Search

We investigated a large outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 infections among passengers and crew members (60 cases in 132 persons) on a cruise ship sailing for 7 days on rivers in the Netherlands. Whole-genome analyses suggested a single or limited number of viral introductions consistent with the epidemiologic course of infections. Although some precautionary measures were taken, no social distancing was exercised, and air circulation and ventilation were suboptimal. The most plausible explanation for introduction of the virus is by persons (crew members and 2 passengers) infected during a previous cruise, in which a case of COVID-19 had occurred. The crew was insufficiently prepared on how to handle the situation, and efforts to contact public health authorities was inadequate. We recommend installing clear handling protocols, direct contacts with public health organizations, training of crew members to recognize outbreaks, and awareness of air quality on river-cruise ships, as is customary for most seafaring cruises.

In early May 2022, a global outbreak of mpox started among persons without travel history to regions known to be enzootic for monkeypox virus (MPXV). On 8 August 2022, the Netherlands reported its 1,000th mpox case, representing a cumulative incidence of 55 per million population, one of the highest cumulative incidences worldwide. We describe characteristics of the first 1,000 mpox cases in the Netherlands, reported between 20 May and 8 August 2022, within the context of the public health response. These cases were predominantly men who have sex with men aged 31-45 years. The vast majority of infections were acquired through sexual contact with casual partners in private or recreational settings including LGBTQIA+ venues in the Netherlands. This indicates that, although some larger upsurges occurred from point-source and/or travel-related events, the outbreak was mainly characterised by sustained transmission within the Netherlands. In addition, we estimated the protective effect of first-generation smallpox vaccine against moderate/severe mpox and found a vaccine effectiveness of 58% (95% CI: 17-78%), suggesting moderate protection against moderate/severe mpox symptoms on top of any possible protection by this vaccine against MPXV infection and disease. Communication with and supporting the at-risk population in following mitigation measures remains essential.

We used national registry data on human cases of Francisella tularensis subspecies holarctica infection to assess transmission modes among all 26 autochthonous cases in the Netherlands since 2011. The results indicate predominance of terrestrial over aquatic animal transmission sources. We recommend targeting disease-risk communication toward hunters, recreationists, and outdoor professionals.

BackgroundTimely notification of infectious diseases is essential for effective disease control and needs regular evaluation.AimOur objective was to evaluate the effects that statutory adjustments in the Netherlands in 2008 and raising awareness during outbreaks had on notification timeliness.MethodsIn a retrospective analyses of routine surveillance data obtained between July 2003 and November 2017, delays between disease onset and laboratory confirmation (disease identification delay), between laboratory confirmation and notification to Municipal Health Services (notification delay) and between notification and reporting to the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (reporting delay) were analysed for 28 notifiable diseases. Delays before (period 1) and after the law change (periods 2 and 3) were compared with legal timeframes. We studied the effect of outbreak awareness in 10 outbreaks and the effect of specific guidance messages on disease identification delay for two diseases.ResultsWe included 144,066 notifications. Average notification delay decreased from 1.4 to 0.4 days across the three periods (six diseases; p < 0.05), reporting delay decreased mainly in period 2 (from 0.5 to 0.1 days, six diseases; p < 0.05). In 2016-2017, legal timeframes were met overall. Awareness resulted in decreased disease identification delay for three diseases: measles and rubella (outbreaks) and psittacosis (specific guidance messages).ConclusionsLegal adjustments decreased notification and reporting delays, increased awareness reduced identification delays. As disease identification delay dominates the notification chain, insight in patient, doctor and laboratory delay is necessary to further improve timeliness and monitor the impact of control measures during outbreaks.

A seasonal reassortant A(H1N2) influenza virus harbouring genome segments from seasonal influenza viruses A(H1N1)pdm09 (HA and NS) and A(H3N2) (PB2, PB1, PA, NP, NA and M) was identified in March 2018 in a 19-months-old patient with influenza-like illness (ILI) who presented to a general practitioner participating in the routine sentinel surveillance of ILI in the Netherlands. The patient recovered fully. Further epidemiological and virological investigation did not reveal additional cases.

Two Dutch travellers were infected with oseltamivir-resistant influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses with an H275Y neuraminidase substitution in early August 2012. Both cases were probably infected during separate holidays at the Catalonian coast (Spain). No epidemiological connection between the two cases was found, and neither of them was treated with oseltamivir before specimen collection. Genetic analysis of the neuraminidase gene revealed the presence of previously described permissive mutations that may increase the likelihood of such strains emerging and spreading widely.

In February 2012 a rabid puppy dog was imported into Amsterdam, the Netherlands from Morocco via Spain. In a joint action between the Netherlands’ Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority, the Public Health Service of Amsterdam and the Centre for Infectious Disease Control all exposed human and animal contacts were traced and, when necessary, provided with post-exposure prophylaxis. During the importation, the international legislations with respect to vaccination requirements were not fully obeyed by veterinarians and custom services.

Between April and May 2010, several medical microbiological laboratories in the Netherlands notified a total of 90 cases of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium with the same antibiogram type (resistant for ampicillin, tetracycline, and co-trimoxazol) and the same multiple locus variable number tandem repeats analysis pattern (03-16-09-NA-311) or single locus variants. Date of illness onset ranged from end of March to mid-May with a peak in the second week of April. Almost half of the cases were hospitalized. Cases completed a questionnaire about food items and other risk factors in the 7 days before illness onset. A matched case-control study was performed. Consumption of "ossenworst" (matched odds ratio 48.2 [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.9-595.9]) and filet américain (8.5 [95% CI: 1.0-73.6]) were found to be significant risk factors for illness. Eighty percent of the cases had eaten at least one or both raw meat products. The producer of the ground beef that was used to produce the "ossenworst" was identified, but no microbiological evidence was found. Consumers should be made more aware of the presence of raw meat in ready-to-eat products and of the potential risk in eating these products. Vulnerable persons such as young children, elderly, and persons with poor health should be discouraged from eating these products. Detection of this outbreak was mainly based on the antibiogram pattern that had identified possible cases 10 days before detailed typing results from the reference laboratory became available, thus facilitating early case findings.

After vaccination of Dutch children against mumps started in 1987 through the National Immunisation Programme the incidence of mumps decreased greatly. However, outbreaks of mumps have been occurring since the end of 2009, especially among students. We describe a vaccinated 20-year-old woman with uncomplicated mumps, a vaccinated 20-year-old student with mumps orchitis, and an unvaccinated 14-year-old boy who developed one-sided permanent deafness as a complication of mumps. Mumps outbreaks are likely caused by factors including incomplete protection following vaccination, waning of immunity, and intensive crowding. Mumps currently affects mainly people who were vaccinated more than 10 years ago. Outbreak response concentrates on surveillance, outbreak investigations, disease awareness, and provision of catch up vaccination to unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated students. Adequate surveillance, important for building evidence for possible changes in mumps vaccination recommendations, depends on recognizing mumps and its complications.

Background: Timely reporting of infectious disease cases to public health authorities is essential to effective public health response. To evaluate the timeliness of reporting to the Dutch Municipal Health Services (MHS), we used as quantitative measures the intervals between onset of symptoms and MHS notification, and between laboratory diagnosis and notification with regard to six notifiable diseases., Methods: We retrieved reporting data from June 2003 to December 2008 from the Dutch national notification system for shigellosis, EHEC/STEC infection, typhoid fever, measles, meningococcal disease, and hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection. For each disease, median intervals between date of onset and MHS notification were calculated and compared with the median incubation period. The median interval between date of laboratory diagnosis and MHS notification was similarly analysed. For the year 2008, we also investigated whether timeliness is improved by MHS agreements with physicians and laboratories that allow direct laboratory reporting. Finally, we investigated whether reports made by post, fax, or e-mail were more timely., Results: The percentage of infectious diseases reported within one incubation period varied widely, between 0.4% for shigellosis and 90.3% for HAV infection. Not reported within two incubation periods were 97.1% of shigellosis cases, 76.2% of cases of EHEC/STEC infection, 13.3% of meningococcosis cases, 15.7% of measles cases, and 29.7% of typhoid fever cases. A substantial percentage of infectious disease cases was reported more than three days after laboratory diagnosis, varying between 12% for meningococcosis and 42% for shigellosis. MHS which had agreements with physicians and laboratories showed a significantly shorter notification time compared to MHS without such agreements., Conclusions: Over the study period, many cases of the six notifiable diseases were not reported within two incubation periods, and many were reported more than three days after laboratory diagnosis. An increase in direct laboratory reporting of diagnoses to MHS would improve timeliness, as would the use of fax rather than post or e-mail. Automated reporting systems have to be explored in the Netherlands. Development of standardised and improved measures for timeliness is needed.

In June 2008, three Dutch tourists participating in a mini-cruise in Turkey needed urgent repatriation for antitoxin treatment because of symptoms of botulism. Because there was a shortage of antitoxin in the Netherlands, an emergency delivery was requested from the manufacturer in Germany. An outbreak investigation was initiated into all nine cruise members, eight of whom developed symptoms. C. botulinum type B was isolated in stool culture from four of them. No other patients were notified locally. Food histories revealed locally purchased unprocessed black olives, consumed on board of the ship, as most likely source, but no left-overs were available for investigation. C. botulinum type D was detected in locally purchased canned peas, and whilst type D is not known to be a cause of human intoxication, its presence in a canned food product indicates an inadequate preserving process. With increasing tourism to areas where food-borne botulism is reported regularly special requests for botulism antitoxin may become necessary. Preparing an inventory of available reserve stock in Europe would appear to be a necessary and valuable undertaking.

Background: Nursing home influenza outbreaks occur in spite of established vaccination programs, and require rapid and sensitive laboratory confirmation for timely intervention., Objectives: To evaluate diagnostic approaches for rapid confirmation of nursing home influenza outbreaks., Study Design: Influenza virus real-time PCR and Directigen Flu A+B enzyme immunoassay were performed on nasopharyngeal swabs, nasopharyngeal washes and throat swabs collected from residents with clinical suspicion of influenza during seven probable nursing home outbreaks in 2004-2005 and 2005-2006. The efficacy of specimen sampling and transport management by Public Health Service outbreak team was evaluated., Results: PCR detected influenza RNA in 80% (68/85) of specimens from 81% (38/47) residents, confirming six suspected outbreaks. Immunoassay sensitivity was highest on nasopharyngeal swabs (38%; 11/29) with a positive predictive value of 100% compared to PCR. Nasopharyngeal swabs were equally sensitive to nasopharyngeal washes by PCR. Nasopharyngeal wash sampling appeared unpractical due to common underlying disability of residents. Outbreak team support was associated with a shorter time to PCR diagnosis compared to outbreaks with no logistical support (mean, 28.2h vs. 84h; P=0.05)., Conclusions: Influenza real-time PCR on nasopharyngeal swabs, obtained by Public Health Service outbreak teams, enabled rapid and sensitive confirmation of nursing home influenza outbreaks.

The influenza vaccine is considered safe, but information on vaccine-related adverse events is limited and a nationwide overview of adverse events is lacking. In 2006, after deaths occurred in Israel and the Netherlands following influenza vaccination, the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport (VWS) asked the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) twice for a recommendation regarding the continuation of the national vaccination campaign. After 4 deaths were reported in Israel in October 2006 following administration of Vaxigrip, the Dutch vaccination campaign was suspended for one week. One month later, 4 additional deaths were reported after influenza vaccination in the Netherlands. The newly appointed outbreak management team concluded that a causal relationship between vaccination and the deaths was highly unlikely, based on data regarding the individual cases, background mortality rates and prior reports of adverse events. Further suspension of the vaccination campaign was deemed unnecessary this time. A centralised nationwide registry of adverse events has since been established to provide further insight into the incidence of adverse events following influenza vaccination. Physicians are advised to report potential adverse events following influenza vaccination to the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb (www.lareb.nl).

A 58-year-old woman was admitted due to a pseudomembranous pharyngitis. The patient had not been vaccinated against diphtheria. Corynebacterium ulcerans was cultured from a throat swab. The production of diphtheria toxin by these bacteria was demonstrated with PCR and an immunoprecipitation test. The patient was cared for in respiratory isolation and was treated with benzylpenicillin. She quickly recovered and was discharged four days after admission. A contact investigation did not reveal any dissemination of the toxin-producing C. ulcerans and a source was not found. In spite of the large-scale vaccination against diphtheria which has taken place in the Netherlands since 1953, a physician has to consider diphtheria in the differential diagnosis of patients who present with a clinical syndrome compatible with this disease. Either Corynebacterium diphtheriae or C. ulcerans could be the pathogen responsible.

Two cases of Lassa fever have been reported in the Netherlands since viral haemorrhagic fevers became notifiable diseases in 1978. In 1980, an expatriate from Burkina Faso who was not seriously ill was confirmed by laboratory tests after his discharge from hospital. The second case occurred in 2000: the patient died on the 11th day of admission to hospital. The problems we faced in the management of this case and the contact investigation--more than one hundred contacts - highlighted the need for national recommendations in the Netherlands.