Search

Background: Cost and compliance are 2 factors that can significantly affect the outcomes of non-operative and operative treatment of trigger finger (TF) and both may be influenced by social factors. The purpose of this study was to investigate socioeconomic disparities in the surgical treatment for TF., Methods: Adult patients (≥18 years old) were identified using International Classification of Diseases 9 and 10 Clinical Modification diagnostic codes for TF and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) procedural codes (CPT: 26055) in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database. Each diagnosis was linked to procedure data to determine which patients went on to have TF release. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the likelihood of receiving surgery. The variables included in the analysis were age, sex, race, social deprivation index (SDI), Charlson Comorbidity Index, and primary insurance type. A P -value < .05 was considered significant., Results: Of the 31 411 TF patients analyzed, 8941 (28.5%) underwent surgery. Logistic regression analysis showed higher odds of receiving surgery in females (odds ratio [OR]: 1.108) and those with workers compensation (OR: 1.7). Hispanic (OR: 0.541), Asian (OR: 0.419), African American (OR: 0.455), and Other race (OR: 0.45) had decreased odds of surgery. Medicaid (OR: 0.773), Medicare (OR: 0.841), and self-pay (OR: 0.515) reimbursement methods had reduced odds of receiving surgery. Higher social deprivation was associated with decreased odds of surgery (OR: 0.988)., Conclusions: There are disparities in demographic characteristics among those who receive TF release for trigger finger related to race, primary insurance, and social deprivation., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objective: Considering the high rates of opioid usage following orthopedic surgeries, it is important to explore this in the setting of the current opioid epidemic. This study examined acute opioid poisonings in postoperative spine surgery patients in New York and the rates of poisonings among these patients in the context of New York's 2016 State legislation limiting opioid prescriptions., Methods: Claims for adult patients who received specific orthopedic spine procedures in the outpatient setting were identified from 2009 to 2018 in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database. Patients were followed to determine if they presented to the emergency department for acute opioid poisoning postoperatively. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate the effect of patient demographic factors on the likelihood of poisoning. The impact of the 2016 New York State Public Health Law Section 3331, 5. (b), (c) limiting opioid analgesic prescriptions was also evaluated by comparing rates of poisoning prelegislation and postlegislation enactment., Results: A total of 107,456 spine patients were identified and 321 (0.3%) presented postoperatively to the emergency department with acute opioid poisoning. Increased age [odds ratio (OR)=0.954, P <0.0001] had a decreased likelihood of poisoning. Other race (OR=1.322, P =0.0167), Medicaid (OR=2.079, P <0.0001), Medicare (OR=2.9, P <0.0001), comorbidities (OR=3.271, P <0.0001), and undergoing multiple spine procedures during a single operative setting (OR=1.993, P <0.0001) had an increased likelihood of poisoning. There was also a significant reduction in rates of postoperative acute opioid poisoning in patients receiving procedures postlegislation with reduced overall likelihood (OR=0.28, P <0.0001)., Conclusion: There is a higher than national average rate of acute opioid poisonings following spine procedures and increased risk among those with certain socioeconomic factors. Rates of poisonings decreased following a 2016 legislation limiting opioid prescriptions. It is important to define factors that may increase the risk of postoperative opioid poisoning to promote appropriate management of postsurgical pain., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There are limited epidemiologic data examining the incidence of pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) over the past decade., Purpose: To examine statewide population trends in the incidence of ACLR in a pediatric population., Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study., Methods: Inpatient and outpatient claims for pediatric patients who underwent ACLR between 2009 and 2017 were identified in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database via International Classification of Diseases (ICD), Revision 9, Clinical Modification; ICD, Revision 10, Clinical Modification and Procedural Classification System; or Current Procedural Terminology codes. New York population data for each year between 2009 and 2017 were used from the New York State Department of Health to calculate the rates of ACLR per 100,000 people aged 3 to 19 years and determine the 95% confidence limits. The rates were then stratified by age, sex, and insurance. Two-year rates of revision and contralateral ACLR were also analyzed by sex., Results: Between 2009 and 2017, 20,170 pediatric ACLRs were identified. The rates of pediatric ACLR increased steadily from 49.3 per 100,000 in 2009 (95% CI, 47.2-51.4) to a peak of 61.0 (95% CI, 58.6-63.4) in 2014 and decreased to 51.8 (95% CI, 49.6-54.1) by 2017. The age group 15 to 17 years had the highest rates of ACLR of all age groups, peaking at 198.5 (95% CI, 188.3-208.7) per 100,000. Analysis by sex showed that ACLR rates between males and females were not different. Males had a 2-year ipsilateral revision rate of 4.3%, while females had a rate of 3.3% ( P = .0001). Females had a contralateral ACLR rate of 4.0%, while males had a rate of 2.6% ( P = .0002)., Conclusion: Pediatric ACLR rates continued to rise until 2014, but there was a demonstrable decrease in rates after 2014. This decline in pediatric ACLR may point to the efficacy of injury prevention programs or changes in practice management. The high revision rate in males and high contralateral surgery rate in females can help guide patient counseling for return to play and complication risk., Clinical Relevance: This study showed that ACLR in pediatric patients may be decreasing in recent years. There were differences in revision and contralateral ACLR by sex.

Purpose: The annual high volume of carpal tunnel releases (CTRs) has a large financial impact on the health care system. Validating the cost drivers related to CTR in a large, diverse patient population may aid in developing cost reduction strategies to benefit health care systems., Methods: Adult patients with carpal tunnel syndrome who underwent CTR were identified in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database from 2016 to 2017. The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System is a comprehensive all-payer database that collects all inpatient and outpatient preadjudicated claims in New York. A multivariable mixed model regression with random effects was performed for the facility to assess the variables that contributed significantly to the total charge. The variables included were patient age, sex, anesthesia method, whether the surgery took place in an ambulatory surgery center or a hospital outpatient department, operation time in minutes, primary insurance type, race, ethnicity, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and categories for billed procedure codes., Results: During the period of 2016 to 2017, 8,717 claims were included, with a mean charge per claim of $4,865. General anesthesia was associated with higher charges than local anesthesia. A procedure at a hospital outpatient department was associated with an approximately 48.2% increase in the total charge compared with that at an ambulatory surgery center. A 1-minute increase in the operation time was associated with a 0.3% increase in the total charge. Claims with antiemetics, antihistamines, benzodiazepines, intravenous fluids, narcotic agents, or preoperative antibiotics were associated with higher total charges than claims that did not bill for these. Compared with endoscopic procedures, open procedures had a 44.3% decrease in the total charges., Conclusions: This comprehensive multivariable model has validated that general anesthesia, hospital-based surgery, the use of antibiotics and opioids, longer operative times, and endoscopic CTR significantly increased the cost of surgery., Type of Study/level of Evidence: Economic and decision analyses II., (Copyright © 2022 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)