1. Comparison of Kato–Katz, PCR and coproantigen for the diagnosis of Taenia solium taeniasis.
- Author
-
Lightowlers, Marshall W., Mananjara, Diana Edithe Andria, Rakotoarinoro, Mihajamanana, Rakotoarison, Valisoa C., Raliniaina, Modestine, Rasamoelina-Andriamanivo, Harentsoaniaina, Gauci, Charles G., Jabbar, Abdul, Mwape, Kabemba E., Donadeu, Meritxell, Ramiandrasoa, Noromanana Sylvia, and Nely, Jose Alphonse
- Subjects
TAENIA solium ,THEILERIA ,MITOCHONDRIAL RNA ,POLYMERASE chain reaction ,RIBOSOMAL RNA ,DNA sequencing - Abstract
Four methods were compared for the diagnosis of human taeniasis caused by Taenia solium. Fecal samples from persons living in a T. solium endemic region of Madagascar were examined for taeniid eggs by the Kato–Katz method. Subsequently, samples positive (n = 16) and negative (n = 200) for T. solium eggs were examined by (i) amplification of the fragment of small subunit of the mitochondrial ribosomal RNA (rrn S) gene using conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and (ii) a nested PCR of a fragment of the T. solium Tso31 gene. Additionally, 12 egg-positive and all egg-negative samples were tested for coproantigen detection. A further 9 egg-positive fecal samples were examined using both PCRs. Of the 12 egg-positive samples tested by PCRs and coproantigen methods, 9 (75%) were positive by rrn S PCR, 3 (25%) using Tso31 -nested PCR and 9 (75%) by coproantigen testing. None of the 200 egg-negative fecal samples was positive in either rrn S or Tso31 -nested PCR. Twenty of the 25 egg-positive samples (80%) were positive in rrn S PCR, and DNA sequencing of PCR amplicons was obtained from 18 samples, all confirmed to be T. solium. Twelve of the 25 egg-positive samples (48%) were positive in the Tso31 -nested PCR, all of which were also positive by rrn S PCR. It is suggested that species-specific diagnosis of T. solium taeniasis may be achieved by either coprological examination to detect eggs or coproantigen testing, followed by rrn S PCR and DNA sequencing to confirm the tapeworm species in egg-positive or coproantigen-positive samples. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF