cancer risk have included limited numbers of markers., Methods: We conducted a case-cohort study nested within the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study Cohort II. We selected a random subcohort ( n = 774) from a total of 23,335 participants aged 40 to 69 years who returned a questionnaire and provided blood samples at baseline. During the follow-up period from 1993 to 2010, we identified 111 newly diagnosed pancreatic cancer cases, including one case within the subcohort. Plasma concentrations of 62 inflammatory markers of chemokines, cytokines, and growth factors were measured by a Luminex fluorescent bead-based assay. Cox regression models were applied to estimate HR and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for pancreatic cancer risk for quartiles of marker levels adjusted for potential confounders., Results: The HR (95% CI) for the highest versus the lowest category of C-C motif ligand chemokine 8/monocyte chemoattractant protein 2 (CCL8/MCP2) was 2.03 (1.05-3.93; P trend = 0.048). After we corrected for multiple comparisons, none of the examined biomarkers were associated with pancreatic cancer risk at P -value <0.05., Conclusions: We found no significant associations between 62 inflammatory markers and pancreatic cancer risk., Impact: The suggestive association with circulating levels of leukocyte recruiting cytokine CCL8/MCP2 may warrant further investigation., (©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a systemic inflammatory state. Low physical activity (PA) could modify this patho-physiology or act as an independent contributor to inflammation. Previous studies of both conditions have identified altered levels of inflammation- and immune-related proteins based on limited sets of candidate markers., Methods: We investigated associations of MetS and low PA with circulating inflammation markers in a stratified random sample of Japanese adults ( N = 774, mean age 60.7 years) within the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study (JPHC) Cohort II. AHA/NHLBI criteria were used to define MetS (19%) and the bottom quartile of PA was considered low. 110 circulating biomarkers, including cytokines, chemokines, and soluble receptors were measured by multiplex bead-based and proximity-extension assays. Associations of MetS and low PA with marker quantiles were adjusted for each other and for age, sex, study site, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and blood sample fasting state by ordinal logistic regression. P values were corrected for FDR., Results: MetS was significantly associated with levels of six markers: IL18R1 [odds ratio 2.37; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.45-3.87], CRP (2.07; 95% CI, 1.48-2.90), SAP (2.08; 95% CI, 1.47-2.95), CCL19/MIP3β (2.06; 95% CI, 1.48-2.88), CXCL12/SDF1α+β (0.48; 95% CI, 0.32-0.65), and CCL28 (0.44; 95% CI, 0.27-0.71). Low PA had no significant marker associations., Conclusions: Positively associated markers with MetS are mostly Th1 immune response-related and acute phase proteins, whereas negatively associated markers are generally Th2-related., Impact: MetS is associated with a broad range of alterations in immune and inflammatory biomarkers that may contribute to risks of various chronic diseases, independent of low PA., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Circulating inflammation proteins may be important mediators or markers of carcinogenic mechanisms. There have been few studies with limited numbers of analytes in patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract tumors. We therefore evaluated risk associations of gastric and esophageal cancers with prediagnostic levels of a wide range of these molecules., Methods: We performed a case-cohort analysis within the Japan Public Health Center-Based Prospective Study Cohort II, including incident cases of gastric ( n = 446) and esophageal ( n = 68) cancers and a random subcohort ( n = 774). A total of 64 biomarkers were measured in baseline plasma using Luminex bead-based assays. The median time between blood collection and diagnosis was 8.1 years for gastric cancer and 9.4 years for esophageal cancer. HRs for association with each marker were adjusted for potential confounders using Cox regression., Results: In separate models, sEGFR and TSLP were nominally associated with gastric cancer risk, and CRP, CXCL11/ITAC, and CCL15/MIP1D were associated with esophageal cancer. However, no association satisfied statistical significance after FDR correction. Associations did not differ by time from blood collection to cancer (<5 vs. ≥5 years)., Conclusions: Our study failed to identify associations of circulating inflammation markers with risk of upper GI tract tumors., Impact: To date, this is the largest assessment of inflammation-related proteins with gastric and esophageal cancer risks. However, the evaluated molecules may not fully represent the complex inflammation processes preceding malignant transformation. Further investigation of other markers in prospective studies is warranted, as demonstration of associations may have important implications for prevention and treatment of these cancers., (©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Blood levels of inflammation-related markers may reveal molecular pathways contributing to carcinogenesis. To date, prospective associations with colorectal cancer (CRC) risk have been based on few studies with limited sets of analytes. We conducted a case-cohort study within the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study Cohort II, comparing 457 incident CRC cases during median 18 years follow-up with a random subcohort of 774 individuals. Baseline plasma levels of 62 cytokines, soluble receptors, acute-phase proteins, and growth factor markers were measured using Luminex bead-based assays. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) associating each marker with CRC risk by Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for potential confounders. Subanalyses compared cases by years after blood draw (<5 vs. ≥5) and anatomical subsite (colon vs. rectum). Linear trends in quantiles of four C-C motif ligand (CCL) chemokines, one C-X-C motif ligand (CXCL) chemokine, and a soluble receptor were nominally associated with CRC risk based on p trend < 0.05, but none met false discovery rate corrected statistical significance. HRs for the 4th vs. 1st quartile were: 1.69 for CCL2/MCP1, 1.61 for soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 2, 1.39 for CCL15/MIP1D, 1.35 for CCL27/CTACK, 0.70 for CXCL6/GCP2 and 0.61 for CCL3/MIP1A. Among cases diagnosed 5+ years after enrollment, CCL2/MCP1, CCL3/MIP1A and CXCL6/GCP2 retained nominal statistical significance. There were no significant differences in associations between colon and rectum. Our findings implicate chemokine alterations in colorectal carcinogenesis, but require replication for confirmation. Noninvasive chemokine assays may have potential application in colorectal cancer screening and etiologic research., (© 2018 UICC.)