1. Linearity And Reliability Of The Emg Amplitude Versus Dynamic Torque Relationship For The Vastus Lateralis.
- Author
-
Stock, Matt, Beck, Travis W, DeFreitas, Jason M, and Dillon, Michael A
- Subjects
- *
QUADRICEPS muscle physiology , *CONFERENCES & conventions , *ELECTROMYOGRAPHY , *EXERCISE physiology , *TORQUE , *RESISTANCE training - Abstract
The use of the “efficiency of electrical activity” (EEA) technique involves plotting EMG amplitude as a function of force at different percentages of one's maximum strength for a given task, and has been used to examine the time course of neural versus hypertrophic contributions to resistance training-induced strength gains. Though several studies have demonstrated a linear EMG amplitude versus force relationship with a reliable slope coefficient under isometric testing conditions, it is unclear whether the EEA technique may be applied to dynamic muscle actions. The purpose of the present investigation was to examine the linearity and reliability of the EMG amplitude versus dynamic torque relationship for the vastus lateralis (VL). Nine healthy men (mean ± SD age = 25.3 ± 4.7 years) and eleven healthy women (mean ± SD age = 22.0 ± 1.3 years) performed concentric isokinetic muscle actions of the dominant leg extensors at 30°·s-1 on two occasions separated by at least 48 hours. The muscle actions were randomly ordered in 10% increments from 10% to 100% of peak torque. During each muscle action, the surface EMG signal was detected from the VL with a bipolar surface electrode arrangement. (See Table 1). The coefficients of determination ranged from r2 = 0.75-0.98 for trial 1 and 0.64-0.99 for trial 2. The results from a paired-samples t-test indicated that there was no mean difference between the linear EMG amplitude versus torque slope coefficients from trial 1 versus trial 2. The linear EMG amplitude versus torque slope coefficient for trial 1 was significantly different from that for trial 2 for 3 (2 were greater, 1 was smaller) of the 20 subjects. The results from a two-way repeated measures ANOVA indicated that there was no significant trial × torque interaction, and no main effect for trial, but there was a significant main effect for torque. In addition, the intraclass correlation coefficient for the linear EMG amplitude versus torque slope coefficients for trials 1 and 2 were 0.730 (SEM = 4.9% of the mean value). The results of the present study indicated that the relationship between EMG amplitude and dynamic torque for the VL did not display an adequate degree of linearity and reliability to be used for the EEA technique. The EEA technique is important in addressing issues such as the neural versus hypertrophic contributions to resistance training-induced strength gains and the mechanisms underlying cross-education. The results of this study suggested that these topics should not be investigated with the use of dynamic muscle actions of the VL.Table 1. Coefficients of determination (r2) and linear slope coefficients for the electromyographic (EMG) amplitude versus torque relationships for trials 1 and 2 for the vastus lateralis (VL) of each subject. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF