1. Phase 3 THOR Japanese subgroup analysis: erdafitinib in advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer and fibroblast growth factor receptor alterations.
- Author
-
Matsubara N, Miura Y, Nishiyama H, Taoka R, Kojima T, Shimizu N, Hwang J, Ote T, Oyama R, Toyoizumi K, Mukhopadhyay S, Triantos S, Deprince K, and Loriot Y
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Aged, Middle Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Pyrazoles therapeutic use, Urologic Neoplasms drug therapy, Urologic Neoplasms pathology, Receptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Japan, Progression-Free Survival, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Carcinoma, Transitional Cell drug therapy, Carcinoma, Transitional Cell secondary, Adult, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms drug therapy, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms pathology, Mutation, East Asian People, Quinoxalines therapeutic use
- Abstract
Background: In the THOR trial (NCT03390504) Cohort 1, erdafitinib demonstrated significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) (median 12.1 versus 7.8 months) and reduced risk of death by 36% (hazard ratio 0.64, P = 0.005) compared with chemotherapy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients with FGFR alterations who progressed after ≥ 1 prior treatments, including anti-PD-(L)1. There have been no reports of the Japanese subgroup results yet., Methods: THOR Cohort 1 randomized patients to erdafitinib once daily or docetaxel/vinflunine once every 3 weeks. Primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). No specific statistical power was set for this Japanese subgroup analysis., Results: Of 266 patients randomized, 27 (14 erdafitinib; 13 chemotherapy) were Japanese. Baseline characteristics were generally similar between treatments and to the overall population, except for more males, lower body weight, and more upper tract primary tumors among Japanese patients. Compared with chemotherapy, erdafitinib showed improved OS (median 25.4 versus 12.4 months), PFS (median 8.4 versus 2.9 months) and ORR (57.1% versus 15.4%). Any grade treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in all patients from both arms but Grade 3/4 AEs and AEs leading to discontinuation were lower in the erdafitinib arm. No new safety signals were observed in the Japanese subgroup., Conclusion: In the Japanese subgroup, erdafitinib showed improved survival and response compared to chemotherapy, with no new safety concerns. These results support erdafitinib as a treatment option for Japanese mUC patients with FGFR alterations, and early FGFR testing after diagnosis of mUC should be considered., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF