1. The efficacy of limited endoscopic sphincterotomy plus endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for removal of large bile duct stones.
- Author
-
Kuo, Chung-Mou, Chiu, Yi-Chun, Liang, Chih-Ming, Wu, Cheng-Kun, Lu, Lung-Sheng, Tai, Wei-Chen, Kuo, Yuan-Hung, Wu, Keng-Liang, Chuah, Seng-Kee, and Kuo, Chung-Huang
- Subjects
BILE ducts ,CALCULI ,MEDICAL balloons ,THERAPEUTICS ,DISEASE complications ,URETEROSCOPY ,DUODENUM surgery ,CATHETERIZATION ,CLINICAL trials ,GALLSTONES ,PATHOLOGICAL physiology ,DISEASE relapse ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,RETROSPECTIVE studies ,ENDOSCOPIC gastrointestinal surgery - Abstract
Background: The removal of large bile duct stones (> 15 mm) by conventional endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) and endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) can be challenging, requiring mechanical lithotripsy (ML) in addition to EST or EPBD. The primary complication of ML is basket and stone impaction, which can lead to complications such as pancreatitis and cholangitis. The present study aims to investigate the efficacy of limited EST plus endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EST-EPLBD) for large bile duct stone extraction with an extent of cutting < 1/2 the length of the papillary mound.Methods: We enrolled 185 patients with ≥15 mm bile duct stones who received EST, EPLBD and limited EST-EPLBD treatment from January 1, 2010 to February 28, 2018, at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (Kaohsiung, Taiwan). All patients were categorized into three groups: EST group (n = 31), EPLBD group (n = 96), and limited EST-EPLBD group (n = 58). The primary outcome variables were the success rate of complete stone removal and complications.Results: The limited EST-EPLBD group exhibited a higher success rate of the first-session treatment compared with the EST and EPLBD groups (98.3% vs. 83.9% vs. 86.5%; P = 0.032) but required a longer procedure time (32 (12-61) min vs. 23.5 (17-68) min vs. 25.0 (14-60) min; P = 0.001). The need for ML during the procedure was 4 (12.9%) in the EST group, 10 (10.4%) in the EPLBD group and 2 (3.4%) in the limited EST-EPLBD group. Post-procedure bleeding in the EST group was more common than that in the limited EST-EPLBD group (9.7% vs. 0%; P = 0.038). Furthermore, dilated bile duct was the only risk factor for bile duct stone recurrence in the limited EST-EPLBD group.Conclusions: Limited EST-EPLBD exhibits a higher success rate but requires marginally longer procedure time for the first-session treatment. Furthermore, dilated bile duct is the only risk factor for bile duct stone recurrence in patients undergoing limited EST-EPLBD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF