Search

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to estimate total effective dose and cancer risk related to treatment monitoring and surveillance computed tomography (CT) scans in a cohort of patients diagnosed with lymphoma., Methods: 76 patients with head, neck, chest, abdomen or pelvis CT and whole-body positron emission tomography (PET)/CT were identified from an institutional lymphoma database; this included 54 (71%) patients with non-Hodgkin and 22 (29%) patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Average treatment and surveillance periods were 8 months (range, 3-14 mo) and 23 months (range, 1-40 mo), respectively. Radiation exposure was estimated from the dose-length product (DLP) for CT scans and milli-Curies and DLP for PET/CT scans. Cancer risk was estimated using the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation model., Results: During their treatment period, 45 patients had 161 CT exams and 39 patients had 73 PET/CT exams. Mean effective dose was 39.3 mSv (range, 7.1-100 mSv). During the surveillance period, 60 patients had 378 CT exams and 25 patients had 39 PET/CT exams. Mean effective dose was 53.2 mSv (range, 2.6-154 mSv). Seventeen of 76 (22.4%) patients had total cumulative doses greater than 100 mSv. The mean increase in estimated cancer risk was 0.40%; the greatest estimated risk to any one patient was 1.19%., Conclusion: Mean total effective dose and mean estimated cancer risk were low in patients with lymphoma undergoing serial imaging, suggesting that theoretical risks of radiation-induced cancer need not be a major consideration in radiologic follow-up., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To determine whether using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values rather than serum creatinine levels to identify patients with renal insufficiency facilitates any substantial change in the number of outpatients scheduled for computed tomography (CT) who are considered at increased risk for contrast medium-induced nephropathy., Materials and Methods: The study was HIPAA compliant and institutional review board approved for medical chart review; the requirement for informed patient consent was waived. Patients (n = 5138; 2569 women, 2569 men, 753 African Americans, 4385 non-African Americans) examined during a 2-year period formed the final study group after exclusion of patients undergoing dialysis (n = 49), for whom no age data were recorded (n = 9), and younger than 18 years (n = 113). Patient age, sex, and race and the blood urea nitrogen, albumin, and serum creatinine levels most recently measured within 6 months before CT were obtained from the electronic medical records. The number of patients with creatinine levels higher than 1.4 mg/dL was directly compared with the number of patients with eGFR values (calculated with four- and six-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD] equations) lower than 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) by using the two-tailed McNemar test. For 2689 patients, data to calculate the eGFR by using the four-variable equation were available, and for 2005 patients, data to calculate the eGFR by using the six-variable equation were available., Results: Among the outpatients scheduled to undergo CT, the percentage of patients with an eGFR lower than 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) was significantly greater than the percentage of patients with a creatinine level higher than 1.4 mg/dL for both the four-variable (412 [15.3%] vs 166 [6.2%] of 2689 patients) and the six-variable (346 [17.3%] vs 117 [5.8%] of 2005 patients) MDRD equation groups (P < .001)., Conclusion: A significantly higher number of outpatients scheduled for contrast medium-enhanced CT met the National Kidney Foundation criteria for renal insufficiency when the MDRD equations were used to estimate the glomerular filtration rate compared with the number of outpatients who met the criteria on the basis of elevated creatinine levels., ((c) RSNA, 2008.)