Search

The volume of cold tap water consumed is an essential element in quantitative microbial risk assessment. This paper presents a review of tap water consumption studies. Study designs were evaluated and statistical distributions were fitted to water consumption data from The Netherlands, Great Britain, Germany and Australia. we conclude that the diary is to be preferred for collecting water consumption data. If a diary is not feasible, a 24 h recall would be the best alternative, preferably repeated at least once. From the studies evaluated, the mean daily consumption varies from 0.10L to 1.55L. No conclusions could be drawn regarding the effects of season, age and gender on tap water consumption. Physical activity, yearly income and perceived health status were reported to influence water consumption. Comparison of the different statistical probability distribution functions of the datasets demonstrated that the Poisson distribution performed better than the lognormal distribution as suggested by Roseberry and Burmaster. For quantitative microbiological risk assessment (QMRA) it is recommended to use country-specific consumption data and statistical distributions, if available. If no country specific data are available we recommend to use the Australian distribution data from the Melbourne diary study (Poisson, λ = 3.49 glasses/d) as a conservative estimate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of the current study was to calculate the size of protection zones around (sub)oxic and anoxic sandy aquifers without confining layers using a virus infection and transport model. The maximum allowable virus infection risk was 10-4/person/year at the 95% confidence level. Model results demonstrated that phreatic (sub)oxic sandy aquifers in The Netherlands required protection areas with a residence time of 43–117 d to ensure that the maximum virus infection risk would not be exceeded. This was 0.7–2 × the current guideline of 60 d. In contrast, phreatic anoxic sandy aquifers without confining layers needed protection zones of 555–898 d to stay below the maximum virus infection risk, 9.5–15 × the current guideline. A sensitivity analysis of the model demonstrated that the calculated protection zone was most sensitive for virus inactivation rate and collision efficiency. Values of both parameters were predicted from values obtained from previously published field and laboratory studies. At present, as it is unknown if these values can also be used at other locations, model results should be interpreted with care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Quantitative microbial risk assessments (QMRAs) of contaminated drinking water usually assume the daily intake volume is consumed once a day. However, individuals could consume water at multiple time points over 1 day, so the objective was to determine if the number of consumption events per day impacted the risk of infection from Campylobacter jejuni during short-term contamination events. A probabilistic hydraulic and risk model was used to evaluate the impact of multiple consumption events as compared to one consumption event on the health risk from the intake of contaminated tap water. The fraction of the population that experiences greater than 10(-4) risk of infection per event at the median dose was 6.8% (5th-95th percentile: 6.5-7.2%) for one consumption event per day, 18.2% (5th-95th: 17.6-18.7%) for three consumption events per day, and 19.8% (5th-95th: 14.0-24.4%) when the number of consumption events varied around 3.49 events/day. While the daily intake volume remained consistent across scenarios, the results suggest that multiple consumption events per day increases the probability of infection during short-term, high level contamination events due to the increased coincidence of a consumption event during the contamination peak. Therefore, it will be important to accurately characterize this parameter in drinking water QMRAs.

Participants in a triathlon in Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands, reported gastrointestinal symptoms to the local health authority. A study was performed to establish the number of complaints and the relation with the microbiological water quality at the surface water swimming site, which met current standards. An epidemiological survey was carried out with a questionnaire among 629 participants, with non-participating relatives as controls. Faecal samples of patients and water samples were investigated by conventional methods. 439 participants and 217 controls completed the questionnaire. 140 participants had at least one gastro-intestinal symptom and 28 (6.4%) had highly credible gastroenteritis. Participants had an odds ratio for gastro-enteritis of 14.7 (95% CI: 2.39-604.45). Electron microscopic examination in six of 12 patients showed viruses able to cause such symptoms. Water samples showed considerable faecal pollution at the time of the triathlon (geometric mean counts: thermotolerant coliforms 725/100 ml; faecal streptococci 23/100 ml). The most likely source is the effluent discharge of the nearby waste water treatment plant. A surface water swimming site meeting current standards does not exclude health complaints among tri-athletes.