Search

Malawi has not yet transitioned from the use of wood to more sustainable and efficient means of energy production. This aggravates the already dire problem of deforestation and contributes to severe fuelwood scarcity. The rural sellers of fuelwood, whose livelihoods depend upon access to the commodity, are particularly incentivized to find means of stabilizing their supply. Although agroforestry fuelwood technology (AFT) options such as private and communal woodlots are available for increasing sustainable supplies, Malawians largely have not adopted them. This study investigates the use of agroforestry in general, and AFT in particular, by rural fuelwood sellers in Malawi through analysis of survey results gathered during a large-scale agroforestry extension effort. The findings indicate that fuelwood sellers are 125% and 43% more likely to use AFT than the general population in the North and South regions of the country, respectively. Moreover, binary regression showed that the use of AFT in particular was directly related to the ability to sell fuelwood in the South (i.e., increasing its likelihood by 4.5 times). Based on the findings, the authors propose that for Malawi and similarly situated countries, household composition should be considered in policy and extension recommendations. Communal woodlots may be promoted for the general population in patrilocal areas with high numbers of female-headed households or particularly weak tenure scenarios, while individual woodlots within broader agroforestry prescriptions may be preferred for male-headed households. For both situations, the role of agroforestry in improving environmental conditions and thereby increasing future output levels should be emphasized. • Fuelwood sellers are 125% & 43% more likely to use agroforestry than others in the North & South Malawi • Tenure scenarios, gender, and perceptions of agroforestry fuelwood technology's environmental benefits affect its adoption • Individual woodlots within broader agroforestry prescriptions may be preferred by male-headed households • It may be beneficial to promote communal woodlots to female headed households [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]