Search

Background: In May 2022, the first case of monkeypox virus (MPXV) infection in the United States in the current global outbreak was identified. As part of the public health and health care facility response, a contact tracing and exposure investigation was done., Objective: To describe the contact tracing, exposure identification, risk stratification, administration of postexposure prophylaxis (PEP), and exposure period monitoring for contacts of the index patient, including evaluation of persons who developed symptoms possibly consistent with MPXV infection., Design: Contact tracing and exposure investigation., Setting: Multiple health care facilities and community settings in Massachusetts., Participants: Persons identified as contacts of the index patient., Intervention: Contact notification, risk stratification, and symptom monitoring; PEP administration in a subset of contacts., Measurements: Epidemiologic and clinical data collected through standard surveillance procedures at each facility and then aggregated and analyzed., Results: There were 37 community and 129 health care contacts identified, with 4 at high risk, 49 at intermediate risk, and 113 at low or uncertain risk. Fifteen health care contacts developed symptoms during the monitoring period. Three met criteria for MPXV testing, with negative results. Two community contacts developed symptoms. Neither met criteria for MPXV testing, and neither showed disease progression consistent with monkeypox. Among 4 persons with high-risk exposures offered PEP, 3 elected to receive PEP. Among 10 HCP with intermediate-risk exposures for which PEP was offered as part of informed clinical decision making, 2 elected to receive PEP. No transmissions were identified at the conclusion of the 21-day monitoring period, despite the delay in recognition of monkeypox in the index patient., Limitation: Descriptions of exposures are subject to recall bias, which affects risk stratification., Conclusion: In a contact tracing investigation involving 166 community and health care contacts of a patient with monkeypox, no secondary cases were identified., Primary Funding Source: None.

The early phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and ongoing efforts for mitigation underscore the importance of universal travel and symptom screening. We analyzed adherence to documentation of travel and symptom screening through a travel navigator tool with clinical decision support to identify patients at risk for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome.

Importance: Antibiotics are frequently prescribed for suspected pneumonia, but overdiagnosis is common and fixed regimens are often used despite randomized trials suggesting it is safe to stop antibiotics once clinical signs are normalizing., Objective: To quantify potential excess antibiotic prescribing by characterizing antibiotic use relative to patients' initial clinical signs and subsequent trajectories., Design, Setting, and Participants: An observational cohort study was conducted in 2 tertiary and 2 community hospitals in Eastern Massachusetts. All nonventilated adult patients admitted between May 1, 2017, and July 1, 2018 (194 521 hospitalizations), were included., Main Outcomes and Measures: Identification of all antibiotic starts for possible community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) or hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) per clinicians' stated indications. Potential excess antibiotic prescribing was quantified by characterizing the frequency of patients in whom all clinical signs were within reference ranges on the first day of antibiotic therapy and by how long antibiotic therapy was continued after all clinical signs were normal, including postdischarge antibiotics., Results: Among 194 521 hospitalizations, 9540 patients were treated for possible CAP (4574 [48.0%] women; mean [SD] age, 67.6 [17.0] years) and 2733 for possible HAP (1211 [44.3%] women; mean [SD] age, 66.7 [16.2] years). Temperature, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and white blood cell count were all within reference ranges on the first day of antibiotics in 1779 of 9540 (18.6%) episodes of CAP and 370 of 2733 (13.5%) episodes of HAP. Antibiotics were continued for 3 days or longer after all clinical signs were normal in 3322 of 9540 (34.8%) episodes of CAP and 1050 of 2733 (38.4%) episodes of HAP. Up to 24 978 of 71 706 (34.8%) antibiotic-days prescribed for possible pneumonia may have been unnecessary., Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, almost one-fifth of hospitalized patients treated for pneumonia did not have any of the cardinal signs of pneumonia on the first day of treatment and antibiotics were continued for 3 days or longer after all signs were normal in more than a third of patients. These observations suggest substantial opportunities to improve antibiotic prescribing.

Importance: Hospital-acquired pneumonia is the most common health care-associated infection in the United States. Most cases occur in nonventilated patients, but many hospitals track hospital-acquired pneumonia only in ventilated patients because of the complexity and subjectivity of conducting surveillance for large numbers of nonventilated patients., Objective: To propose and assess potentially objective, efficient, and reproducible surveillance definitions for nonventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia (NV-HAP) using routine clinical data stored in electronic health record systems., Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was conducted in 2 tertiary referral and 2 community hospitals in Massachusetts between May 31, 2015, and July 1, 2018. All nonventilated patients aged 18 years or older who were admitted to these hospitals were included (N = 310 651)., Exposures: Ten candidate definitions for NV-HAP based on clinically meaningful combinations of 6 potential surveillance criteria were proposed: worsening oxygenation, temperature higher than 38 °C (fever), abnormal white blood cell count of less than 4000/μL or more than 12 000/μL, performance of chest imaging, submission of respiratory specimen for culture, and 3 or more days of new antibiotics., Main Outcomes and Measures: Incidence rates, lengths of stay, hospital mortality rates, and odds ratios (ORs) for time to discharge and mortality compared with those of matched controls were calculated for each candidate definition. The ORs were adjusted for demographics, clinical service, comorbidities, and severity of illness., Results: The study analyzed 310 651 patients with 489 519 admissions, including 205 054 patients with 311 484 admissions of 3 or more days. Among the patients with 311 484 admissions, the mean (SD) patient age was 58.3 (19.3) years and 176 936 (56.8%) were of women. Incidence rates for candidate definitions per 100 admissions ranged from 3.4 events for worsening oxygenation alone to 0.9 event for worsening oxygenation and at least 3 days of new antibiotics to 0.6 event for worsening oxygenation, at least 3 days of new antibiotics, fever, abnormal white blood cell count, and performance of chest imaging. Crude mortality rates ranged from 16.1% (n = 2643) for patients with worsening oxygen alone to 27.7% (n = 868) for patients with worsening oxygenation, at least 3 days of antibiotics, fever or abnormal white blood cell count, and chest imaging. Patients who met NV-HAP candidate definitions remained in the hospital for twice as long as their matched controls (adjusted ORs ranged from 1.8 [95% CI, 1.7-1.8] to 2.1 [95% CI, 2.0-2.1]) and were 4 to 6 times as likely to die in the hospital (adjusted ORs ranged from 3.8 [95% CI, 3.5-4.0] to 6.5 [95% CI, 5.2-8.2]). Agreement between candidate definitions and clinical diagnoses was fair (κ = 0.33)., Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that objective surveillance for NV-HAP using electronically computable definitions that incorporate common clinical criteria is feasible and generates incidence, mortality, and adjusted ORs for hospital mortality similar to estimates from manual surveillance. These definitions have the potential to facilitate widespread, automated surveillance for NV-HAP and thus inform the development and evaluation of prevention programs.

OBJECTIVETo validate a system to detect ventilator associated events (VAEs) autonomously and in real time.DESIGNRetrospective review of ventilated patients using a secure informatics platform to identify VAEs (ie, automated surveillance) compared to surveillance by infection control (IC) staff (ie, manual surveillance), including development and validation cohorts.SETTINGThe Massachusetts General Hospital, a tertiary-care academic health center, during January-March 2015 (development cohort) and January-March 2016 (validation cohort).PATIENTSVentilated patients in 4 intensive care units.METHODSThe automated process included (1) analysis of physiologic data to detect increases in positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2); (2) querying the electronic health record (EHR) for leukopenia or leukocytosis and antibiotic initiation data; and (3) retrieval and interpretation of microbiology reports. The cohorts were evaluated as follows: (1) manual surveillance by IC staff with independent chart review; (2) automated surveillance detection of ventilator-associated condition (VAC), infection-related ventilator-associated complication (IVAC), and possible VAP (PVAP); (3) senior IC staff adjudicated manual surveillance-automated surveillance discordance. Outcomes included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and manual surveillance detection errors. Errors detected during the development cohort resulted in algorithm updates applied to the validation cohort.RESULTSIn the development cohort, there were 1,325 admissions, 479 ventilated patients, 2,539 ventilator days, and 47 VAEs. In the validation cohort, there were 1,234 admissions, 431 ventilated patients, 2,604 ventilator days, and 56 VAEs. With manual surveillance, in the development cohort, sensitivity was 40%, specificity was 98%, and PPV was 70%. In the validation cohort, sensitivity was 71%, specificity was 98%, and PPV was 87%. With automated surveillance, in the development cohort, sensitivity was 100%, specificity was 100%, and PPV was 100%. In the validation cohort, sensitivity was 85%, specificity was 99%, and PPV was 100%. Manual surveillance detection errors included missed detections, misclassifications, and false detections.CONCLUSIONSManual surveillance is vulnerable to human error. Automated surveillance is more accurate and more efficient for VAE surveillance.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;826-833.

Background: A reported penicillin allergy may compromise receipt of recommended antibiotic prophylaxis intended to prevent surgical site infections (SSIs). Most patients with a reported penicillin allergy are not allergic. We determined the impact of a reported penicillin allergy on the development of SSIs., Methods: In this retrospective cohort study of Massachusetts General Hospital hip arthroplasty, knee arthroplasty, hysterectomy, colon surgery, and coronary artery bypass grafting patients from 2010 to 2014, we compared patients with and without a reported penicillin allergy. The primary outcome was an SSI, as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Healthcare Safety Network. The secondary outcome was perioperative antibiotic use., Results: Of 8385 patients who underwent 9004 procedures, 922 (11%) reported a penicillin allergy, and 241 (2.7%) had an SSI. In multivariable logistic regression, patients reporting a penicillin allergy had increased odds (adjusted odds ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-2.22) of SSI. Penicillin allergy reporters were administered less cefazolin (12% vs 92%; P < .001) and more clindamycin (49% vs 3%; P < .001), vancomycin (35% vs 3%; P < .001), and gentamicin (24% vs 3%; P < .001) compared with those without a reported penicillin allergy. The increased SSI risk was entirely mediated by the patients' receipt of an alternative perioperative antibiotic; between 112 and 124 patients with reported penicillin allergy would need allergy evaluation to prevent 1 SSI., Conclusions: Patients with a reported penicillin allergy had a 50% increased odds of SSI, attributable to the receipt of second-line perioperative antibiotics. Clarification of penicillin allergies as part of routine preoperative care may decrease SSI risk., (© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)