Search

With funding from The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Generalist Physician Initiative, Dartmouth Medical School (DMS), New York Medical College (NYMC), and Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine (VCU-SOM) adopted early community-based training models for longitudinal clinical experiences. These schools developed different evaluation strategies to assess these models. This paper describes each program, the method used to evaluate an aspect of the program, lessons learned about early clinical teaching and learning, and challenges encountered. Each program used cross-sectional evaluation, and the analysis methods included descriptive statistics, chi-square, t-tests, analysis of variance, and generalized linear models. Dartmouth determined that the type of preceptor does not greatly influence the development of clinical skills, although case-specific differences were discovered. NYMC learned that students taught clinical skills in community-based settings performed as well as or better than their peers who received early patient experience on hospital wards. Virginia Commonwealth discovered that community experiences contributed positively to students' education, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. Students value early clinical experiences and make important achievements in clinical skills and knowledge development, although logistic challenges exist in conducting these courses. Evaluations are critical to ensure competency, and faculty development must be linked to the evaluation process.

During implementation of a new Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) policy in New York State, decisions by 233 nursing home patients of their surrogates were evaluated. Eighteen patients with capacity (mean age +/- SD = 76.4 +/- 12.1 years) chose DNR; 30 patients with capacity (mean age +/- SD = 76.2 +/- 10.7 years) chose to be resuscitated (CODE); 54 patients without capacity, (mean age +/- SD = 86.1 +/- 9.1 years) had surrogates who chose DNR; and 131 patients without capacity and with surrogates (mean age +/- SD = 81.9 +/- 9.8 years) remained CODE. Most patients with capacity who chose DNR had multiple sclerosis, while most choosing CODE had strokes. Most patients who lacked capacity had dementia. Forty-five percent of surrogates did not respond regarding CODE status during the three-month study interval, and 10% wanted additional time to decide. Patient age appeared to be a factor in surrogate choice for DNR but not in patients with capacity making their own decision. Reasons for patients with capacity choosing DNR are discussed; perceived quality of life and premorbid feelings by patients help in the decision-making process.