Search

Background: In rural and remote Australia, general practitioners (GPs) provide care across the continuum from primary to secondary care, often in Visiting Medical Officer (VMO) arrangements with a local hospital. However, little is known about the role of GP-VMOs in improving the perceived quality of care and health outcomes for rural and remote communities. Methods: We collected qualitative data from three GP-VMOs (all aged >55 years) and 10 patients (all aged over 65 years) in three local health districts of New South Wales, Australia. Thirteen in-depth interviews were conducted between October 2020 and February 2021. We employed thematic analysis to identify key roles of GP-VMOs in improving the perceived quality of care and health outcomes of rural and remote patients. Results: Our study advances the current understanding regarding the role of GP-VMOs in improving the perceived quality of services and health outcomes of rural and remote patients. Key roles of GP-VMOs in improving the perceived quality of care include promoting the continuity of care and integrated health services, cultivating trust from local communities, and enhancing the satisfaction of patients. Conclusions: GP-VMOs work across primary and secondary care creating better linkages and promoting the continuity of care for rural and remote communities. Employing GP-VMOs in rural hospitals enables the knowledge and sensitivity gained from their ongoing interactions with patients in primary care to be effectively utilised in the delivery of hospital care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To quantify utilisation of allied health care services by diabetics in rural NSW and explore reasons for any underutilisation. Design Self-administered mail survey of 268 patients with diagnosed diabetes identified from practice registers. Setting Two rural general practices. Participants One hundred seventeen respondents with diabetes. Main outcome measure Annual frequency of visits to allied health practitioners. Results In the last year, 40.2% of patients had seen a diabetes educator ( DE), 21.4% a dietitian and 47% a podiatrist. However, 25-40% of patients had never used each of the services. Reasons for nonutilisation were non-referral (35.9-68.0%) and lack of perceived need (40.6-59.0%). One third of patients who had not seen a DE in the last year thought their 'general practitioner ( GP) provides a similar service'. However, mean annual GP visits (5.6) were significantly lower than urban and rural comparisons. Patients with formal management plans were, in the last year, twice as likely to have seen a DE and podiatrist, and reported two extra visits to their GP compared to those without. Conclusions Rates of allied health service utilisation were not significantly lower than urban rates; however, there is room for increased uptake of multidisciplinary services. Patients who do not access these services may expect their GP to fulfil multiple roles within a limited number of visits and may not understand the role of other practitioners. Where allied health services are available locally, utilisation may be improved by increasing use of management plans and fostering awareness of the role of allied health practitioners in diabetes management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses a study that examined clinical audit as a method of improving the management of chronic diseases in the general practice of rural health care. It specifically focuses on the management of coronary heart disease (CHD) and explores the experience of general practitioners in clinical audit. It was found that clinical audit in the form of monthly data collection and completion of "Plan-Do-Study-Act" (PDSA) cycles provided a structured approach in ensuring that targets in improving CHD conditions are met.

Unlabelled: Australia has been relatively slow in adopting interprofessional learning (IPL) to prepare health professional students for future collaborative professional practice. A collaborative project between two universities placed senior health professional students in IPL teams in rural southeast New South Wales, Australia, to work on small, locally relevant projects with guidance from locally appointed IPL facilitators. This paper reports on the initial stages of an evaluation of this rural-based IPL intervention using the modified Freeth/Kirkpatrick's 4-level evaluation model., Methods: Students' responses were collected using a debriefing questionnaire, the Interprofessional Education Perception (IEPS) and Team Performance (TPS) scales. An audience feedback questionnaire was structured around project objectives., Results: Seventy-nine students participated in 33 IPL teams during the evaluation period included in this study. IEPS scores increased with participation (t=2.803; p=0.007). The TPS showed a statistically significant difference between teams (ANOVA, F(31,45) = 1.982, p=0.018( and a trend toward agreement with audience perceptions of team performance., Conclusions: The evaluation demonstrated positive short-term outcomes suggesting benefits of this applied approach in preparing students to work interprofessionally.