Search

To characterize racial/ethnic disparities in donor oocyte–assisted reproductive technology (ART) nationwide and examine the impact of state insurance mandates on disparities in utilization and outcomes. Retrospective cohort study. Donor oocyte ART cycles in the United States (US). Women who underwent donor oocyte ART in 2014–2016, as reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System. Race/ethnicity of oocyte recipients. Live birth through 1 or more donor oocyte ART cycles in 2014–2016 per recipient. We analyzed 44,033 donor ART cycles performed for 28,157 oocyte recipients, 99.2% (27,919/28,157) of whom were aged 25–54 years. Race/ethnicity data were reported for 61.4% (17,281/28,157) of the recipients. Among recipients aged 25–54 years with race data, 65.8% (11,264/17,128) identified as non-Hispanic White, whereas 58.9% were White among women aged 25-54 in the 2016 US census. In contrast, Black recipients comprised 8.3% of those aged 25–54 years with race data, compared with 13.7% nationwide. Among White recipients, 7.0% (791/11,356) lived in states with donor ART mandates (Massachusetts/New Jersey), compared with 6.5% (93/1,439) of Black recipients, 8.1% (108/1,335) of Hispanic recipients, and 5.8% (184/3,151) of Asian recipients. Black recipients had a higher median age and body mass index and were more likely to have uterine factor infertility. White recipients had the highest cumulative probability of live birth in the nonmandate (64.6%, 6,820/10,565) and mandate (69.5%, 550/791) states, followed by Asian recipients (nonmandate, 63.4% [1,881/2,967]; mandate, 65.2% [120/184]), Hispanic recipients (nonmandate, 60.5% [742/1,227]; mandate, 68.5% [74/108]), and Black recipients (nonmandate, 48.7% [655/1,346]; mandate, 48.4% [45/93]). The multivariable Poisson regression adjusting for donor's age and recipient's age, body mass index, nulliparity, history of recurrent pregnancy loss, diminished ovarian reserve, tubal factor and uterine factor infertility, prior ART treatment, use of preimplantation genetic testing, cumulative number of embryos transferred, use of blastocysts, and frozen-thawed transfers, demonstrated that Black recipients had a lower cumulative probability of a live birth than White recipients (relative risk [RR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77–0.87), as were Hispanic recipients (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.89–0.99) and Asian recipients (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93–0.99). These disparities were not modified by state mandate for donor ART. State mandates for donor oocyte ART in their current forms are insufficient in decreasing racial/ethnic disparities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We previously developed a subfertile comparison group with which to compare outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. In this study, we evaluated whether insurance claims data in the Massachusetts All Payers Claims Database (APCD) defined a more appropriate comparison group. Methods: We used Massachusetts vital records of women who delivered between 2013 and 2017 on whom APCD data were available. ART deliveries were those linked to a national ART database. Deliveries were subfertile if fertility treatment was marked on the birth certificate, had prior hospitalization with ICD code for infertility, or prior fertility treatment. An infertile group included women with an APCD outpatient or inpatient ICD 9/10 infertility code prior to delivery. Fertile deliveries were none of the above. Demographics, health risks, and obstetric outcomes were compared among groups. Multivariable generalized estimating equations were used to calculate adjusted relative risk (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: There were 70,726 fertile, 4,763 subfertile, 11,970 infertile, and 7,689 ART-treated deliveries. Only 3,297 deliveries were identified as both subfertile and infertile. Both subfertile and infertile were older, and had more education, chronic hypertension, and diabetes than the fertile group and less than the ART-treated group. Prematurity (aRR = 1.15–1.17) and birthweight (aRR = 1.10–1.21) were increased in all groups compared with the fertile group. Conclusion: Although the APCD allowed identification of more women than the previously defined subfertile categorization and allowed us to remove previously unidentified infertile women from the fertile group, it is not clear that it offered a clinically significantly improved comparison group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Among infants following ART-treated, subfertile, and fertile deliveries to determine (1) the presence and magnitude of sex differences in health outcomes and (2) whether the presence of sex differences varied among maternal fertility groups. Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis of infants born in Massachusetts (MA) in 2004–2013 who were conceived by ART. The Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System was linked to the Pregnancy to Early Life Longitudinal data system, which links birth certificates to hospital discharge records for MA mothers and infants. Included were singletons born via ART-treated, subfertile, and fertile deliveries. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the association between infant sex and health outcomes, controlling for maternal demographic and health characteristics. Results: A total of 16,034 ART-treated, 13,277 subfertile, and 620,375 fertile singleton live births were included. For all three groups, males had greater odds of being preterm (AOR range 1.15–1.2), having birth defects (AOR range 1.31–1.71), experiencing respiratory (AOR range 1.33–1.35) and neurologic (AOR range 1.24–1.3) conditions, and prolonged hospital stay (AOR range 1.19–1.25) compared to females. The interaction between maternal fertility group and infant sex for all infant outcomes was nonsignificant, denoting that the presence of sex differences among fertile, subfertile, and ART groups did not vary. Conclusion: Sex differences in birth outcomes of infants following ART-treated, subfertile, and fertile deliveries exist but the magnitude of these differences does not vary among these maternal fertility groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Multiple births and first pregnancy are associated with higher preeclampsia risk. It is unknown if the transfer of multiple embryos or first embryo transfer with assisted reproductive technology (ART) is also associated with greater preeclampsia risk. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of IVF clinics and hospitals in Massachusetts. We used linked ART surveillance, birth certificate, and maternal hospitalization discharge data for 21,188 births, considering resident singleton (12,810) and twin (8378) live-births from autologous or donor eggs from 2005 to 2012. We used log binomial and Poisson regression to calculate adjusted relative risks (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between preeclampsia and predictors of preeclampsia. Outcomes were stratified by singleton and twin birth, donor versus autologous cycles, and use of fresh versus cryopreserved embryos. Results: Considering all singleton births, the transfer of multiple embryos increased the risk of preeclampsia [aRR = 1.10 (95% CI: 1.01–1.19)]. Relative risks were greatest for fresh non-donor cycles [aRR = 1.14 (95% CI: 1.03–1.26)]. Vanishing twin and number of prior ART cycles was not associated with preeclampsia among singleton births [aRR = 1.18 (95% CI: 0.91–1.53)], and aRR = 1.01 (95% CI: 0.96–1.05)], respectively. Considering all twin births, the transfer of > 2 embryos increased the risk of preeclampsia [aRR = 1.09 (95% CI: 1.001–1.19)]. Vanishing triplet and number of prior ART cycles were not associated with preeclampsia among twin births [aRR = 0.93 (95% CI: 0.69–1264), and aRR = 0.98 (CI: 0.95–1.02)], respectively. Conclusions: Among ART births, the transfer of more than 1 embryo for singleton gestations and more than 2 embryos for twin gestations increased the risk for preeclampsia diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: We examined the prevalence of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) in Massachusetts (MA) comparing children born via assisted reproductive technology (ART) and children born to women with indicators of subfertility but no ART (Subfertile), to children born to women with neither ART nor indicators of subfertility (Fertile). We assessed the direct, indirect, and total effects of ART and subfertility on ASD among singletons. Methods: This study included 10,147 ART, 8072 Subfertile and 441,898 Fertile MA resident births from the MA Outcome Study of ART (MOSART) database linked with Early Intervention program participation data. ART included fresh in vitro fertilization (IVF), fresh intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and frozen embryo transfer. We estimated the prevalence of ASD by fertility group. We used logistic regression to assess the natural direct effect (NDE), natural indirect effect (NIE) through preterm birth, and total effects of each fertility group on ASD. Results: The NDE indicated that, compared to the Fertile group, the odds of ASD were not statistically higher in the ART (ORNDE 1.07; 95% CI 0.88–1.30), Subfertile (ORNDE 1.11; 95% CI 0.89–1.38), IVF (ORNDE 0.91; 95% CI 0.68–1.22), or ICSI (ORNDE 1.13; 95% CI 0.84–1.51) groups, even if the rate of preterm birth was the same across all groups. The total effect (product of NDE and NIE) was not significant for ART (ORTotal Effect 1.08; 95% CI 0.89–1.30), Subfertile (ORTotal Effect 1.11; 95% CI 0.89–1.38), IVF (ORTotal Effect 0.92; 95% CI 0.69–1.23), or ICSI (ORTotal Effect 1.13; 95% CI 0.84–1.52). Conclusion: Compared to children born to Fertile women, children born to ART, ICSI, or IVF, or Subfertile women are not at increased risk of receiving an ASD diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare neonatal health outcomes after fresh versus frozen ET (FET).Design: Retrospective analysis of a population-based database of linked clinically assisted reproductive technology (ART) data with state vital records. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the association between deliveries from fresh versus FET and adverse health outcomes, controlling for maternal characteristics.Setting: Not applicable.Patient(s): Live-born singleton infants born to Massachusetts women who conceived by fresh or FET after ART using autologous oocytes between July 1, 2004, and December 31, 2013.Intervention(s): None.Main Outcome Measure(s): Preterm birth, low birth weight, neonatal mortality, birth defects, organ system conditions.Result(s): Compared with infants conceived from fresh embryos, those born to mothers who underwent FET were less likely to be small for gestational age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.70) and low birth weight (AOR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88) but more likely to be large for gestational age (AOR = 1.47; 95% CI, 1.26-1.70) and to experience greater odds of infectious disease (AOR = 1.46; 95% CI, 1.03-2.06), respiratory (AOR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.07-1.41), and neurologic (AOR = 1.32; 95% CI, 1.04-1.68) conditions. There were no statistically significant differences in preterm birth, neonatal mortality, birth defects, cardiovascular, hematologic, and gastrointestinal/feeding conditions, and for infants ≥ 35 weeks, no statistically significant differences in prolonged hospital stay (>3 days for vaginal delivery, >5 days for cesarean).Conclusion(s): Compared with infants conceived from fresh ET, those born by FET have higher birth weight but increased odds of infectious disease, hematologic, respiratory, and neurologic abnormalities. These risks should be considered when making decisions on fresh versus FET. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Pre-pregnancy and post-delivery hospitalizations were compared as markers for health among women who conceived using assisted reproductive technology (ART), non-ART medically assisted reproduction (MAR), no treatment (unassisted subfertile), and who were fertile. Methods: We analyzed hospital discharge data linked to Massachusetts birth certificates from 2004 to 2013 within 5 years prior to pregnancy and 8–365 days post-delivery. ART deliveries were linked from a national ART database; MAR deliveries had fertility treatment but not ART; unassisted subfertile women had subfertility but no ART or MAR; and fertile women had none of these. Prevalence of diagnoses during hospitalization was quantified. Multivariable logistic regression models with fertile deliveries as reference were adjusted for maternal age, race, education, year, and plurality (post-delivery only) with results reported as adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Of 170,605 privately insured, primiparous deliveries, 10,458 were ART, 3005 MAR, 1365 unassisted subfertile, and 155,777 fertile. Pre-pregnancy hospitalization occurred in 6.8% and post-delivery in 2.8% of fertile women. Subfertile groups had more pre-pregnancy hospitalizations (AOR, 95% CI: 1.84, 1.72–1.96 ART; 1.41, 1.24–1.60 MAR; 3.02, 2.62–3.47 unassisted subfertile) with endometriosis, reproductive organ disease, ectopic pregnancy/miscarriage, and disorders of menstruation, ovulation, and genital tract being common. Post-delivery hospitalizations were significantly more frequent in the ART (AOR 1.19, 95% CI 1.05–1.34) and unassisted subfertile (1.59, 1.23–2.07) groups with more digestive tract disorders, thyroid problems, and other grouped chronic disease conditions. Conclusions: Greater likelihood of hospitalization in the ART, MAR, and unassisted subfertile groups is largely explained by admissions for conditions associated with subfertility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

What are the perspectives of women's health providers on the use of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for common medical disorders? A cross-sectional 15-question online anonymous survey was conducted of women's health providers specializing in general obstetrics/gynaecology, gynaecologic oncology and infertility at a tertiary care academic institution in Massachusetts, USA. Respondents could answer 'yes', 'no' or 'unsure' to each thematic question. The survey was sent to 1060 providers and 240 providers responded (response rate 22.6%). Overall, 93% of respondents supported the use of PGT for the identification of genetic mutations which lead to childhood-onset disease, 83% supported the use of PGT for chromosomal aneuploidy screening, and 76% supported the use of PGT for cancer-related genetic disorders. Only 1.7% of respondents supported the use of PGT for non-disease-related indications, including sex selection and physical traits. Compared with general obstetrics/gynaecology providers, infertility specialists were more supportive of PGT. In total, 22.5% of respondents reported no prior knowledge of PGT. In a sample of women's health providers across multiple different obstetrics/gynaecology specialties, there was overall support for the use of PGT for a variety of common indications. Infertility specialists were the most supportive, which may reflect the familiarity that these providers have with this procedure. There was an overwhelmingly non-supportive response for the use of PGT for non-disease-related indications. The percentage of medical professionals working in women's health without prior knowledge of PGT (22.5%) was higher than expected, identifying the need for more education regarding the availability and potential indications for this procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Randomized trials of supplementation with antioxidant mixtures during infertility treatment show no benefit on pregnancy or live birth rate. However, the roles of individual antioxidants are poorly understood. We examined the association of baseline intake of vitamins A, C, E, and carotenoids with outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs).Methods: We followed 349 women undergoing a total of 588 ART cycles for infertility treatment at the Massachusetts General Hospital. We assessed antioxidant intakes from food and supplements before treatment using a validated food frequency questionnaire. We used generalized linear mixed models to account for multiple ART cycles per woman while adjusting for confounding.Results: Mean (SD) age and body mass index were 35.1 years (4.0 years) and 24.1 kg/m (4.3 kg/m), respectively. Total intake of vitamins A, C, and E was not associated with the probability of live birth. Women in the highest intake category of β-carotene from foods had a lower probability of live birth than women in the lowest intake quartile (50% vs. 22%; P trend = 0.03); for lutein and zeaxanthin, the probability for the highest intake group was 44% vs. 28% for the lowest. Intake of β-carotene from supplements and intakes of retinol and all other carotenoids were unrelated to live birth rates.Conclusions: We found unexpected inverse associations of β-carotene intake from foods and of lutein and zeaxanthin intake with live birth rates. Within the observed intake ranges, total consumption of vitamins A, C, and E before starting infertility treatment with ART was not associated with live birth rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To estimate smoking prevalence during the year before pregnancy and during pregnancy and adverse outcomes among women who delivered infants with and without assisted reproductive technology (ART) using linked birth certificates (BC) and National ART Surveillance System (NASS) data. Methods: Data were analyzed for 384,390 women and 392,248 infants born in Massachusetts and Michigan during 2008-2009. Maternal smoking prevalence was estimated using smoking indicated from BC by ART status. For ART users, to evaluate underreporting, prepregnancy smoking was estimated from BC, NASS, or both sources. Effect of prenatal smoking on preterm and mean birthweight (term only) for singleton infants were examined by ART status. Results: Maternal smoking prevalence estimates were significantly lower for ART users than nonusers (prepregnancy = 3.2% vs. 16.7%; prenatal = 1.0% vs. 11.1%, p < 0.05). When combining smoking information from BC and NASS, prepregnancy smoking prevalence estimates for ART users could be as high as 4.4% to 6.1%. Adverse effects of smoking on infant outcomes in ART pregnancies were consistent with the effects seen in non-ART pregnancies, specifically decline in infant birthweight and increase in preterm delivery, although association between smoking and preterm was not significant. Conclusion: A low, but substantial proportion of ART users smoked before and during pregnancy. As ART users are highly motivated to get pregnant, it should be clearly communicated that smoking can decrease fertility and adversely affect pregnancy outcomes. Continued efforts are needed to encourage smoking cessation and maintain tobacco abstinence among all women of reproductive age. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Research has shown an association between assisted reproductive technology (ART) and adverse birth outcomes. We identified whether birth outcomes of ART-conceived pregnancies vary across states with different maternal characteristics, insurance coverage for ART services, and type of ART services provided.Methods: CDC's National ART Surveillance System data were linked to Massachusetts, Florida, and Michigan vital records from 2000 through 2006. Maternal characteristics in ART- and non-ART-conceived live births were compared between states using chi-square tests. We performed multivariable logistic regression analyses and calculated adjusted odds ratios (aOR) to assess associations between ART use and singleton preterm delivery (<32 weeks, <37 weeks), singleton small for gestational age (SGA) (<5th and <10th percentiles) and multiple birth.Results: ART use in Massachusetts was associated with significantly lower odds of twins as well as triplets and higher order births compared to Florida and Michigan (aOR 22.6 vs. 30.0 and 26.3, and aOR 37.6 vs. 92.8 and 99.2, respectively; Pinteraction < 0.001). ART use was associated with increased odds of SGA in Michigan only, and with preterm delivery (<32 and <37 weeks) in all states (aOR range: 1.60, 1.87).Conclusions: ART use was associated with an increased risk of preterm delivery among singletons that showed little variability between states. The number of twins, triplets and higher order gestations per cycle was lower in Massachusetts, which may be due to the availability of insurance coverage for ART in Massachusetts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Assisted Reproductive Technology ( ART) includes fertility procedures where both egg and sperm are handled in the lab. ART use has increased considerably in recent years, accounting for 47 090 livebirths in the US in 2010. ART increases the probability of multiple gestation births, which are at higher risks than singletons for adverse outcomes. Additionally, ART is associated with a greater risk of complications during pregnancy, labour, and delivery, and increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in singleton births. Methods We merged Florida and Massachusetts birth records from 2004-06 with the National ART Surveillance System ( NASS) and using NASS as the gold standard, calculated sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value ( PPV) of ART reporting on the birth certificates by maternal, infant, and hospital characteristics. We fit random-effects logistic regression models to evaluate simultaneously the association of ART reporting with these predictors while accounting for correlation among births occurring in the same hospital. Results Sensitivity of ART reporting on the birth certificate was 28.9% in Florida and 41.4% in Massachusetts. Specificity was >99% in both states. PPV was 45.5% in Florida and 54.6% in Massachusetts. The odds of ART reporting varied by state and by several maternal and delivery characteristics including age, parity, history of fetal loss, plurality, race/Hispanic ethnicity, delivery payment source, pre-existing conditions, and complications during pregnancy or labour and delivery. Conclusions There was significant under-reporting of ART procedures on the birth certificates. Using data on ART births identified only from birth certificates yields a biased sample of the population of ART births. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To assess the validity of probabilistic linkage (PL) in combining national surveillance data on assisted reproductive technology (ART) with Massachusetts birth and infant death data, for the purpose of monitoring maternal and child health outcomes of ART. A study conducted in 2006 utilized direct identifiers to match Massachusetts birth records with records on ART procedures performed to Massachusetts residents in fertility clinics located in Massachusetts and Rhode Island, achieving a linkage rate of 87.5%. The present study employed PL using the program Link Plus, without access to direct identifiers. The primary linking variables were maternal and infant dates of birth, and plurality. Ancillary variables such as maternal ZIP code and gravidity helped resolve duplicate matches and capture additional matches. PL linked 5,390 (87.8%) of 6,139 deliveries, correctly identifying 96.4% of the matches previously obtained using deterministic linkage methods. PL yielded a high linkage rate with satisfactory validity; this method may be applied in other states to help monitor the maternal and child health outcomes of ART. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objectives of this study were to determine risk factors for early (less than 34 weeks gestation) and late (34-36 weeks gestation) preterm singleton birth, by assisted reproductive technology (ART) status. We linked data from Massachusetts birth records and ART records representing singleton live births from 1997 through 2004. Using multinomial regression models, we assessed risk factors for early and late preterm birth by ART status. From 1997 to 2004 in Massachusetts, among non-ART births, risk factors for early and late preterm birth were similar and included women <15 and ≥35 years of age, those of non-white race or Hispanic ethnicity, those with ≤12 years of education, those with chronic diabetes, those with gestational diabetes, those with gestational hypertension, those who smoked during pregnancy, those who used fertility medications, and those who had not had a previous live birth. Among ART births, risk factors for early and late preterm birth differed and odds of early preterm birth were increased among women with ≤12 years of education while odds of late preterm birth were increased among women with gestational diabetes. Odds of both early and late preterm birth were increased among women of non-white race or Hispanic ethnicity and among women with gestational hypertension. Among non-ART births, increased risk for preterm birth was more strongly related to socioeconomic factors than among ART births. Medical conditions were associated with an increased risk for preterm birth regardless of women's ART status. Efforts to prevent preterm births should focus on reducing modifiable risk factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of assisted reproductive technology (ART) reporting on the Massachusetts birth certificate and to explore the individual and hospital-level characteristics associated with ART reporting. Design: Validity analysis of population-based data. Setting: Live-birth deliveries by Massachusetts-resident mothers during 1997–2000. Patient(s): Live births and delivery mothers. Intervention(s): The ART data maintained by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were linked with the live birth–infant death records in Massachusetts. Successfully linked records were used as the gold standard for ART-related deliveries in evaluating the validity of the ART information reported on the Massachusetts birth certificate. Main Outcome Measure(s): Sensitivity and specificity. Result(s): The sensitivity of ART reporting on the birth certificate was 27% and the specificity >99%. Sensitivity of ART reporting was higher among women with multiple deliveries (twins: 32%; triplets+: 43%) and preterm deliveries (36%). Conclusion(s): During the period evaluated, reporting of ART information on the birth certificate was incomplete, and ART births identified through the birth certificate were a biased sample of the population of ART births. Using delivery hospital data as the sole source of ART information for the standard birth certificate may yield inaccurate information. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine the feasibility of linking assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles for individual women to compare per-cycle and cumulative live-birth rates.Design: Historical cohort study.Setting: Clinic-based data.Patient(s): A total of 27,906 ART cycles with residency or treatment in Massachusetts during 2004-2006 and reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System (SART CORS) on-line database.Intervention(s): None.Main Outcome Measure(s): Per-cycle and cumulative live-birth rates.Result(s): Linkage of cycles up to and including the first live-birth delivery revealed 14,265 women who averaged 1.9+/-1.2 SD cycles (range 1-11). These cycles yielded 9,452 pregnancies resulting in 7,675 live-birth deliveries. From cycle 1 to cycle 4, the cumulative live-birth rate for all patients increased from 30.4% to 43.3%, 49.1%, and 51.9%, respectively, and plateaued thereafter at about 53%. The cumulative live-birth rate after three cycles using donor oocytes was approximately 60% for women aged<43 years and >50% for women>or=43 years; for autologous oocytes it was 60.1% for ages<35 years and declined steadily to 8.5% for ages>or=43 years.Conclusion(s): The results demonstrate the feasibility of linking ART cycles for individual women from SART CORS to characterize cumulative live-birth rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess associations between assisted reproductive technology (ART) and adverse maternal and infant outcomes, with an emphasis on singletons. Methods: We linked data from the US ART surveillance system with Massachusetts live birth-infant death records data for resident births in 1997–1998 and compared births conceived with ART ( N = 3316) with births not conceived with ART or infertility medications ( N = 157,066) on: maternal chronic conditions, pregnancy complications, labor and delivery complications, and perinatal and infant outcomes. Results: Overall, ART was strongly associated with numerous adverse outcomes. The magnitude was reduced for several outcomes when analyses were limited to singletons. After further exclusion of maternal subsets with rare ART births (maternal age <20; education

It is unknown whether people in same-sex relationships who give birth have different perinatal outcomes than people in different-sex relationships, despite differences in risk factors such as use of assisted reproductive technologies, obesity, smoking, and poor mental health. Marriage equality has established birth certificates as a promising new source of population-based data on births to same-sex married parents. We used birth certificate data from Massachusetts for 201,873 singletons born to married parents from 2012 to 2016. We estimated the associations of several birth outcomes with having a birth parent in a same-sex marriage using propensity score-matched and -unmatched samples. We also tested whether these associations were modified by the use of assisted reproductive technologies. People in same-sex marriages who gave birth had perinatal outcomes related to decreased fetal growth and preterm birth that were similar to those of their peers in different-sex marriages. Use of assisted reproductive technology was associated with decreased fetal growth and increased risk of preterm birth for infants with different-sex parents but not for infants with same-sex parents. More research is needed across other states and to understand why use of assisted reproductive technology is not a risk factor for poor birth outcomes for those in same-sex marriages., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective. Assisted reproductive technology (ART)-treated women exhibit increased risk of premature delivery compared to fertile women. We evaluated whether ART treatment modalities increase prematurity and whether placental abnormalities and pregnancy-induced hypertensive (PIH) disorders mediate these risks. Method(s): This retrospective study of ART-treated and fertile deliveries (2004–2017) used an ART-cycle database linked to Massachusetts birth certificates and hospital discharges. Outcomes of late preterm birth (LPTB: 34–36 weeks gestation) and early preterm birth (EPTB: <34 weeks gestation) were compared with term deliveries (≥37 weeks gestation) in ART-treated (linked to the ART database) and fertile (no indicators of infertility or ART) deliveries. ART treatments with autologous oocyte, donor oocyte, fresh or frozen embryo transfer (FET), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and no-ICSI were separately compared to the fertile group. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) were calculated with multivariable logistic regression: placental abnormalities or PIH were quantified in the pathway as mediators. Results: There were 218,320 deliveries: 204,438 fertile and 13,882 ART-treated. All treatment types increased prematurity (AOR 1.31–1.58, LPTB; AOR 1.34–1.48, EPTB). Placental abnormalities mediated in approximately 22% and 38% of the association with LPTB and EPTB, respectively. PIH mediated 25% and 33% of the association with LPTB and EPTB in FET and donor oocyte cycles, more than other treatments (<10% LPTB and <13% EPTB). Conclusions: ART-treatment and all ART modalities increased LPTB and EPTB when compared with fertile deliveries. Placental abnormalities modestly mediated associations approximately equally, while PIH was a stronger mediator in FET and donor oocyte cycles. Reasons for differences require exploration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: It is unknown whether the risk of adverse outcomes in twin pregnancies among subfertile women, conceived with and without in vitro fertilization, differs from those conceived spontaneously.Objective: We sought to evaluate the effects of fertility status on adverse perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies on a population basis.Study Design: All twin live births of ≥22 weeks' gestation and ≥350 g birthweight to Massachusetts resident women in 2004 through 2010 were linked to hospital discharge records, vital records, and in vitro fertilization cycles. Women were categorized by their fertility status as in vitro fertilization, subfertile, or fertile, and by twin pair genders (all, like, unlike). Women whose births linked to in vitro fertilization cycles were classified as in vitro fertilization; those with indicators of subfertility but without in vitro fertilization treatment were classified as subfertile; all others were classified as fertile. Risks of 6 adverse pregnancy outcomes (gestational diabetes, pregnancy hypertension, uterine bleeding, placental complications [placenta abruptio, placenta previa, and vasa previa], prenatal hospitalizations, and primary cesarean) and 9 adverse infant outcomes (very low birthweight, low birthweight, small-for-gestation birthweight, large-for-gestation birthweight, very preterm [<32 weeks], preterm, birth defects, neonatal death, and infant death) were modeled by fertility status with the fertile group as reference, using multivariate log binomial regression and reported as adjusted relative risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals.Results: The study population included 10,352 women with twin pregnancies (6090 fertile, 724 subfertile, and 3538 in vitro fertilization). Among all twins, the risks for all 6 adverse pregnancy outcomes were significantly increased for the subfertile and in vitro fertilization groups, with highest risks for uterine bleeding (adjusted relative risk ratios, 1.92 and 2.58, respectively) and placental complications (adjusted relative risk ratios, 2.07 and 1.83, respectively). Among all twins, the risks for those born to subfertile women were significantly increased for very preterm birth and neonatal and infant death (adjusted relative risk ratios, 1.36, 1.89, and 1.87, respectively). Risks were significantly increased among in vitro fertilization twins for very preterm birth, preterm birth, and birth defects (adjusted relative risk ratios, 1.28, 1.07, and 1.26, respectively).Conclusion: Risks of all maternal and most infant adverse outcomes were increased for subfertile and in vitro fertilization twins. Among all twins, the highest risks were for uterine bleeding and placental complications for the subfertile and in vitro fertilization groups, and neonatal and infant death in the subfertile group. These findings provide further evidence supporting single embryo transfer and more cautious use of ovulation induction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Births to subfertile women, with and without infertility treatment, have been reported to have lower birthweights and shorter gestations, even when limited to singletons. It is unknown whether these decrements are due to parental characteristics or aspects of infertility treatment.Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of maternal fertility status on the risk of pregnancy, birth, and infant complications.Study Design: All singleton live births of ≥22 weeks' gestation and ≥350 g birthweight to Massachusetts resident women in 2004-2010 were linked to hospital discharge and vital records. Women were categorized by their fertility status as in vitro fertilization, subfertile, or fertile. Women whose births linked to in vitro fertilization cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System were classified as in vitro fertilization. Women with indicators of subfertility but not treated with in vitro fertilization were classified as subfertile. Women without indicators of subfertility or in vitro fertilization treatment were classified as fertile. Risks of 15 adverse outcomes (gestational diabetes, pregnancy hypertension, antenatal bleeding, placental complications [placenta abruptio and placenta previa], prenatal hospitalizations, primary cesarean delivery, very low birthweight [<1500 g], low birthweight [<2500 g], small-for-gestation birthweight [z-score ≤-1.28], large-for-gestation birthweight [z-score ≥1.28], very preterm [<32 weeks], preterm [<37 weeks], birth defects, neonatal death [0-27 days], and infant death [0-364 days of life]) were modeled by fertility status with the fertile group as reference and the subfertile group as reference, using multivariate log binomial regression and reported as adjusted risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals.Results: The study population included 459,623 women (441,420 fertile, 8054 subfertile, and 10,149 in vitro fertilization). Women in the subfertile and in vitro fertilization groups were older than their fertile counterparts. Risks for 6 of 6 pregnancy outcomes and 6 of 9 infant outcomes were increased for the subfertile group, and 5 of 6 pregnancy outcomes and 7 of 9 infant outcomes were increased for the in vitro fertilization group. For 4 of the 6 pregnancy outcomes (uterine bleeding, placental complications, prenatal hospitalizations, and primary cesarean) and 2 of the infant outcomes (low birthweight and preterm) the risk was greater in the in vitro fertilization group, with nonoverlapping confidence intervals to the subfertile group, indicating a substantially higher risk among in vitro fertilization-treated women. The highest risks for the in vitro fertilization women were uterine bleeding (adjusted risk ratio, 3.80; 95% confidence interval, 3.31-4.36) and placental complications (adjusted risk ratio, 2.81; 95% confidence interval, 2.57-3.08), and for in vitro fertilization infants, very preterm birth (adjusted risk ratio, 2.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.80-2.52), and very low birthweight (adjusted risk ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.80-2.56). With subfertile women as reference, risks for the in vitro fertilization group were significantly increased for uterine bleeding, placental complications, prenatal hospitalizations, primary cesarean delivery, low and very low birthweight, and preterm and very preterm birth.Conclusion: These analyses indicate that, compared with fertile women, subfertile and in vitro fertilization-treated women tend to be older, have more preexisting chronic conditions, and are at higher risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes, particularly uterine bleeding and placental complications. The greater risk in in vitro fertilization-treated women may reflect more severe infertility, more extensive underlying pathology, or other unfavorable factors not measured in this study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To use linked assisted reproductive technology (ART) surveillance and birth certificate data to compare ET practices and perinatal outcomes for a state with a comprehensive mandate requiring coverage of IVF services versus states without a mandate., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Setting: Not applicable., Patient(s): Live-birth deliveries ascertained from linked 2007-2009 National ART Surveillance System and birth certificate data for a state with an insurance mandate (Massachusetts) and two states without a mandate (Florida and Michigan)., Intervention(s): None., Main Outcome Measure(s): Number of embryos transferred, multiple births, low birth weight, preterm delivery., Result(s): Of the 230,038 deliveries in the mandate state and 1,026,804 deliveries in the nonmandate states, 6,651 (2.9%) and 8,417 (0.8%), respectively, were conceived by ART. Transfer of three or more embryos was more common in nonmandate states, although the effect was attenuated for women 35 years or older (33.6% vs. 39.7%; adjusted relative risk [RR], 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.81) versus women younger than 35 (7.0% vs. 26.9%; adjusted RR, 4.18; 95% CI, 2.74-6.36). Lack of an insurance mandate was positively associated with triplet/higher order deliveries (1.0% vs. 2.3%; adjusted RR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.81-3.28), preterm delivery (22.6% vs. 30.7%; adjusted RR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.20-1.42), and low birth weight (22.3% vs. 29.5%; adjusted RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.17-1.40)., Conclusion(s): Compared with nonmandate states, the mandate state had higher overall rates of ART use. Among ART births, lack of an infertility insurance mandate was associated with increased risk for adverse perinatal outcomes., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: To identify a group of deliveries to mothers with indicators of subfertility (SUBFERTILITY)., Design: Longitudinal cohort study., Setting: Hospital., Patient(s): A total of 334,152 deliveries to Massachusetts mothers in a Massachusetts hospital between July 1, 2004, and December 31, 2008., Intervention(s): None., Main Outcome Measure(s): Subfertility was defined by an indication on a current or past birth certificate or hospital utilization data of infertility or assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycle before index delivery and no indication of ART use with index delivery., Result(s): Initially, 12,367 deliveries met the inclusion criteria for SUBFERTILITY (8,019 from birth certificates, 2,777 from hospital data, 1,571 from prior ART treatment). Removing deliveries from more than one data source resulted in 10,764 unique deliveries. Removing deliveries resulting from ART treatments left 6,238 deliveries in the SUBFERTILITY category. Demographic analysis indicated that deliveries in SUBFERTILITY were more similar to those in the ART population than to those in the fertile population., Conclusion(s): We have demonstrated the feasibility of using existing population-based linked public health data sets to identify SUBFERTILITY deliveries, and we have used ART data to distinguish ART and SUBFERTILITY births. The SUBFERTILITY category can serve as a comparison group of subfertile patients for studies of ART delivery and longitudinal health outcomes., (Copyright © 2014 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)