Search

Previous studies have found marked increases in melanoma incidence. The increase among young people in northern England was especially apparent among females. However, overall 5-year survival has greatly improved. The present study aimed to determine whether socioeconomic factors may be involved in both etiology and survival. All 224 cases of malignant melanoma diagnosed in patients aged 10-24 years during 1968-2003 were extracted from a specialist population-based regional registry. Negative binomial regression was used to examine the relationship between incidence and area-based measures of socioeconomic deprivation and small-area population density. Cox regression was used to analyze the relationship between survival and deprivation and population density. There was significantly decreased risk associated with living in areas of higher unemployment (relative risk per 1% increase in unemployment=0.93; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90-0.96, P<0.001). Survival was better in less deprived areas (hazard ratio (HR) per tertile of household overcrowding=1.52; 95% CI 1.05-2.20; P=0.026), but this effect was reduced in the period 1986-2003 (HR=0.61; 95% CI 0.40-0.92; P=0.018). This study found that increased risk of melanoma was linked with some aspects of greater affluence. In contrast, worse survival was associated with living in a more deprived area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Infection with human papillomavirus is an established risk factor for cervical carcinoma. However, the role of other environmental factors is less well established. To further investigate whether other agents may be involved, the authors have analyzed seasonal variation in cervical cancer with respect to month of birth and separately month of diagnosis. All 85 cases diagnosed in 15-24-yr-olds during the period 1968-2005 were extracted from the specialist population-based Northern Region Young Persons' Malignant Disease Registry. The chi-square heterogeneity test was used to assess overall nonuniform variation in month of birth and separately month of diagnosis. Poisson regression analysis was used to fit sinusoidal (harmonic) models to the data using month of birth and month of diagnosis in separate models. Based on month of birth, there was statistically significant heterogeneity ( p == .03) and a significant sinusoidal pattern, with an incidence peak involving births in the autumn months ( p == .03). Based on month of diagnosis, there was marginally significant heterogeneity ( p == .06). The evidence of seasonal variation around time of birth for cervical carcinoma is highly novel and suggests possible early etiological involvement of environmental factors. (Author correspondence: ) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study examined sex-specific patterns and temporal trends in the incidence of solid tumours in the Northern Region of England from 1968 to 2005. This updates earlier analyses from the region where sex was not considered in depth. Sex-specific analyses were carried out to determine whether sex differences might provide clues to aetiology. Methods: Details of 3576 cases, aged 0-24 years, were obtained from a specialist population-based cancer registry. There were 1843 males (886 aged 0-14 years and 957 aged 15-24 years) and 1733 females (791 aged 0-14 years and 942 aged 15-24 years). Age-standardized incidence rates (per million population) were calculated. Linear regression was used to analyze temporal trends in incidence and annual percentage changes were estimated. Analyses were stratified by sex and by age-group. Results: There were marked differences in incidence patterns and trends between males and females and also between age-groups. For males central nervous system (CNS) tumours formed the largest proportion of under- 15 cases and germ cell tumours was the largest group in the 15-24's, whilst for females CNS tumours dominated in the under-15's and carcinomas in the older group. For 0-14 year olds there were male-specific increases in the incidence of rhabdomyosarcoma (2.4% per annum; 95% CI: 0.2%-4.5%) and non-melanotic skin cancer (9.6%; 95% CI: 0.0%-19.2%) and female-specific increases for sympathetic nervous system tumours (2.2%; 95% CI: 0.4%-3.9%), gonadal germ cell tumours (8.6%; 95% CI: 4.3%-12.9%) and non-gonadal germ cell tumours (5.4%; 95% CI: 2.8%-7.9%). For 15-24 year olds, there were male-specific increases in gonadal germ cell tumours (1.9%; 95% CI: 0.3%-3.4%), non-gonadal germ cell tumours (4.4%; 95% CI: 1.1%-7.7%) and non-melanotic skin cancer (4.7%; 95% CI: 0.5%-8.9%) and female-specific increases for osteosarcoma (3.5%; 95% CI: 0.5%-6.5%), thyroid cancer (2.8%; 95% CI: 0.1%-5.6%) and melanoma (4.6%; 95% CI: 2.2%-7.1%). Conclusion: This study has highlighted notable differences between the sexes in incidence patterns and trends for solid tumours. Some of these sex-specific differences could have been obscured if males and females had been analysed together. Furthermore, they suggest aetiological differences or differential susceptibility to environmental factors between males and females. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]