Search

Objective: Analysis of data from the Burns Registry of Australia and New Zealand (BRANZ) to determine the extent of variation between participating units in treatment and in specific outcomes during the first 4 years of its operation., Design: BRANZ, an initiative of the Australian and New Zealand Burn Association, is a clinical quality registry developed in accordance with the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare national operating principles., Setting: Patients with burn injury who fulfil pre-defined criteria are transferred to and managed in designated burn units. There are 17 adult and paediatric units in Australia and New Zealand that manage almost all patients with significant burn injury. Twelve of these units treat adult patients., Participants: Data on 7184 adult cases were contributed by ten acute adult burn units to the registry between July 2010 and June 2014.Major outcomes: In-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay, skin grafting rates, and rates of admission to intensive care units., Results: Considerable variations in unit profiles (including numbers of patients treated), in treatment and in outcomes were identified., Conclusions: Despite the highly centralised delivery of care to patients with severe or complex burn injury, and the relatively small number of specialist burn units, we found significant variation between units in clinical management and in outcomes. BRANZ data from its first 4 years of operation support its feasibility and the value of further development of the registry. Based on these results, the focus of ongoing research is to improve understanding of the reasons for variations in practice and of their effect on outcomes for patients, and to develop evidence-informed clinical guidelines for burn management in Australia and New Zealand.

Background: This study was performed to review the changing pattern of incidence of severe craniomaxillofacial (CMF) trauma in Auckland over 8 years (1989-1997) and to audit the involvement of the regional plastic surgery service., Methods: A review of prospectively collected admission data of patients admitted to the Auckland Hospital Department of Critical Care Medicine (DCCM) with severe CMF trauma during 1997. A comparison is made with similar data from 1989. Injury severity was defined using the Injury Severity Score (ISS)., Results: Twenty-six patients with severe CMF trauma were admitted to Auckland Hospital DCCM in 1997. Their average ISS was 35. Eighty per cent had a significant head injury. Sixty-two per cent had injuries due to road traffic accidents (RTA) and 42% had positive blood alcohol levels, including 37% of the RTA victims. Twenty-three per cent had their surgical care provided by the regional plastic surgery service. In 1989, 55 patients were admitted to DCCM with severe CMF trauma. The average ISS was 36. Ninety-five per cent had a significant head injury. Seventy-three per cent had injuries due to RTA and 55% had positive blood alcohol, including 60% of the RTA group., Conclusions: Patients with severe CMF trauma make up a significant proportion of trauma admissions to DCCM and have a high incidence of life-threatening injuries. A multidisciplinary approach is essential. The nature and severity of these injuries has not changed over the last decade. There has been a clear decrease in the incidence of these injuries. This seems to be due to a profound decrease in the rate of RTA associated with alcohol intoxication.