Search

Background: Since July 1998 all Dutch women (+/- 200,000/y) are screened for red cell antibodies, other than anti-RhesusD (RhD) in the first trimester of pregnancy, to facilitate timely treatment of pregnancies at risk for hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Evidence for benefits, consequences and costs of screening for non-RhD antibodies is still under discussion. The screening program was evaluated in a nation-wide study. As a part of this evaluation study we investigated, according to the sixth criterium of Wilson and Jüngner, the acceptance by pregnant women of the screening program for non-RhD antibodies., Methods: Controlled longitudinal survey, including a prenatal and a postnatal measurement by structured questionnaires., Main Outcome Measures: information satisfaction, anxiety during the screening process (a.o. STAI state inventory and specific questionnaire modules), overall attitude on the screening program. Univariate analysis was followed by standard multivariate analysis to identify significant predictors of the outcome measures., Participants: 233 pregnant women, distributed over five groups, according to the screening result., Results: Satisfaction about the provided information was moderate in all groups. All screen- positive groups desired more supportive information. Anxiety increased in screen- positives during the screening process, but decreased to basic levels postnatally. All groups showed a strongly positive balance between perceived utility and burden of the screening program, independent on test results or background characteristics., Conclusion: Women highly accept the non-RhD antibody screening program. However, satisfaction about provided information is moderate. Oral and written information should be provided by obstetric care workers themselves, especially to screen-positive women.

Background: Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) is a severe disease, resulting from maternal red cell (RBC) alloantibodies directed against fetal RBCs. The effect of a first-trimester antibody screening program on the timely detection of HDFN caused by antibodies other than anti-D was evaluated., Study Design and Methods: Nationwide, all women (1,002 in 305,000 consecutive pregnancies during 18 months) with alloantibodies other than anti-D, detected by a first-trimester antibody screen, were included in a prospective index-cohort study. In a parallel-coverage validation study, patients with HDFN caused by antibodies other than anti-D, that were missed by the screening program, were retrospectively identified., Results: The prevalence of positive antibody screens at first-trimester screening was 1,232 in 100,000; the prevalence of alloantibodies other than anti-D was 328 in 100,000, of which 191 of 100,000 implied a risk for occurrence of HDFN because the father carried the antigen. Overall, severe HDFN, requiring intrauterine or postnatal (exchange) transfusions, occurred in 3.7 percent of fetuses at risk: for anti-K in 11.6 percent; anti-c in 8.5 percent; anti-E in 1.1 percent; Rh antibodies other than anti-c, anti-D, or anti-E in 3.8 percent; and for antibodies other than Rh antibodies or anti-K, in none of the fetuses at risk. All affected children, where antibodies were detected, were promptly treated and healthy at the age of 1 year. The coverage validation study showed a sensitivity of the screening program of 75 percent. Five of 8 missed cases were caused by anti-c, with delay-induced permanent damage in at least 1., Conclusion: First-trimester screening enables timely treatment of HDFN caused by antibodies other than anti-D, however, with a sensitivity of only 75 percent. A second screening at Week 30 of c- women will enhance the screening program. Severe HDFN, caused by antibodies other than anti-D, is associated with anti-K, anti-c, and to a lesser extent with other Rh-alloantibodies.

Background: In 1998 a national program for first-trimester screening for red cell (RBC) antibodies in all pregnant women was implemented. The aim of our study was to assess the impact on perinatal mortality caused by Kell alloimmunization, Study Design and Methods: Prospectively collected data on all pregnant women referred to our center from 1988 until 2005 for intrauterine transfusion (IUT) for fetal anemia due to Kell alloantibodies were analyzed. The cohort was divided into two groups, those treated before 1998 and those treated after 1998. The primary outcome was fetal and neonatal survival. Secondary outcome variables were gestational age, fetal hemoglobin (Hb) levels at first IUT, severity of hydrops, and total number of IUTs per pregnancy. Causes for mortality were analyzed in detail., Results: A total of 43 pregnancies were included, 18 before introduction of screening and 25 thereafter. Perinatal survival increased from 61 percent in the first period to 100 percent after introduction of screening. After 1998, fetal hydrops was generally less severe at first IUT, while gestational age and fetal Hb levels at first IUT were similar., Conclusion: Implementation of routine screening for Kell antibodies in pregnancy was associated with an increased referral rate for suspected fetal anemia, more timely referrals, and a higher perinatal survival rate after intrauterine treatment.

Objective: To evaluate outcome of red cell alloimmunized pregnancies treated with intravascular intrauterine blood transfusions., Design: Retrospective., Methods: Medical records of all women and neonates treated with intrauterine transfusions in the period March 1987-December 1995, were reviewed. Survival rates of the infants were analysed in relation to both gestational age and the presence or absence of hydrops at the time of the first transfusion., Results: In 153 pregnancies 155 foetuses underwent 462 transfusions (median: 3; range: 1-7). Patients were immunized against RhD in 88%. Kell in 7% and Rhe in 5% of the cases. Overall survival rate was 83%. No difference in survival rate was found between children with the first transfusion early (< or = 26 weeks) or late (> 26 weeks) in pregnancy. Survival rate for foetuses without hydrops was significantly higher than for those with hydrops (90% versus 73%). The mildly hydropic foetuses had a significantly higher survival rate than the severely hydropic foetuses (94% versus 53%). Absence of intrauterine reversal of hydrops was associated with a bad outcome., Conclusion: Intravascular transfusion is an effective and safe procedure for correction of foetal anaemia provided it is performed by an experienced multidisciplinary team. In contrast to gestational age at first transfusion severity of hydrops is predictive for successful treatment, so timely institution of treatment is of paramount importance.