Search

Introduction: Head and neck malignancy treatment often involves invasive surgeries, necessitating effective postoperative pain control. However, chronic reliance on opioid medications remains a challenge for many patients after surgery. Multimodal analgesia (MMA) within enhanced recovery after surgery protocols has shown success in limiting narcotic pain medications for other cancer types. In a prior study, MMA comprising acetaminophen, ketorolac, gabapentin, and a neurogenic block reduced opioid use in the 7‐day postoperative period for major head and neck reconstructive surgery. This study investigates the impact of multimodal analgesia on opioid prescription and pain during the 6‐week postoperative period for patients undergoing major head and neck oncologic surgeries, aiming to understand the longer‐term effects of narcotic use. Methods: The study retrospectively examined participants in a [hybrid type 1 effectiveness‐implementation pragmatic trial to assess multimodal analgesia's long‐term effectiveness in head and neck free flap surgery. Arm A received scheduled acetaminophen and as‐needed opioids, while Arm B received scheduled gabapentin, ketorolac, a regional nerve block at the donor site, scheduled acetaminophen, and as‐needed opioids. Retrospective data collection included opioid prescription use and pain scores up to 6 weeks after surgery, gathered from the Kansas prescription drug monitoring program, K‐TRACS. Results: Thirty patients participated, 14 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B. The average morphine milligram equivalents per day of filled prescriptions were not significantly different between Arm A and Arm B (7.23 vs. 7.88, p =.845). Additionally, average pain scores at 6 weeks showed no significant difference between the two groups (1.4 vs. 1.9, p =.612). Conclusion: Patients with head and neck cancer treated with multimodal analgesia during the perioperative period did not exhibit significant differences in opioid use and pain within 6 weeks after discharge. To confirm these findings, a re‐examination with strict measures of opioid use and scheduled pain assessments in a prospective manner is warranted. Level of Evidence: 4. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]