1. Costs and health effects of CT perfusion-based selection for endovascular thrombectomy within 6 hours of stroke onset: a model-based health economic evaluation.
- Author
-
van Voorst H, Hoving JW, Koopman MS, Daems JD, Peerlings D, Buskens E, Lingsma H, Marquering HA, de Jong HWAM, Berkhemer OA, van Zwam WH, van Walderveen MAA, van den Wijngaard IR, Dippel DWJ, Yoo AJ, Campbell B, Kunz WG, Majoie CB, and Emmer BJ
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Aged, Tomography, X-Ray Computed economics, Middle Aged, Patient Selection, Netherlands, Perfusion Imaging, Aged, 80 and over, Models, Economic, Ischemic Stroke diagnostic imaging, Ischemic Stroke surgery, Ischemic Stroke economics, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Thrombectomy economics, Thrombectomy methods, Endovascular Procedures economics, Endovascular Procedures methods, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Stroke economics, Stroke diagnostic imaging, Stroke surgery
- Abstract
Background: Although CT perfusion (CTP) is often incorporated in acute stroke workflows, it remains largely unclear what the associated costs and health implications are in the long run of CTP-based patient selection for endovascular treatment (EVT) in patients presenting within 6 hours after symptom onset with a large vessel occlusion., Methods: Patients with a large vessel occlusion were included from a Dutch nationwide cohort (n=703) if CTP imaging was performed before EVT within 6 hours after stroke onset. Simulated cost and health effects during 5 and 10 years follow-up were compared between CTP based patient selection for EVT and providing EVT to all patients. Outcome measures were the net monetary benefit at a willingness-to-pay of €80 000 per quality-adjusted life year, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio), difference in costs from a healthcare payer perspective (ΔCosts) and quality-adjusted life years (ΔQALY) per 1000 patients for 1000 model iterations as outcomes., Results: Compared with treating all patients, CTP-based selection for EVT at the optimised ischaemic core volume (ICV≥110 mL) or core-penumbra mismatch ratio (MMR≤1.4) thresholds resulted in losses of health (median ΔQALYs for ICV≥110 mL: -3.3 (IQR: -5.9 to -1.1), for MMR≤1.4: 0.0 (IQR: -1.3 to 0.0)) with median ΔCosts for ICV≥110 mL of -€348 966 (IQR: -€712 406 to -€51 158) and for MMR≤1.4 of €266 513 (IQR: €229 403 to €380 110)) per 1000 patients. Sensitivity analyses did not yield any scenarios for CTP-based selection of patients for EVT that were cost-effective for improving health, including patients aged ≥80 years CONCLUSION: In EVT-eligible patients presenting within 6 hours after symptom onset, excluding patients based on CTP parameters was not cost-effective and could potentially harm patients., Competing Interests: Competing interests: BJE reports grants from LtC (ZonMW and TKI-PPP of Health Holland). WHvZ reports speaker fees from Cerenovus, NicoLab and Stryker, and consulting fees from Philips, all paid to Institution. DWJD report grants from the Dutch Heart Foundation, Brain Foundation Netherlands, ZON MW, Stryker, Medtronic, Cerenovus, Thrombolytic Science, received by the Erasmus University Medical Center outside this project. AJY reports Research grants from Medtronic, Cerenovus, Penumbra, Stryker, and Genentech. Consultant for Penumbra, Cerenovus, Nicolab, Philips, Vesalio, Zoll Circulation, and NIH/NINDS. CBM: grants from Healthcare Evaluation Netherlands, CVON/Dutch Heart Foundation, TWIN foundation and Stryker during the conduct of the study and from European Commission outside this project (all paid to institution) and is shareholder of Nicolab. All other contributors report no other conflicts of interest., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF