Search

Purpose: To study the course and consequences of work-related upper extremity disorders in the registry of the Netherlands Centre for Occupational Diseases (NCvB). Methods: A follow-up study was performed in a sample of consecutive cases of work-related upper extremity disorders notified to the NCvB. Perceived severity was measured with VAS (0-100), quality of life with VAS (0-100) and SF-36, functional impairment with DASH and sickness absence with a questionnaire. Measurements took place directly after notification (T0) and after 3, 6 and 12 months (T1-T3). A linear mixed model was used to compare scores over time. Results: Average age of the 48 consecutive patients (89% response) was 42 years; 48% were men. Perceived severity, functional impairment and sickness absence decreased statistically significant during the follow-up period, and quality of life scores improved. Patients older than 45 years scored worse on perceived severity of the disease, functional impairment and quality of life than did younger patients. Conclusions: The role of registries of occupational diseases for preventive policy can be extended by creating longitudinal data in sample projects. In the sample from our registry, work-related upper extremity disorders had a favourable course. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The aim was to gain insight into work experiences and problems of subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to develop more effective guidelines for preventing work disability and work loss. Methods: A total of 617 patients aged 45–60, recruited from pulmonary outpatient clinics and general practices, completed a questionnaire on (respiratory) health and work history. Results: Of the patients 43% were female, 52% were employed and more than half were less educated. Comorbidity was present in 52% of the study group. Of those who stopped working ( N=260), 36% stopped before the onset of COPD, 39% stopped because of COPD and 25%, although having COPD, had other reasons to stop. Of the patients with a work history 39% had an invalidity benefit: 21% of the working and 60% of the non-working patients. For one-third of these patients COPD was not the reason for having an invalidity benefit. For 56% of those who had a benefit because of COPD, comorbidity contributed to work disability. No difference in current smoking habit was seen between working patients and non-working patients. Yet, non-working patients were more often smokers at the moment they stopped working. Furthermore, former smokers who still worked stopped smoking at a younger age than former smokers who stopped working. Compared with workers and independent of smoking habit, former workers were more exposed to dust/irritants, had their work(place) less frequently modified and had more unfavourable (social) work experiences. Conclusion: For employees with COPD, work loss is often multi-factorial. Comorbidity is often present and an important cause for work loss. Therefore occupational health guidance has to take other interfering (health) factors than COPD into consideration as well. In preventing work disability, work(place) adjustment merits more attention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A voluntary surveillance scheme of occupational skin diseases (OSDs) in The Netherlands starting in 2001 aimed to improve insight in the incidence of OSD especially occupational contact dermatitis (OCD), risk professions and causal agents. This paper presents the results of this scheme during 2001-05., Methods: Reports of new cases of OSD received from the participating dermatologists on a monthly basis were analysed. Data evaluated included information on diagnosis, sex, age, sickness, absenteeism, profession and causal agents. Relative differences in incidence rates between industries or branches were estimated by calculating incidence rate ratios., Results: About 80% of the notifications concerned OCD. The highest number of notifications was recorded in the first year of the scheme. This was probably due to reporting of a mixture of incident and prevalent cases. During the following 5 years, the number of yearly notifications of OSD declined. Hairdressers, nurses, metalworkers, mechanics and cleaners were the most commonly affected professions. Wet work and irritating substances were the most frequently reported causal agents. Most patients with OCD were not absent from work., Conclusions: A voluntary surveillance scheme with dermatologists provides valuable data about the distribution of OCD in risk professions and the causal agents. However, it has certain limitations in assessing trends in incidence. Active medical surveillance in populations at risk should be encouraged not only to improve secondary prevention but also to obtain more reliable information about the incidence of OCD.

The Health Council of the Netherlands published a report in which the best procedure and method for recommending health-based occupational exposure limits (OELs) for inhaled allergens were identified by evaluating the scientific state of the art. Many respiratory disorders in the workplace arise from inhalation of substances which can cause allergy. To protect workers against respiratory allergy, various preventive measures are taken, one of them being reduction of exposure by setting legally binding standards. These are based on health-based OELs that specify a level of exposure to an airborne substance, a threshold level, below which it may reasonably be expected that there is no risk of adverse health effects. The Council is of the opinion that an OEL should prevent against allergic sensitization, as sensitization plays a crucial biological role and is a prerequisite for the development of allergy. Furthermore, the Council considers it most likely that the exposure level below which no allergic sensitization develops for most allergens is so low, that OELs are difficult to set with the current knowledge and technical feasibilities. An alternative approach is to accept exposure, which carries a small predefined risk in developing allergic sensitization. In addition, it is worth considering periodic screening of exposed workers on allergic sensitization, because timely intervention can prevent worse. The feasibility of periodic screening and what else is needed to comply with the most important criteria, should however be judged case-by-case.

Background: Occupational diseases are generally underreported. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a sentinel surveillance project comprising motivated and guided occupational physicians would provide higher quality information than a national registry for a policy to prevent occupational diseases., Methods: A group of 45 occupational physicians participated in a sentinel surveillance project for two years. All other occupational physicians (N = 1,729) in the national registry were the reference group. We compared the number of notifications per occupational physician, the proportion of incorrect notifications, and the overall reported incidence of occupational diseases., Results: The median number of notifications per occupational physician during the project was 13.0 (IQR, 4.5-31.5) in the sentinel group versus 1.0 (IQR, 0.0-5.0) in the reference group (P < 0.001). The proportion of incorrect notifications was 3.3% in the sentinel group and 8.9% in the reference group (P < 0.001). The overall reported occupational disease incidence was 7 times higher (RR = 6.9, 95% CI: 6.5-7.4) in the sentinel group (466 notifications per 100,000 employee years) than in the reference group (67 notifications per 100,000 employee years)., Conclusions: A sentinel surveillance group comprising motivated and guided occupational physicians reported a substantially higher occupational disease incidence and a lower proportion of incorrect notifications than a national registry., (Copyright 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Objective: In this study the relationship has been studied between exposure time and potential prognostic factors and FEV1 percent predicted (FEV1-% pred) in workers with potroom asthma, after their transfer from exposure to exposure-free departments., Methods: Between 1970 and 1990 in a Dutch aluminium-production plant, 179 workers had been diagnosed as having potroom asthma. We carried out a follow-up study (n = 122) in the population still present at the factory 5 years after their relocation to an exposure-free department. In this study population, we examined the relationship between FEV1-% pred at follow-up, and exposure time: the time interval between start of exposure and diagnosis. To correct for confounding factors, we included age, pre-employment FEV1-% pred, allergy, medical treatment, and smoking in the analysis., Results: The mean FEV1-% pred at follow-up was within the normal range (90.3, SD 13.5). Long exposure time was significantly associated with a low FEV1-% pred at follow-up (P = 0.0046). Adjustment was necessary for pre-employment FEV1-% pred and current smoking as confounding factors., Conclusion: Long duration of exposure is a factor affecting FEV1 in workers with potroom asthma. The results of this study give support for additional preventive measures to be taken, such as early recognition of work-related respiratory complaints and repeated education.

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether preventive measures such as reduction of exposure and the introduction of the histamine provocation test (HPT) as a selection instrument resulted in a lower incidence of potroom asthma (PA) and a longer time lag between the commencement of employment and the occurrence of PA. Between 1970 and 1990, 179 cases of PA were diagnosed. This period was divided into three periods. During period 1 (1970-1975), no exposure data were available. Period 2 (1976-1981) is characterized by known exposure data obtained by means of fluoride determinations in urine. At the beginning of period 3 (1982-1990) the HPT was incorporated into the preemployment medical examination. We computed the incidence density (ID) in the three periods and analyzed the timelag in relation to the year of employment and confounding factors such as age, atopic history, blood eosinophil counts, lung function, smoking habits at preemployment, and exposure level. After introduction of the preemployment HPT the ID decreased, but cases continued to occur (ID 11.6 in period 2 versus 2.5 in period 3). The time lag was did not differ when subjects with bronchial hyperresponsiveness were screened out. The exposure level and an atopic history were factors associated with the period of employment and, therefore, confounded the results. The results of this study support the role of an atopic history as a risk factor for development of PA at lower exposure levels and suggest that potroom exposure not only incites asthmatic symptoms but also acts as an inducer of respiratory disease.

The association between exposure to airway irritants and the presence of work-related symptoms and whether this association was modified by airway hyper-responsiveness, smoking, and allergy by history was studied in 668 workers of synthetic fiber plants. A Dutch version of the British Medical Research Council (BMRC) questionnaire with additional questions on allergy and work-related symptoms was used to assess symptoms, and a standardized histamine challenge test of airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR) was employed. Work-related symptoms were defined as having more than usual eye and respiratory symptoms during work. On the basis of job titles and working department, the exposure status of all workers was characterized into seven groups: (1) reference group; (2) white collars; (3) SO2, HCl, SO4(2-); (4) polyester vapor; (5) oil mist and oil vapor; (6) polyamide and polyester vapor; and (7) multiple exposure. The association between exposure groups and work-related symptom prevalence was estimated by means of multiple logistic regression. The overall prevalence of the work-related symptoms were: cough 9%; phlegm 6%; dyspnea 7%; wheeze 2%; eye symptoms 16%; nasal symptoms 15%. Exposure to airway irritants was significantly associated with work-related symptoms, independent of AHR, smoking, allergy by history, and chronic respiratory symptoms. The association of exposure group with work-related symptoms was stronger for subjects with AHR than for subjects with no AHR. The association with dyspnea and/or wheeze was also stronger for smokers than for nonsmokers and ex-smokers. In contrast, the association between exposure and a higher prevalence of work-related symptoms was stronger in subjects with no history of allergy than in subjects with history of allergy. This is most likely due to the relatively high prevalence of background symptoms in (nonexposed) allergic subjects. It is concluded that exposure to irritants in the working environment might lead to respiratory symptoms, even if exposure levels are relatively low.

We carried out a nested case-control study in an aluminium producing plant, using the results of pre-employment examination to identify workers with an increased risk of developing work-related obstructive respiratory symptoms. Cases (n=49) are those who had become unable to work because of work-related respiratory disease. They were compared with 49 matched controls. Pre-employment eosinophil count was strongly related to the occurrence of work-related obstructive respiratory disease. This finding is interesting in the light of a possible pathogenesis.