Search

Objective: To estimate the change in indications for scheduled deliveries during the Ohio Perinatal Quality Collaborative's initiative to decrease scheduled deliveries for nonmedical indications before 39 weeks of gestation., Methods: Documented indications for scheduled deliveries between 36 0/7 and 38 6/7 weeks were categorized as: strong medically accepted reasons for delivery; intermediate acceptability; and unnecessary before 39 weeks. We describe each of these indication categories as a proportion of all deliveries in the participating hospitals between October 2008 and December 2009., Results: The percentage of scheduled deliveries that were unnecessary before 39 weeks or had intermediate indications decreased over time (P=.03). There were 145 fewer with intermediate reasons and 265 fewer that were unnecessary when the first 4 months of the project were compared with the last 4 months. Strong medical indications as a percentage of all deliveries did not change significantly over time (P=.99)., Conclusion: Our quality collaborative reduced scheduled deliveries of medically unnecessary and intermediate indications for delivery at 36 0/7 and 38 6/7 weeks. However, scheduled deliveries with strong medical indication did not change significantly over time., Level of Evidence: III.

Objective: To determine to what degree attending physicians contribute to cost variations in the care of ventilator-dependent newborns., Data Sources: Clinical data were merged with hospital financial data describing daily ancillary care costs during the first two weeks of life for 132 extremely low-birthweight newborns. In addition, each patient's chart was reviewed and illness severity graded using both SNAP and CRIB scores., Study Design: This was a retrospective cohort of infants with birth weights of less than 1,001 grams and respiratory distress syndrome requiring mechanical ventilation in the first day of life. From birth up to two weeks of life, each received care directed by only one of 11 faculty neonatologists in a single university hospital. Data were analyzed stratified by these physicians. t-Test, ANOVA, and chi-square were used to assess bivariate data. For continuous data, log linear regressions were used., Principal Findings: After controlling for illness severity, when stratified by physicians, there were significant variances in the costs of ancillary resources for the study infants (p < .0001). Twenty-nine percent of the variance was attributable to whether or not the hospital day included the use of a ventilator. Physician identity explained only 5.6 percent (p < .0001)., Conclusions: Physician identity was significant but explained less than 6 percent of the total variance in ancillary costs. Whether or not a ventilator was used during care was far more important. We conclude that for very sick babies during the first two weeks of care, reducing variations in ancillary services utilization among neonatologists will yield only modest savings.

The purpose of this study was to test, refine, and extend a statistical model that adjusts neonatal intensive care costs for a very low birth weight infant's day of life and birth weight category. Subjects were 62 infants with birth weights below 1,501 g who were born and cared for in a university hospital until discharged home alive. Subjects were stratified into 250-g birth weight categories. Clinical and actual daily room and ancillary-resource costs for each day of care of each infant were tabulated. Data were analyzed by using a nonlinear regression procedure specifying two separate for modeling. The modeling was performed with data sets that both included and excluded room costs. The former set of data were used for generating a model applicable for comparing interhospital performances and the latter for comparing interphysician performances. The results confirm the existence of a strong statistical relationship between an infant's day of life and both total hospital costs and the isolated costs for ancillary-resource alone (P < 0.0001). A refined series of statistical models have been generated that are applicable to the assessment of either interhospital or interphysician costs associated with providing inpatient care to very low birth weight infants.

Objective: To assess the effect of an early discharge program on the use of hospital-based health care services in the first 3 months of life., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Setting: Metropolitan university hospital and a children's hospital., Patients: Term infants cared for in a single term nursery, before and after implementation of an early discharge program., Intervention: Early discharge program., Methods: Linking of the birth hospital and the children's hospital records and chart review., Outcome Measures: Pattern of emergency department visits and rehospitalizations in the first 3 months of life., Results: The early discharge group had a shorter stay, 32 +/- 21 hours (mean +/- SD) than the control group (48 +/- 22 hours). There was no effect of early discharge on mean age at rehospitalization, rehospitalization rate, or reason for rehospitalization. Twenty-eight percent of infants in both study and control groups had at least one emergency department visit by 3 months of age. There was no difference between study and control groups in mean age or frequency of emergency department visits. Maternal age and race had a significant effect on the odds of visiting the emergency department. For any maternal age, nonwhite mothers were more likely to visit the emergency department., Conclusions: Early discharge of newborn infants to inner city parents can be accomplished without increasing hospital-based resource use in the first 3 months of life provided coordinated postdischarge care and home visiting services are available.

The effect of a cost-containment program focused on decreasing the lengths of hospital stay of high-risk neonates was assessed by comparison of discharge weights and lengths of stay for 257 study infants, discharged from a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) after an early-discharge program began, with those of 477 control infants discharged during a prior 1-year period. Demographic data and costs, as well as data on emergency department use and hospital readmissions, were included in the comparisons. There was a significant decrease in mean discharge weight and length of stay for infants in the study group. During a 7-month period, an estimated 2073 days of hospital care and approximately $2,700,000 in hospital charges were saved, or $10,609 per infant discharged. The cost of instituting and maintaining the program was $120,413, or $468 per infant. Seven visits were made to the emergency department by the study infants during the first 14 days after discharge. One infant was readmitted for a 4-day hospital stay for suspected sepsis. Significantly earlier discharge of high-risk neonates produced a decrease in hospital charges without causing excessive morbidity. The success of the program was coincident and presumed related to the institution of multiple elements focused toward family support through early-discharge planning. The reduction in hospital charges was 30 times higher than program expenses.

Objective: The Medicus Patient Classification System (PCS) and the lameter Acuity Index Method (AIM) are two proprietary scoring systems in common use for stratifying patient populations before making comparisons of the medical care they receive. In this study the validities of these scores were tested when the scores were used to evaluate cost-related elements of high-risk neonatal intensive care., Methods: A total of 687 surviving inborn infants cared for in a university hospital newborn intensive care unit provided data for these analyses. The infants were stratified into the five diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) for surviving neonates (386, 387, 388, 389, and 390), as determined from their discharge diagnoses. Each infant's summed total of daily PCS scores, a single AIM score, and birth weight were extracted from the hospital's decision-support data files and used as independent variables in regression analyses to determine correlations with lengths of hospital stay, ancillary resource utilizations, and hospital charges., Results: The Medicus scores, which are computed prospectively on a daily basis, when summed retrospectively, correlated highly with lengths of stay, ancillary resource utilization, and associated hospital charges. The lameter scores, which are assigned retrospectively, were far less predictive of these outcome variables and generally worse than birth weight in explaining outcome variances., Conclusions: Although in common use, the lameter AIM could not be validated as an appropriate method for assessing cost-related outcomes after newborn intensive care. The Medicus PCS produced daily scores that, when summed after patient discharge, correlated highly with the same outcome variables. There is a need to test further these and other proprietary methods now used to compare the cost-related elements of care provided by different hospitals and physicians.