Search

Background: Persistent racial disparities in lung cancer incidence, treatment, and survival are well documented. Given the importance of surgical resection for lung cancer treatment, racial disparities in surgical quality were investigated using a statewide quality collaborative., Methods: This retrospective study used data from the Michigan Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons General Thoracic database, which includes data gathered for the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database at 17 institutions in Michigan. Adult patients undergoing resection for lung cancer between 2015 and 2021 were included. Propensity score-weighting methodology was used to assess differences in surgical quality, including extent of resection, adequate lymph node evaluation, 30-day mortality, and 30-day readmission rate between white and black patients., Results: The cohort included 5073 patients comprising 357 (7%) black and 4716 (93%) white patients. The black patients had significantly higher unadjusted rates of wedge resection than the white patients, but after propensity score-weighting for clinical factors, wedge resection did not differ from lobectomy (odds ratio [OR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-1.49; P = 0.67). The black patients had fewer lymph nodes collected (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.73-0.81; P < 0.0001) and lymph node stations sampled (IRR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.84-0.94; P < 0.0001). The black patients did not differ from the white patients in terms of mortality (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.19-2.34; P = 0.55) or readmission (OR, 0.79; 95 % CI, 0.49-1.27; P = 0.32). The black patients had longer hospital stays (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.02-1.14; P = 0.01)., Conclusion: In a statewide quality collaborative that included high-volume centers, black patients received a less extensive lymph node evaluation, with fewer non-anatomic wedge resections performed, and a more limited lymph node evaluation with lobectomy., (© 2022. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Background: To combat almost 450,000 Americans dying of opioid overdose between 1999 and 2018, the Michigan Opioid Laws were implemented on July 1, 2018, to reduce overprescription of opioids. This retrospective study evaluated the effect of this legislation on prescribing patterns after thoracic operations at an academic, tertiary care center., Method: Charts of 776 patients undergoing lobectomy, paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair, Nissen fundoplication, or esophagectomy between July 1, 2017, and July 1, 2019, were reviewed. Populations were identified before and after the July 1, 2018 implementation of the Michigan Opioid Laws. Procedure type, analgesic type, total pills, morphine equivalents, and refills and their pill number were independent variables. Patients using opioids for >30 days before operations were excluded., Results: Overall, 629 patients were included in the analysis (324 pre-legislation patients, 305 post-legislation patients). The average number of opioids prescribed to patients at discharge before the legislation was 28.0 pills vs 21.4 pills after (P < .01). Before implementation of the Michigan Opioid Laws, 14.5% of patients received refills, whereas only 5.9% received refills after implementation, reducing the average number of refills per patient from 0.19 to 0.07 (P < .001). Average morphine equivalents and percentage of patients receiving opioids showed no statistical difference., Conclusions: The implementation of the Michigan Opioid Laws correlated with a change in clinical practice, potentially by reducing the number of pills and refills prescribed per patient, and did not deter providers from prescribing opioids acutely. This suggests that the Michigan Opioid Laws allow prescribing freedom while giving legislative structure encouraging time-conscious tapering. The Michigan Opioid Laws may serve as a model for other states to emulate., (Copyright © 2022 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)