Search

Patients with high bleeding risk (HBR) are often treated with abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to reduce bleeding risk, however this strategy is associated with an increase in ischemic events, especially if the acute PCI result is suboptimal. We compared clinical outcomes among patients with HBR treated with 1-month DAPT who underwent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)- or optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided PCI versus those who underwent angiography-guided PCI without intravascular imaging. The Onyx ONE Clear study includes patients with HBR from the Onyx ONE US/Japan and Onyx ONE randomized studies who were treated with the Resolute Onyx zotarolimus-eluting stent. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiac death (CD) or myocardial infarction (MI) between 1 month and 2 years after PCI. Propensity-score adjustments and matching were performed for differences in baseline and procedural characteristics between groups. Among the 1507 patients in Onyx ONE Clear, 271 (18.0 %) had IVUS or OCT used during PCI (Imaging-guided group) and 1236 (82.0 %) underwent Angiography-guided PCI (Angio-guided group). Imaging-guided patients were less likely to present with atrial fibrillation, acute coronary syndrome, and left ventricle ejection fraction ≤35 %. Conversely, Imaging-guided patients were more likely to have complex (ACC/AHA type B2/C), longer, and heavily calcified lesions. Between 1 month and 2 years, the composite rate of CD or MI was similar between Imaging-guided and Angio-guided patients (9.9 % vs. 12.4 %, P = 0.33). There was also no difference between groups after adjustment; (P = 0.56). However, CD was significantly lower among Imaging-guided patients (2.7 % vs. 6.1 %, P = 0.048). There were no between-group differences in MI or stent thrombosis. Propensity score matching results were similar. Despite higher lesion complexity, using intravascular imaging guidance for PCI between 1-month and 2-years follow-up had comparable outcomes with angiographic guidance alone in patients with HBR treated with 1-month DAPT. (ClinicalTrials.gov : Identifier: NCT03647475 and NCT03344653). BARC: Bleeding Academic Research Consortium; DAPT: dual antiplatelet therapy; DES: drug-eluting stent; HBR: high bleeding risk; IVUS: intravascular ultrasound; OCT: optical coherence tomography; SAPT: single antiplatelet therapy. • Balancing ischemic and bleeding risks after PCI remains challenging in HBR patients. • Imaging-guided HBR patients had more complex legions. • Outcomes were similar using imaging vs. angio-guided PCI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: In this article, the way that the Instructor of Esophageal Speech (IES) works is considered from an interactive-analytic perspective., Methods: The observation project data were gathered during 6 months in 2004 at the training sessions of the Ginreikai-Asian Federation of Laryngectomees' Association using the Six Category Intervention Analysis framework (6CIA) by a trained communication specialist as an active-observer., Results: Mean scores of each of the six categories and a series of percentage distributions were extracted from the usage-frequency data and interpreted together with the results of Chi-square analysis of usage-frequency units. We found the IES used more frequently authoritative categories and used less facilitative categories. Our results of the data analysis show that the 30 IES used more authoritative interventions and used more frequently the prescription and information giving than the confrontation or cathartic interventions., Conclusion: The results of the present study show that the 6CIA framework has its potential and value as an analytic tool to explore the IES' actual behavior in a specific therapy related context., Practice Implications: We argue for the utility of the 6CIA as an analytic framework to investigate the interpersonal behavior of the IES in the Japanese cultural setting.