Search

Purpose: To characterize the 3D imaging performance and radiation dose for a prototype slot‐beam configuration on an intraoperative O‐arm™ Surgical Imaging System (Medtronic Inc., Littleton, MA) and identify potential improvements in soft‐tissue image quality for surgical interventions. Methods: A slot collimator was integrated with the O‐arm™ system for slot‐beam axial CT. The collimator can be automatically actuated to provide 1.2° slot‐beam longitudinal collimation. Cone‐beam and slot‐beam configurations were investigated with and without an antiscatter grid (12:1 grid ratio, 60 lines/cm). Dose, scatter, image noise, and soft‐tissue contrast resolution were evaluated in quantitative phantoms for head and body configurations over a range of exposure levels (beam energy and mAs), with reconstruction performed via filtered‐backprojection. Qualitative imaging performance across various anatomical sites and imaging tasks was assessed with anthropomorphic head, abdomen, and pelvis phantoms. Results: The dose for a slot‐beam scan varied from 0.02–0.06 mGy/mAs for head protocols to 0.01–0.03 mGy/mAs for body protocols, yielding dose reduction by ∼1/5 to 1/3 compared to cone‐beam, owing to beam collimation and reduced x‐ray scatter. The slot‐beam provided an ∼6–7× reduction in scatter‐to‐primary ratio (SPR) compared to the cone‐beam, yielding SPR ∼20–80% for head and body without the grid and ∼7–30% with the grid. Compared to cone‐beam scans at equivalent dose, slot‐beam images exhibited an ∼2.5× increase in soft‐tissue contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) for both grid and gridless configurations. For slot‐beam scans, a further ∼10–30% improvement in CNR was achieved when the grid was removed. Slot‐beam imaging could benefit certain interventional scenarios in which improved visualization of soft tissues is required within a fairly narrow longitudinal region of interest (±7 mm in z)––for example, checking the completeness of tumor resection, preservation of adjacent anatomy, or detection of complications (e.g., hemorrhage). While preserving existing capabilities for fluoroscopy and cone‐beam CT, slot‐beam scanning could enhance the utility of intraoperative imaging and provide a useful mode for safety and validation checks in image‐guided surgery. Conclusions: The 3D imaging performance and dose of a prototype slot‐beam CT configuration on the O‐arm™ system was investigated. Substantial improvements in soft‐tissue image quality and reduction in radiation dose are evident with the slot‐beam configuration due to reduced x‐ray scatter. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Intraoperative imaging plays an increased role in support of surgical guidance and quality assurance for interventional approaches. However, image quality sufficient to detect complications and provide quantitative assessment of the surgical product is often confounded by image noise and artifacts. In this work, we translated a three‐dimensional model‐based image reconstruction (referred to as "Known‐Component Reconstruction," KC‐Recon) for the first time to clinical studies with the aim of resolving both limitations. Methods: KC‐Recon builds upon a penalized weighted least‐squares (PWLS) method by incorporating models of surgical instrumentation ("known components") within a joint image registration–reconstruction process to improve image quality. Under IRB approval, a clinical pilot study was conducted with 17 spine surgery patients imaged under informed consent using the O‐arm cone‐beam CT system (Medtronic, Littleton MA) before and after spinal instrumentation. Volumetric images were generated for each patient using KC‐Recon in comparison to conventional filtered backprojection (FBP). Imaging performance prior to instrumentation ("preinstrumentation") was evaluated in terms of soft‐tissue contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) and spatial resolution. The quality of images obtained after the instrumentation ("postinstrumentation") was assessed by quantifying the magnitude of metal artifacts (blooming and streaks) arising from pedicle screws. The potential low‐dose advantages of the algorithm were tested by simulating low‐dose data (down to one‐tenth of the dose of standard protocols) from images acquired at normal dose. Results: Preinstrumentation images (at normal clinical dose and matched resolution) exhibited an average 24.0% increase in soft‐tissue CNR with KC‐Recon compared to FBP (N = 16, P = 0.02), improving visualization of paraspinal muscles, major vessels, and other soft‐tissues about the spine and abdomen. For a total of 72 screws in postinstrumentation images, KC‐Recon yielded a significant reduction in metal artifacts: 66.3% reduction in overestimation of screw shaft width due to blooming (P < 0.0001) and reduction in streaks at the screw tip (65.8% increase in attenuation accuracy, P < 0.0001), enabling clearer depiction of the screw within the pedicle and vertebral body for an assessment of breach. Depending on the imaging task, dose reduction up to an order of magnitude appeared feasible while maintaining soft‐tissue visibility and metal artifact reduction. Conclusions: KC‐Recon offers a promising means to improve visualization in the presence of surgical instrumentation and reduce patient dose in image‐guided procedures. The improved soft‐tissue visibility could facilitate the use of cone‐beam CT to soft‐tissue surgeries, and the ability to precisely quantify and visualize instrument placement could provide a valuable check against complications in the operating room (cf., postoperative CT). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]