Search

There is a paucity of effective systemic therapy options for patients with advanced, chemotherapy-refractory colorectal cancer. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib, a highly selective and potent oral inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs) 1, 2, and 3, in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer. We conducted an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study (FRESCO-2) at 124 hospitals and cancer centres across 14 countries. We included patients aged 18 years or older (≥20 years in Japan) with histologically or cytologically documented metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma who had received all current standard approved cytotoxic and targeted therapies and progressed on or were intolerant to trifluridine–tipiracil or regorafenib, or both. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive fruquintinib (5 mg capsule) or matched placebo orally once daily on days 1–21 in 28-day cycles, plus best supportive care. Stratification factors were previous trifluridine–tipiracil or regorafenib, or both, RAS mutation status, and duration of metastatic disease. Patients, investigators, study site personnel, and sponsors, except for selected sponsor pharmacovigilance personnel, were masked to study group assignments. The primary endpoint was overall survival, defined as the time from randomisation to death from any cause. A non-binding futility analysis was done when approximately one-third of the expected overall survival events had occurred. Final analysis occurred after 480 overall survival events. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04322539 , and EudraCT, 2020-000158-88, and is ongoing but not recruiting. Between Aug 12, 2020, and Dec 2, 2021, 934 patients were assessed for eligibility and 691 were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive fruquintinib (n=461) or placebo (n=230). Patients had received a median of 4 lines (IQR 3–6) of previous systemic therapy for metastatic disease, and 502 (73%) of 691 patients had received more than 3 lines. Median overall survival was 7·4 months (95% CI 6·7–8·2) in the fruquintinib group versus 4·8 months (4·0–5·8) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·66, 95% CI 0·55–0·80; p<0·0001). Grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 286 (63%) of 456 patients who received fruquintinib and 116 (50%) of 230 who received placebo; the most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in the fruquintinib group included hypertension (n=62 [14%]), asthenia (n=35 [8%]), and hand-foot syndrome (n=29 [6%]). There was one treatment-related death in each group (intestinal perforation in the fruquintinib group and cardiac arrest in the placebo group). Fruquintinib treatment resulted in a significant and clinically meaningful benefit in overall survival compared with placebo in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. These data support the use of fruquintinib as a global treatment option for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Ongoing analysis of the quality of life data will further establish the clinical benefit of fruquintinib in this patient population. HUTCHMED. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Fruquintinib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor Inhibitor, Is a new anticancer drug independently developed in China to treat refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In Japan, regorafenib combined with nivolumab has been demonstrated to be promising in patients with refractory mCRC. Here, in a real-world study, we were aimed to evaluate the efficacy of fruquintinib with various programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors after standard treatment in Chinese non-microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair proficient mCRC patients. Methods: A total of 45 patients with refractory mCRC were involved in the study. They received fruquintinib (3 or 5 mg, orally administered once a day for 3 weeks followed by 1 week off in 4-week cycles) and a PD-1 inhibitor(200 mg pembrolizumab, 3 mg/kg nivolumab, 200 mg sintilimab or camrelizumab, intravenously administered on D1 once every 3 weeks). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and objective response rate (ORR) were reviewed and evaluated. Results: Among the 45 patients, the median age was 54 years (29-85). The ORR was 11.1% (5/45), DCR 62.2% (28/45), median PFS equal 3.8 months, and median OS was 14.9 months. The response duration was 3.4 months. PFS between left and right primary tumors and PFS with or without lung metastases were both not significantly different (p > 0.05), which was inconsistent with the result of REGONIVO study. The multivariate analysis indicated no association of OS benefit in the specified subgroups. No adverse-effect-related deaths were reported. Conclusions: Fruquintinib, in combination with anti-PD-1, was observed to have clinical activity in a small population of patients with heavily pretreated mCRC in our center. Further studies are needed to verify this outcome in a large population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In the phase III open-label KEYNOTE-426 (NCT02853331) study, first-line pembrolizumab and axitinib improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) versus sunitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). KEYNOTE-426 evaluated patients enrolled from 25 sites in Japan. Methods: Patients enrolled in Japan were included in this post hoc subgroup analysis. Adults with clear cell mRCC were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks plus oral axitinib 5 mg twice daily or oral sunitinib 50 mg once daily (4 weeks on/2 weeks off). Dual primary endpoints were OS and PFS as assessed by blinded independent central review. Objective response rate (ORR) and safety were secondary endpoints. Results: The Japanese subgroup comprised 94 patients (pembrolizumab–axitinib, n = 44; sunitinib, n = 50; 11% of the intent-to-treat population). Median time from randomization to data cutoff (January 6, 2020) was 29.5 months (range 24.6–37.3). Consistent with the intent-to-treat population, the OS, PFS, and ORR suggested improvement with pembrolizumab–axitinib versus sunitinib in the Japanese subgroup. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 70% of patients receiving pembrolizumab–axitinib versus 78% receiving sunitinib; 11 (25%) patients receiving pembrolizumab–axitinib and 13 (27%) patients receiving sunitinib discontinued the study medication due to AEs. TRAEs led to the discontinuation of pembrolizumab, axitinib, pembrolizumab–axitinib, or sunitinib in 32%, 34%, 14%, and 20%, respectively. No deaths from TRAEs occurred. Conclusions: Efficacy outcomes for the Japanese subgroup were consistent with those of the global population. Safety in Japanese patients was consistent with the results from the global population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lenvatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor used against nonoperative thyroid cancer; however, hypertension is a major dose‐limiting side effect. In this study, hypertension caused by lenvatinib was described through a novel population pharmacodynamic model using postmarketing surveillance data obtained in Japan. The model consists of two maximum effect model components based on the (1) concentration of lenvatinib in plasma and (2) cumulative area under the curve of lenvatinib. In addition, antihypertensive drug of either an angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker or calcium channel blocker accounted for by lowering effect on diastolic blood pressure. Based on virtual simulations, the combination of antihypertensive drug and dose adjustment of lenvatinib showed a reduction in the probability of grade greater than or equal to 3 hypertension. The present model provides useful guidance in managing hypertension during treatment with lenvatinib in the real‐world setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is diagnosed frequently in elderly people, and about 50% of people newly diagnosed with kidney cancer are aged 75 yeas or older in Japan. The survival of metastatic RCC has significantly extended in the last decade by the drugs such as vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors. A systematic review published from the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) in 2009 suggested that both survival benefit and frequency and severity of toxic effect of systemic therapy for metastatic RCC did not differ according to age. However, this result should be interpreted with caution because the systematic review included the small number of elderly patients and they could be healthier than elderly people in the real world. Therefore, it is important for physician to treat each elderly patient carefully exploiting their clinical expertise and considering patients preference. Here, we review and discuss about physiological, pharmacological, immunological, phycological and social factors which potentially influences the efficacy and toxicity of systemic therapy for elderly patients with metastatic RCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]