Search

Background: High-volume center surgery and gynecologic oncology care are associated with improved outcomes for women with uterine cancer. Referral patterns, from biopsy through to chemotherapy, may have patients interacting with high-volume centers for all, a portion, or none of their care. The relative frequency, the underlying factors that contribute to referral, and the potential impact of these referral patterns on treatment outcomes are unknown.Objective: We sought to analyze the referral patterns and subsequent impact of care sites on treatment for women with high- and low-risk uterine cancer.Study Design: This is a population-based retrospective cohort study of uterine cancer cases from 2004 through 2009 in North Carolina. Using state cancer registry files linked to Medicare, Medicaid, and private payer insurance claims, we analyzed referral and treatment patterns by annual surgical volume (high ≥12/y). We examined clinical and demographic factors associated with referral and used modified Poisson regression to evaluate risk of referral, lymphadenectomy, and chemotherapy. Stratified Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine survival.Results: A total of 2053 women were analyzed, including 34% (n = 677) with grade 3 histology. Of 1630 (80%) women with preoperative biopsies, referral patterns (biopsy to surgery) were: low volume to high volume (n = 652, 40%), followed by high volume to high volume (n = 605, 37%), then low volume to low volume (n = 318, 20%), and the rare high volume to low volume (n = 50, 3%). Women retained in low-volume centers after biopsy were older, were less likely to have private insurance, and had more comorbidities. High-risk histology (aRR, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.25) was positively associated with referral, while Medicaid insurance was negatively associated with referral (aRR, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.96). Most women (74%, n = 1557) had surgery at high-volume centers. Lymphadenectomy was less likely at low-volume centers (aRR, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.77). Similarly, for high-risk patients, the relationship between low-volume center surgery and subsequent chemotherapy was aRR, 0.71 (95% confidence interval, 0.48-1.02). Of 290 women who received chemotherapy, the referral patterns (surgery to chemotherapy) were: high volume-all (high volume to high volume), high volume-hybrid (high volume to low volume, or low volume to high volume), and high volume-none (low volume to low volume). In all, 36% (n = 104/290) received chemotherapy at a low-volume center, the majority (68%, n = 71/104) of whom were referred from high-volume centers after surgery. Crude, unadjusted mortality risk of chemotherapy recipients differed by referral pattern (surgery to chemotherapy): high volume-all patients (hazard ratio, 1.0; referent), followed by high volume-hybrid (hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-1.91) then high volume-none patients (RR, 1.95; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-3.08).Conclusion: Most women with uterine cancer treated at high-volume centers arrive through referral, which is affected by age and type of insurance, in addition to histology. For high-risk women who require chemotherapy, survival may be related to the extent of treatment received at high-volume centers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Recent clinical trials support de-escalation of adjuvant radiation therapy following lumpectomy in some older women with low-risk HR+ breast cancers planning to take endocrine therapy. The adoption of these findings into clinical practice, and the effectiveness of de-escalated therapy in real-world populations, remain under investigation., Materials and Methods: We evaluated use of adjuvant radiation therapy and/or endocrine therapy among older women with T1-2 node-negative, HR+ breast cancer in the United States between 2007 and 2011. The study included patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare linked database and the North Carolina Cancer Information and Population Health Resource database., Results: Radiation therapy was received by 65.5% of patients, with no decrease over time. Older women and those with T2 (compared to T1) tumors were less likely to receive radiation therapy. In propensity-adjusted analyses, both radiation therapy alone (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67-0.84) and radiation + endocrine therapy (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.54-0.69) were associated with significantly lower recurrence risk compared to endocrine therapy alone. Non-adherence to endocrine therapy was common (37%) and similar across groups. With a median follow-up of 48 months (range 13-84), we were not able to detect an association of non-adherence with recurrence risk in endocrine therapy-containing treatment arms., Conclusion: Most older women with stage I HR+ breast cancers continue to receive radiation, at higher rates than patients with node-negative stage II tumors. These findings suggest that while multiple evidence-based treatment options exist in these patients, improvements are needed to ensure that radiation therapy is applied equitably and rationally., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Meyer is currently employed by Roche, Inc. in a non-development role; Dr. Meng is founder and owner of the contract research company Element Stat Inc.; Jason Rotter is currently employed by Mathematica, Inc. Their work on this manuscript was done as employees of UNC Chapel Hill. The other authors have no current or past conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Adults aged ≥65 years who are dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid are an at-risk group in health care. However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, the outcomes of women with gynecologic cancers in this population are unknown., Methods: The current study was a population-based cohort study of North Carolina state cancer registry cases of uterine, ovarian, cervical, and vulvar/vaginal cancers (2003-2009), with linked enrollment in Medicare and state Medicaid. Outcomes of all-cause mortality and stage of disease at the time of diagnosis were analyzed as a function of enrollment status using multivariate analysis and survival curves., Results: Of 4522 women aged ≥65 years (3702 of whom were enrolled in Medicare [82%] and 820 of whom were dually enrolled [18%]), there were 2286 cases of uterine (51%), 1587 cases of ovarian (35%), 302 cases of cervical (7%), and 347 cases of vulvar/vaginal (8%) cancers. Dual enrollees had increased all-cause mortality overall (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.34; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.19-1.49), and within each cancer site (uterine: aHR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.02-1.47]; ovarian: aHR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.05-1.49]; cervical: aHR, 1.34 [95% CI, 0.96-1.87]; and vulvar/vaginal: aHR, 1.93 [95% CI, 1.36-2.72]). Increased odds of advanced-stage disease at the time of diagnosis among dual enrollees was only present in patients with uterine cancer (adjusted odds ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.06-1.79). Stratified survival curves demonstrated the strongest disparities among women with early-stage uterine and early-stage vulvar/vaginal cancers., Conclusions: Women aged ≥65 years who were dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid were found to have an overall 34% increase in all-cause mortality after diagnosis with a gynecologic cancer compared with the non-dually enrolled Medicare population. Women with early-stage uterine and vulvar/vaginal cancers appeared to have the most disparate outcomes. Because these malignancies are generally curable, they have the most potential for benefit from targeted interventions., (© 2015 American Cancer Society.)