1. Functional Movement Disorders during COVID-19: Psychological Distress, Affective Temperament and Emotional Dysregulation.
- Author
-
Janiri, Delfina, Petracca, Martina, Moccia, Lorenzo, Solito, Marcella, Lo Monaco, Maria Rita, Cerbarano, Maria Luana, Piano, Carla, Imbimbo, Isabella, Di Nicola, Marco, Simonetti, Alessio, Sani, Gabriele, and Bentivoglio, Anna Rita
- Subjects
- *
COVID-19 pandemic , *PSYCHOLOGICAL distress , *MOVEMENT disorders , *AFFECTIVE neuroscience , *TEMPERAMENT , *AFFECT (Psychology) , *PSYCHOLOGICAL stress - Abstract
Background and objective: Functional movement disorders (FMD) represent a spectrum of psychosomatic symptoms particularly sensitive to stress. The COVID-19 pandemic has increased psychological distress worldwide and may have worsened FMD. The study aimed to confirm this hypothesis and to test whether in FMD there is a relationship between affective temperament, emotional dysregulation and psychological distress due to the pandemic. Methods: We recruited individuals with FMD, diagnosed them according to validated criteria and matched them with healthy controls (HC). Psychological distress and temperament were obtained using the Kessler-10 and the Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa and San Diego Autoquestionnaire, respectively. We used bootstrapped mediation analysis to test the mediator role of emotional dysregulation on the effect of temperament on psychological distress. Results: The sample consisted of 96 individuals. During the pandemic, 31.3% of the patients reported the need for urgent neurological care, and 40.6% reported a subjective worsening neurological condition. Patients with FMD presented with more psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic (F = 30.15, df = 1, p ≤ 0.001) than HC. They also reported more emotional dysregulation (F = 15.80, df = 1, p ≤ 0.001) and more cyclothymic traits (F = 14.84, df = 1, p ≤ 0.001). Cyclothymic temperament showed an indirect effect on COVID-19-related psychological distress, mediated by deficits in emotion regulation mechanisms (Bootstrapped LLCI = 0.41, ULCI = 2.41). Conclusion: Our results suggest that emotional dysregulation may represent a dimension mediating cyclotimic temperament response to the stressful effect of the pandemic and provide insight for developing intervention policies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF