1. Cost-benefit analysis of rapid diagnostic tests for Plasmodium vivax malaria in South Korea: A mathematical modeling study.
- Author
-
Jung Ho Kim, Jiyeon Suh, Woon Ji Lee, Heun Choi, Jong-Dae Kim, Changsoo Kim, Jun Yong Choi, Jeehyun Lee, and Joon-Sup Yeom
- Subjects
COST effectiveness ,PLASMODIUM vivax ,MALARIA ,HEALTH insurance ,DELAY differential equations - Abstract
Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have been widely used for diagnosing Plasmodium vivax malaria, especially in resource-limited countries. However, the impact of RDTs on the overall P. vivax malaria incidence and national medical costs has not been evaluated. We assessed the effects of RDT initiation on P. vivax malaria incidence and overall medical expenditures in South Korea, a country with a qualified medical environment, and performed a cost-benefit analysis from the payer's perspective. 방법 We developed a dynamic compartmental model for P. vivax malaria transmission in South Korea using delay differential equations. The model was calibrated to the civilian malaria incidences in 2014-2018 reported by Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We then estimated averted malaria cases and total medical costs from two diagnostic scenarios, namely, microscopy only and both microscopy and RDT. Medical costs, including the prices of RDT and microscopy, were extracted based on data of a hospital where located in areas at risk for P. vivax malaria and validated by data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, which is a nationwide, mandatory social insurance database of South Korea. We conducted a cost-benefit analysis of RDT using the incremental benefit cost ratio (IBCR) considering only medical costs and performed a sensitivity analysis to reflect the uncertainties of model parameters, costs, and benefits. 결과 The results showed that 55.3% of new malaria cases were averted and saved $696,214 in medical costs in 10 years after RDT introduction due to the reduced risk of secondary infections from diagnosis delay. The estimated IBCR was 2.5, indicating that RDT implementation was beneficial compared to microscopy alone. The IBCR was sensitive to a short latency period, infectious period, and diagnosis time reduction and provided beneficial results in a benefit over $10.6 or RDT cost under $39.7. 결론 The introduction of RDT significantly reduced malaria incidence and reduced medical costs. Moreover, the cost-benefit analysis demonstrated that RDTs introduction were beneficial over microscopy alone. These results support the need for the widespread adoption of RDTs and national health insurance coverage for RDT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020