Search

Objective: To determine whether a planned 2-stent double kissing crush technique is superior to provisional stenting patients presenting with true distal LM bifurcation lesions. Study Design: Cross-sectional comparative study. Place and Duration of Study: Armed Forces Institute of Cardiology/National Institute of Heart Diseases, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Dec 2020 to May 2021. Methodology: A total of 70 patients enrolled in the study presented with true distal LM bifurcation lesions (Medina 1, 1, 1 or 0, 1, 1). Patients were randomized to PS or DK crush technique. The primary end-point was peri hospital and 1 month composite rate target lesion failure (TLF): target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), cardiac death, stent thrombosis (ST), target vessel revascularization (TVR). Routine clinical follow up done at 2 weeks and 4 weeks followed by 3 and 6 months thereafter. Results: A total of 70 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. The patient population was divided into two groups. Group A participants underwent DK crush technique while group B participants underwent provisional stenting. In group A [DK crush technique] 16 (45.7%) patients presented with Non-ST elevation MI followed by 14 (40%) who presented with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) while in group B [Provisional stenting] 13 (37.1%) presented with chronic coronary syndrome followed by 9 (25.7%) who presented with non-ST elevation MI. Conclusion: LM-PCI is an acceptable procedure in patients with true distal LM bifurcation lesions who are candidates for PCI. This study also showed that DK-Crush has good periprocedural and angiographic outcomes and superior to PS in complex LMCAD lesions. PS is an acceptable option in simple distal LMCAD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]