Search

Centuries of bad mine-flooding practice have left a legacy of underground salt mine collapse and contaminated discharges, the scale of which is only slowly being revealed now that ground processes have caused instability over decades to >100 years. Geophysical methods are used for mapping ground subsidence and groundwater contamination at such sites but suffer individually from non-uniqueness and with the underlying mechanism and processes not being well understood. Here, to reduce uncertainty and maximize accuracy we recover subsurface models with structural similarity enforced via crossgradients joint inversion of seismic refraction and dc resistivity data for the top 40 m at former mining areas in Carrickfergus region of Northern Ireland. The models in combination with multispectral image fusion, enable us to identify hitherto unknown mechanism of deformation and compositional changes consistent with the Chebotarev geochemical evolution of groundwater. We found evidence of concealed gravitational slump structures interpreted as being caused by water ingress weakening the gypsum-bearing marl bedrock (via gypsum dissolution and increased fluid pressures within marl) and leading to gravitational gliding deformation, expressed as curved subsidence bands and stepped thrusts coincident with surface zones of brine-mud seepage and sinkhole collapse. Our results have wide-ranging implications for best-practice assessment and management of abandoned flooded salt mines and the hazards they pose to ground stability and water resources world-wide. • Joint inversion of multi-physical data is combined with geospectral image fusion • Improved imaging of ground stability and water pollution at abandoned flooded mines • Finger-printing of groundwater and geological hazards facilitates future management [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is a rapid geophysical technique that we have used to assess four illegally buried waste locations in Northern Ireland. GPR allowed informed positioning of the less-rapid, if more accurate use of electrical resistivity imaging (ERI). In conductive waste, GPR signal loss can be used to map the areal extent of waste, allowing ERI survey lines to be positioned. In less conductive waste the geometry of the burial can be ascertained from GPR alone, allowing rapid assessment. In both circumstances, the conjunctive use of GPR and ERI is considered best practice for cross-validation of results and enhancing data interpretation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]