Search

Introduction: Treatment options in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) failing ibrutinib are limited, with no standard therapies defined. This study aimed to investigate real-world treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with MCL following ibrutinib.Methods: This study utilized a de-identified hospital-based claims database (Medical Data Vision) in Japan. Eligible patients were adults who were diagnosed with MCL and had received antitumor drugs between December 2010 and July 2020. Patients were followed from the first antitumor drug treatment until the end of available data up to July 2021. Time-to-event analyses utilized the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors for receiving post-ibrutinib therapy were explored with logistic regression analysis.Results: Of the 1386 patients who started antitumor drug therapy, 247 patients received and discontinued ibrutinib at any line of therapy. Among them, 137 patients (55.5%) received subsequent therapy. The median age at the end of ibrutinib therapy was 77 (range 42-95), and 44 patients had a dependent activity of daily living (ADL). Factors negatively associated with receiving post-ibrutinib therapy after discontinuation of ibrutinib were age ≥ 75 years (odds ratio [95% CI] 0.46 [0.26-0.80]) and emergency hospital admissions (0.37 [0.17-0.84]). Immediate post-ibrutinib therapy regimens were highly diverse, with BR (bendamustine, rituximab) only prescribed in more than 10% of patients. The median duration of post-ibrutinib therapy was 1.5 months (95% CI 1.07-2.07). The median overall survival from the end of ibrutinib therapy in patients regardless of the receipt of post-ibrutinib therapy (n = 247), in those who did not receive post-ibrutinib therapy (n = 110), and in those who received post-ibrutinib therapy (n = 137) was 5.6 months (95% CI 3.8-8.7), 2.3 months (95% CI 1.2-3.9), and 8.7 months (95% CI 5.6-13.8), respectively. The most common adverse event during post-ibrutinib therapy was infection, with the use of anti-infectives (17%).Conclusions: Patients with MCL previously treated with ibrutinib have poor ability to carry out ADL and experience very poor outcomes. New safe, effective therapies are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is an autologous chimeric antigen receptor T-cell based anti-CD19 therapy. The ZUMA-1 study, multicenter, single-arm, registrational Phase 1/2 study of axi-cel demonstrated high objective response rate in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma. Here, we present the results of the bridging study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of axi-cel in Japanese patients (JapicCTI-183914). Methods: This study was the phase 2, multicenter, open-label, single-arm trial. Following leukapheresis, axi-cel manufacturing and lymphodepleting chemotherapy, patients received a single infusion of axi-cel (2.0 × 106 cells/kg). Bridging therapy between leukapheresis and conditioning chemotherapy was not allowed. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. Results: Among 17 enrolled patients, 16 received axi-cel infusion. In the 15 efficacy evaluable patients, objective response rate was 86.7% (95% confidence interval: 59.5–98.3%); complete response/partial response were observed in 4 (26.7%)/9 (60.0%) patients, respectively. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 16 (100%) patients—most commonly neutropenia (81.3%), lymphopenia (81.3%) and thrombocytopenia (62.5%). Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 13 (81.3%) patients (12 cases of grade 1 or 2 and 1 case of grade 4). No neurologic events occurred. Two patients died due to disease progression, but no treatment-related death was observed by the data-cutoff date (October 23, 2019). Conclusion: The efficacy and safety of axi-cel was confirmed in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma who have otherwise limited treatment options. Trial registration: JapicCTI-183914. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Efficacy and safety data for ibrutinib in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) were limited at the time of its approval in Japan. All-case post-marketing surveillance was conducted in Japanese R/R MCL patients who began ibrutinib treatment between December 2016 and December 2017, and patients were followed until 30 June 2020. In the effectiveness analysis set (n = 202), the overall response rate was 59.9%, 52-week progression-free survival was 47.5%, and overall survival was 69.3%. Safety was assessed in 248 patients (median age 74.0 years). When ibrutinib treatment was started, patients had received a median of three prior lines of therapy. The overall incidence of adverse events (AE) was 74.6%, and AE frequency and severity grade distribution were similar between patients with 1 versus more than 1 prior line of therapy. The most common AE was platelet count decreased (all grades; 10.4%), similarly to previous observations in patients with R/R chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma. Five patients (2.0%) developed atrial fibrillation. The effectiveness and safety of ibrutinib were consistent with its known profile at approval in Japan. These results suggest that ibrutinib is effective and safe in Japanese R/R MCL patients in routine clinical practice., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Despite high response rates to initial therapy, most patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) experience relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease. Here, we report the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of the Phase 2, single-arm M20-075 study (NCT04477486) of ibrutinib and venetoclax combination therapy in Japanese patients with R/R MCL., Methods: Patients received 560 mg ibrutinib and 400 mg venetoclax (after a 5-week ramp-up from 20 mg) once daily for up to 104 weeks. Primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate by independent review committee (IRC). Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety including dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) assessment in the first six patients, and pharmacokinetic parameters. Full analysis set (FAS) comprised all treated patients. Per protocol set (PPS) excluded treated patients with non-evaluable disease at baseline by IRC., Results: Thirteen patients were treated (FAS n = 13; PPS, n = 12). Median age was 71 years, patients had a median of two prior treatments. After a median follow-up of 9.6 months, IRC-assessed CR rate and ORR were both 83% (PPS). All six MRD-evaluable patients had uMRD. Median DOR, PFS, and OS were unreached. The most common Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was neutropenia (23%); 1 patient discontinued due to squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. No DLTs, tumor lysis syndrome, or deaths related to TEAEs were observed., Conclusion: Ibrutinib plus venetoclax exhibited high response rates and a well-tolerated safety profile in Japanese patients with R/R MCL., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

A Phase II, multicenter clinical trial of bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) regimen was conducted in previously untreated patients with high-tumor-burden indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) and previously untreated elderly patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) in Japan. Bendamustine 90 mg/m2/day on days 1 and 2, as well as rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 were administered intravenously up to six cycles. The primary endpoint was the complete response (CR) rate as assessed by the International Workshop Response Criteria (1999). Sixty-nine patients (59 with indolent B-NHL and 10 with MCL) were treated. The median number of delivered cycles was six (range 1-6). The CR rates were 67.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 54.4-79.4%] and 70.0% (95% CI 34.8-93.3%) for indolent B-NHL and MCL, respectively. Estimated progression-free survival at 30 months was 72.1% (95% CI 58.5-82.0%) in indolent B-NHL and was 67.5% (95% CI 29.1-88.2%) in MCL. Major grade 3/4 toxicities were hematologic and included lymphopenia (97%), CD4 lymphopenia (91%), neutropenia (86%), and leukopenia (83%). No treatment-related death was found. The BR regimen showed high efficacy as evidenced by the expected CR rate and durable response, as well as an acceptable safety profile for the study populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mantle cell lymphoma ( MCL) is essentially incurable with conventional chemotherapy. The MCL International Prognostic Index ( MIPI) is a validated specific prognostic index, but was derived from patients with advanced-stage disease primarily in the pre-rituximab era. We analysed 501 MCL patients (median age, 67 years; range 22-90) treated with rituximab-containing chemotherapy, and evaluated the prognostic factors adjusted by the treatment. Five-year overall survival ( OS) in the low, intermediate and high MIPI groups was 74%, 70% and 35%, respectively. Additional to MIPI risk factors, multivariate analysis revealed that low serum albumin and bone-marrow involvement were also significantly associated with a poor outcome. The revised- MIPI (R- MIPI) was constructed using six factors, namely age, performance status, white blood cell count, serum lactate dehydrogenase, bone-marrow involvement and serum albumin, which is divided into four prognostic groups. Five-year OS in low, low-intermediate (L-I), high-intermediate (H-I) and high R- MIPI groups was 92%, 75%, 61% and 19%, respectively. Hazard ratio for OS of L-I, H-I and high risk to low risk patients were 5·4, 8·3 and 33·0, respectively. R- MIPI, a new prognostic index with easy application to the general patient population, shows promise for identifying low- and high-risk MCL patients in the rituximab era. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) accounts for approximately 3% of all cases of malignant lymphoma in Japan. The CLIMBER-DBR (Treatment practices and patient burden in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and mantle cell lymphoma patients in the real world: An observational database research in Japan) study examined the clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and healthcare resource utilization of MCL in a real-world clinical setting in Japan. Using the Japanese Medical Data Vision database, we extracted data for 1130 patients with MCL (ICD-10 code C83.1) registered between March 1, 2013 and February 28, 2018. The date of first MCL diagnosis was taken as the index date. The mean (standard deviation) age, body weight, and modified Charlson Comorbidity Index were 71.4 (10.9) years, 58.3 (11.7) kg, and 1.9 (1.6), respectively, and 24.6% were ≤65 years old. The median follow-up period was 654 days (first-third quartile 290.5 E049 days). A total of 802 patients (71.0%) underwent first-line treatment. The most common first-line treatment was bendamustine/rituximab (BR; 27.8%), followed by rituximab/cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisolone (R-CHOP; 15.6%) and rituximab/tetrahydropyranyl-adriamycin/cyclophosphamide/vincristine/prednisolone (R-THP-COP; 6.5%). The median (95% confidence interval) times to initial (first-line), second-line, and third-line treatments were 45 (36 E2), 687 (624 E34), and 1188 (1099 E444) days, respectively. Treatment practices for MCL in Japan are consistent with trends observed in Western countries. Our study can serve as a benchmark to assess future MCL treatments in Japan.

Bendamustine plus rituximab (B-R) is an effective therapy for relapsed or refractory (r/r) low-grade B-cell lymphoma (LGBCL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL); however, clinical data from Japanese patients treated with B-R therapy are limited. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of B-R therapy in 42 patients who received B-R therapy at our hospital for r/r LGBCL and MCL. All patients received intravenous (IV) ritux-imab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 and IV bendamustine 90 mg/m2 on days 2 and 3 every 28 days for up to 6 cycles. The common histologic subtypes were follicular lymphoma (n = 29, 70%), marginal zone lymphoma (n = 6, 14%), and MCL (n = 5, 12%). The overall response rate was 93%, with 62% complete response and complete response unconfirmed. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 38 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 24.6 to not reached [NR]), and the median overall survival (OS) was 80 months (95% CI, 60.7 to NR). Patients receiving a cumulative dose of bendamustine ≥ 720 mg/m2 showed a significantly longer PFS and OS. Grade 3/4 adverse events (≥ 10%) included neutropenia (55%), lymphopenia (69%), and nausea (24%). B-R therapy was effective and well tolerated, and the cumulative dose of bendamustine was associated with a favorable outcome., Competing Interests: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

This multicenter, open-label, phase I study assessed the safety and antitumor activity of acalabrutinib in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell malignancies. Parts 1 (dose confirmation) and 2 (dose expansion) of this three-part study are reported. Treatment was a single dose of 100 mg acalabrutinib (day 1), followed by a washout period and then twice daily 100 mg acalabrutinib in part 1, or twice daily 100 mg acalabrutinib in part 2. Patients from parts 1 and 2 with r/r chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), and r/r mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) were assessed as r/r CLL/SLL and r/r MCL cohorts, respectively. Twenty-five patients received treatment (part 1, n = 6). Median age was 71.0 years. Nine (one patient from part 1) and 13 (two patients from part 1) patients were included in the r/r CLL/SLL and r/r MCL cohorts, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 88% of patients (grade ≥3, 36%); the most common were headache (28%) and purpura (24%), both grade 1/2. No AEs resulted in treatment discontinuation or death. Median duration of treatment was 31, 20, and 7 months for part 1, r/r CLL/SLL cohort, and r/r MCL cohort, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 89% and 62% for the r/r CLL/SLL and r/r MCL cohorts, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached for the r/r CLL/SLL cohort and was 7 months for the r/r MCL cohort. Acalabrutinib (100 mg twice daily) was generally safe and well-tolerated in adult Japanese patients with B-cell malignancies., (© 2021 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Background: Central nervous system (CNS) relapse is an uncommon but challenging complication in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Survival after CNS relapse is extremely poor. Identification of high-risk populations is therefore critical in determining patients who might be candidates for a prophylactic approach., Patients and Methods: A total of 608 patients (median age, 67 years; range 22-92) with MCL newly diagnosed between 1994 and 2012 were evaluated. Pretreatment characteristics and treatment regimens were evaluated for their association with CNS relapse by competing risk regression analysis., Results: None of the patients received intrathecal prophylaxis. Overall, 33 patients (5.4%) experienced CNS relapse during a median follow-up of 42.7 months. Median time from diagnosis to CNS relapse was 20.3 months (range: 2.2-141.3 months). Three-year cumulative incidence of CNS relapse was 5.6% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3.7% to 8.0%]. Univariate analysis revealed several risk factors including blastoid variant, leukemic presentation, high-risk MCL International Prognostic Index and high Ki-67 (proliferation marker). Multivariate analyses revealed that Ki-67 ≥ 30 was the only significant risk factor for CNS relapse (hazard ratio: 6.0, 95% CI 1.9-19.4, P = 0.003). Two-year cumulative incidence of CNS relapse in patients with Ki-67 ≥ 30 was 25.4% (95% CI 13.5-39.1), while that in the patients with Ki-67 < 30 was 1.6% (95% CI 0.4-4.2). None of the treatment modalities, including rituximab, high-dose cytarabine, high-dose methotrexate or consolidative autologous stem-cell transplant, were associated with a lower incidence of CNS relapse. Survival after CNS relapse was poor, with median survival time of 8.3 months. There was no significant difference in the survival by the site of CNS involvement., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)