Search

Purpose: Due to advancing insights, discussing fertility in spinal care is an emerging topic. Studies among neurosurgeons to evaluate clinical practice about discussing fertility are non-existent. The aim of this study is to review knowledge, attitude and practice patterns regarding discussing fertility in spinal care.Methods: Dutch neurosurgeons and residents were sent a mail-based questionnaire addressing attitude, knowledge and practice patterns regarding discussing fertility.Results: Response rate was 62 % (compared to mean of 28 % in similar surveys) with 89 questionnaires suitable for analysis. Mean age was 42 years with 83 % of respondents being male. A quarter of respondents stated neurosurgeons are responsible to discuss fertility, with 12 % indicating to actually do this. Fertility is discussed more often with patients with cauda equina syndrome (70 %) and with men (p = 0.006). Merely 8 % of respondents stated to have adequate knowledge on fertility preservation (FP); this percentage was higher for doctors with spinal surgery as specialty (p = 0.015). In case of cauda equina syndrome, doctors with more knowledge discussed fertility more often (p = 0.002). Fifty-three percent of neurosurgeons wished to enhance their knowledge, in order to feel more comfortable to discuss fertility with their patients. Five percent indicated to have ever referred a patient to a fertility specialist.Conclusion: With the exception of cauda equina syndrome, fertility is not routinely discussed in spinal care. Fertility is discussed more often with men. Recent guidelines state that discussing fertility is an essential part of good practice in spinal care. Education on fertility and FP needs to be integrated in the neurosurgical training program to create more awareness, and to enable clinicians to provide adequate information and care to the patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The possible detrimental effects of spinal disease on sexual health are widely recognized; however, it is not known to what extent neurosurgeons discuss this topic with their patients. The aim of this study is to identify knowledge, attitude and practice patterns of neurosurgeons counseling their patients about sexual health.Methods: All members of the Dutch Association of Neurosurgery (neurosurgeons and residents) were sent a questionnaire addressing their attitudes, knowledge and practice patterns regarding discussing sexual health.Results: Response rate was 62% with 89 questionnaires suitable for analysis. The majority of participants (83%) were male; mean age, 42.4 years. The mean experience in neurosurgical practice was 9 years. Respondents assumed that in 34% of their patients, sexual health was affected due to spinal disease. The majority of respondents (64%) stated that responsibility for discussing sexual health lies (partly) with the neurosurgeon; however, 73% indicated to (almost) never do this. The main reasons for not discussing sexual health were patients' old age (42%), lack of knowledge (38%) and lack of patients' initiative to bring up the subject (36%). Twenty-six percent indicated lack of time as a reason. There was no evidence for gender or doctor's age discordance as important barriers. Fifty percent of participants wished to gain more knowledge on discussing sexual health with patients.Conclusion: This study shows that despite high prevalence of sexual dysfunction (SD) in spinal patients, counseling about sexual health is not often done in neurosurgical care. More training on sexual health counseling early in the residency program seems critical. By initiating the discussion, clinicians who deal with spinal patients have the potential to detect sexual dysfunction (SD) and to refer adequately when necessary, thereby improving overall quality of life of their patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: In most types of cancer, the disease and its treatment can result in altered sexual function (SF). Oncology nurses are strategically placed to address SF since they have frequent patient interaction. Our aim was to establish their knowledge about and attitudes to SF in oncology care and identify their perceived barriers to addressing the subject., Methods: A 37-item questionnaire was administered during the 2012 Dutch Oncology Nursing Congress and mailed to 241 Dutch oncology nursing departments., Results: The majority of 477 nurses (87.6%) agreed that discussing SF is their responsibility. Discussing SF routinely is performed by 33.4% of these nurses, consultations mainly consisted of mentioning treatment side-effects affecting SF (71.3%). There were significant differences depending on experience, knowledge, age, academic degree and department policy. Nurses ≤44 years old (p < 0.001), with <10 years oncology experience (p = 0.001), insufficient knowledge (p < 0.001), no academic degree (p < 0.001), and in whose department policy was lacking or inadequate (p < 0.001), were less comfortable discussing SF. Barriers included lack of training, presence of a third party and no angle or motive for initiating discussion., Conclusions: Findings suggest oncology nurses consider counselling on sexual issues to be an important responsibility, in line with discussing other side-effects caused by the disease or its treatment. Nevertheless, cancer patients may not routinely be receiving a sexual health evaluation by oncology nurses. Results emphasize the potential benefit of providing knowledge, including practical training and a complete department protocol., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Sexual function is an important factor in quality of life, but at risk after several surgical cancer treatments. Our aim was to identify the practice, responsibility, attitudes, knowledge and barriers of surgical oncologists towards providing informed consent on sexual side effects and sexual counselling., Methods: A 31-item questionnaire was sent to all 437 members of the Dutch Society for Surgical Oncology (NVCO)., Results: The majority of 165 responding surgical oncologists (85.5%) stated that discussing sexual function is their responsibility, 13.0% thought it to be somebody else's responsibility. During informed consent of a planned surgical procedure, sexual side effects are mentioned by 36.6% of surgeons in more than half of the cases. Counselling sexual function was performed by 9.2% of the surgeons in more than half of the cases. Older surgeons (≥46 y) and male surgeons discuss sexual concerns more often (p = 0.006 v p = 0.045). Barriers most mentioned included advanced age of the patient (50.6%), not relevant for all types of cancers (43.8%), lack of time (39.9%) and no angle or motive for asking (35.2%). Additional training on counselling patients for sexual concerns was required according to 46.3%., Conclusion: Surgical oncologists do not routinely discuss sexual concerns. Informed consent includes limited information about possible complications on sexual function. Surgeons consider themselves responsible for raising the issue of sexual dysfunction, but consider advanced age of patients, lack of time and no angle or motive for asking as major barriers. Results emphasize the need for raising awareness and providing practical training., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: In patients with cardiovascular disease, sexual dysfunction is frequently encountered. Erectile dysfunction shares the same modifiable risk factors as coronary artery disease and the fear of triggering cardiovascular events can create stress and anxiety impacting the sexual lives of patients and their partners. To optimise healthcare, knowledge of cardiologists' attitude and practice patterns regarding the discussion about sexual function is essential., Methods: A 31-itemed anonymous questionnaire was mailed to 980 members of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology (cardiologists and residents in cardiology training). The questionnaire addressed awareness, knowledge and practice patterns about sexual dysfunction in cardiac patients., Results: Of the cardiologists 53.9 % responded. Sixteen percent stated to discuss sexual function regularly. In the past year, an estimated mean of 2 % of patients was referred for help with a sexual problem. The majority (70 %) of cardiologists advised patients never or seldom about resuming sexual activity after myocardial infarction. PDE5-inhibitor use was assessed by 19.4 % of the cardiologists. Important reasons not to discuss sexual function were lack of initiative of the patient (54 %), time constraints (43 %) and lack of training on dealing with SD (35 %). Sixty-three percent of the cardiologists stated they would be helped with a directory of sexual healthcare professionals where they can refer patients to., Conclusion: Sexuality is not routinely discussed in the cardiology practice. Explanations for the lack of attention toward sexual matters are ambiguities about responsibility and a lack of time, training and experience regarding the communication and treatment of sexual dysfunction.