Search

Specialist insect herbivores make up a substantial fraction of Earth's biodiversity; however, they exploit a minority of plant lineages. For instance, in the eastern United States and Canada, ~25% of bee species are pollen specialists, but they are hosted by a small fraction of the native, animal‐pollinated angiosperms in the region: Only 6% of plant genera and 3% of families support pollen‐specialist bees. It is unclear why some plant lineages host specialist bees while others do not. We know that at least some specialist bees use plant taxa that are avoided by generalists, suggesting that specialist bees favor plants with low‐quality pollen, potentially as a strategy to escape competition or obtain protection from natural enemies. There is also evidence that specialist bees prefer superabundant host plants. Here we investigate whether pollen quality and plant abundance predict patterns of host use by specialist bees in eastern North America. Through field observations, we find that plants hosting specialist bees are frequent sources of pollen for generalists, suggesting that their pollen is not generally avoided by bees due to poor pollen quality. In addition, our analysis of a large citizen‐science data set shows that regional abundance strongly predicts which plant genera in the eastern United States host pollen‐specialist bees. Our results show that bees specialize on regionally abundant—but not necessarily low‐quality—plant lineages. These plant lineages may provide more opportunities for the evolution of specialists and lower likelihood of specialist extinction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The phenologies of co‐occurring trees and spring‐blooming understory herbs in northeastern North American hardwood forests appear to be regulated by different environmental drivers – air temperature and soil temperature/snowpack, respectively. Accordingly, it has been hypothesized that climate change–driven asymmetry in the advancement of canopy leaf‐out relative to the timing of understory growth could reduce photosynthetic rates and reproductive success of understory herbs through greater early‐season shading.To determine whether trees and spring‐flowering forest herbs are advancing their phenologies at different rates with respect to increasing global temperatures, we examined the phenological responses to warming of 10 species of trees and 11 species of spring‐flowering forest herbs (8045 observations from 965 sites) in northeastern North America using 13 years of data collected by citizen scientists under the auspices of the USA‐National Phenology Network.Contrary to expectation, the degree of advancement of leaf‐out as a function of temperature was greater in spring‐flowering forest herbs than in trees, with a mean response rate of −4.9 days/°C (95% BCI [−5.2, −4.6]) for spring‐flowering forest herbs vs. −3.3 days/°C (95% BCI [−3.5, −3.1]) for trees. However, the response to temperature was not consistent across the latitudinal range, with spring‐flowering forest herbs responding more strongly to warming than trees at middle (40–44°N) and higher (45–48°N) latitudes but not at lower latitudes (35–39°N).Synthesis. In contrast to previous suggestions, our study shows spring‐flowering forest herbs advancing their phenology at a higher rate than trees with respect to warming through most of the latitudinal range investigated, which could translate into a longer growing season and increased carbon uptake for spring‐flowering forest herbs as spring temperatures rise. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]