Search

Background & Aims: In the absence of methodologically sound randomized controlled trials (RCTs), current recommendations for timing and amount of enteral nutrition (EN) in critically ill children are based on observational studies. These studies have associated achievement of a higher EN intake in critically ill children with improved outcome. Inherent to the observational design of these underlying studies, thorough insight in possible confounding factors to correct for is essential. We evaluated the associations between EN intake and 1) patient and daily clinical characteristics and 2) clinical outcomes adjusted for these patient and clinical characteristics during the first week of critical illness with a multivariable mixed model., Methods: This secondary analysis of the multicentre PEPaNIC RCT investigated a subgroup of critically ill children with daily prospectively recorded gastrointestinal symptoms and EN intake during the first week with multivariable analyses using two-part mixed effect models, including multiple testing corrections using Holm's method. These models combined a mixed-effects logistic regression for the dichotomous outcome EN versus no EN, and a linear mixed-effects model for the patients who received any EN intake. EN intake per patient was expressed as mean daily EN as % of predicted resting energy expenditure (% of EN/REE). Model 1 included 40 fixed effect baseline patient characteristics, and daily parameters of illness severity, feeding, medication and gastrointestinal symptoms. Model 2 included these patient and daily variables as well as clinical outcomes., Results: Complete data were available for 690 children. EN was provided in 503 (73%) patients with a start after a median of 2 (IQR 2-3) days and a median % of EN/REE of 38.8 (IQR 14.1-79.5) over the first week. Multivariable mixed model analyses including all patients showed that admission after gastrointestinal surgery (-49%EN/REE; p = 0.002), gastric feeding (-31% EN/REE; p < 0.001), treatment with inotropic agents (-22%EN/REE; p = 0.026) and large gastric residual volume (-64%EN/REE; p < 0.001) were independently associated with a low mean EN intake. In univariable analysis, low mean EN intake was associated with new acquired infections, hypoglycaemia, duration of PICU and hospital stay and duration of mechanical ventilation. However, after adjustment for confounders, these associations were no longer present, except for low EN and hypoglycaemia (-39%EN/REE; p = 0.018)., Conclusions: Several patient and clinical characteristics during the first week of critical illness were associated with EN intake. No independent associations were found between EN intake and clinical outcomes such as mortality, new acquired infection and duration of stay. These data emphasize the necessity of adequate multivariable adjustment in nutritional support research and the need for future RCTs investigating optimal EN intake., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no competing interest., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The paediatric early versus late parenteral nutrition in critical illness (PEPaNIC) multicentre, randomised, controlled trial showed that, compared with early parenteral nutrition, withholding supplemental parenteral nutrition for 1 week in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU; late parenteral nutrition) reduced infections and accelerated recovery from critical illness in children. We aimed to investigate the long-term impact on physical and neurocognitive development of early versus late parenteral nutrition., Methods: In this preplanned 2-year follow-up study, all patients included in the PEPaNIC trial (which was done in University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium; Erasmus Medical Centre-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands; and Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada) were approached for possible assessment of physical and neurocognitive development compared with healthy children who were matched for age and sex, and who had never been admitted to a neonatal ICU or a PICU. Assessed outcomes comprised anthropometric data; health status; parent-reported or caregiver-reported executive functions and emotional and behavioural problems; and tests for intelligence, visual-motor integration, alertness, motor coordination, inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility, and memory. To address partial responses among the children tested, we did multiple data imputation by chained equations before univariable and multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses adjusted for risk factors. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01536275., Findings: At the 2-year follow-up, 60 (8%) of 717 children who received late parenteral nutrition and 63 (9%) of 723 children who received early parenteral nutrition had died (p=0·81). 68 (9%) of 717 children who received late and 91 (13%) of 723 children who received early parenteral nutrition were too disabled for neurocognitive assessment (p=0·059), and 786 patients (395 assigned to late and 391 assigned to early parenteral nutrition) consented for testing. 786 patients and 405 healthy control children underwent long-term outcome testing between Aug 4, 2014, and Jan 19, 2018, and were included in the imputation model for subsequent multivariable analyses. Late parenteral nutrition did not adversely affect anthropometric data, health status, or neurological functioning, and improved parent-reported or caregiver-reported executive functioning (late vs early parenteral nutrition β estimate -2·258, 95% CI -4·012 to -0·504; p=0·011), more specifically inhibition (-3·422, -5·171 to -1·673; p=0·0001), working memory (-2·016, -3·761 to -0·270; p=0·023), and meta-cognition (-1·957, -3·694 to -0·220; p=0·027). Externalising behavioural problems (β estimate -1·715, 95% CI -3·325 to -0·106; p=0·036) and visual-motor integration (0·468, 0·087 to 0·850; p=0·016) were also improved in the late parenteral nutrition group compared with the early parenteral nutrition group. After Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, the effect on inhibitory control remained significant (p=0·0001)., Interpretation: Withholding early parenteral nutrition for 1 week in the PICU did not negatively affect survival, anthropometrics, health status, and neurocognitive development, and improved inhibitory control 2 years after PICU admission., Funding: European Research Council Advanced Grant, Methusalem programme provided by the Flemish Government, Flemish Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology (IWT), Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), Sophia Children's Hospital Foundation (SSWO), Stichting Agis Zorginnovatie, Erasmus Trustfonds, and European Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ESPEN) research grant., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)