Search

Objective: Interstage readmissions are common in infants with single ventricle congenital heart disease undergoing staged surgical palliation. We retrospectively examined readmissions during the interstage period., Design: Retrospective analysis., Setting: The Heart Center at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio., Patients: Newborns undergoing hybrid stage 1 palliation from January 2012 to December 2016 who survived to hospital discharge and were followed at our institution., Interventions: All patients underwent hybrid stage 1 palliation., Outcome Measures: Outcomes included (1) reason for interstage readmission; (2) feeding modality during interstage period; (3) major interstage adverse events; and (4) interstage mortality., Results: Study group comprised 57 patients. Five patients only admitted once during the interstage period for scheduled cardiac catheterization were included in the no readmission group. Therefore, 43 patients (75%) had a total of 87 interstage readmissions. Fourteen patients had 15 major interstage adverse events accounting for 17% of total readmissions. Stroke (n = 1); sepsis (n = 1); pericardial effusion requiring drainage (n = 1); mesenteric ischemia (n = 1); shock (n = 1); and cardiac catheterization requiring intervention (n = 11)-ductal stent balloon angioplasty (n = 3), enlargement of atrial septal defect/stent placement (n = 3), retrograde aortic arch stenosis (n = 4). Thirty-three readmissions were secondary to gastrointestinal/feeding issues; 15 cyanosis; 15 work of breathing; and 9 asymptomatic patients. Four patients suffered interstage deaths (7%). Five patients (9%) spent >30 days in the hospital during the interstage period. Of the 47 newborns (82%) discharged exclusively orally feeding, 74% remained all orally feeding throughout interstage period. No patient discharged with tube feedings learned to eat during the interstage period., Conclusion: Interstage readmissions are common in the hybrid patient population. Seventeen percent were secondary to major adverse events. Interstage mortality was 7%. Future studies to identify interventions aimed at decreasing feeding issues and viral bronchiolitis in this tenuous patient population will hopefully improve quality outcomes, reduce readmissions, and lessen health care costs., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Swallowing dysfunction is a known complication for infants with complex congenital heart disease (CHD), but few studies have examined swallowing outcomes following the hybrid procedure for stage 1 palliation in children with single ventricle physiology., Objectives: (1) Identify the incidence of aspiration in all infants with single ventricle physiology who underwent the hybrid procedure and (2) Compare results of clinical bedside and instrumental swallowing evaluations to examine the predictive value of a less invasive swallowing assessment for this population of high-risk infants., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort chart review study. All patients with single-ventricle physiology who underwent the hybrid procedure received a referral for subsequent instrumental swallow assessment during a 4-year period. Results from clinical bedside evaluations were compared to those of the instrumental assessment., Results: Fifty infants were included in this study. During instrumental swallow assessment, aspiration was observed in 28% of infants following the hybrid procedure. Normal swallowing function was identified in 44% of infants, and 28% demonstrated laryngeal penetration. Neither length of intubation nor prematurity were found to be predictors of aspiration. Thirty-six of these infants were assessed via clinical bedside evaluation prior to the instrumental evaluation. The sensitivity of the clinical bedside evaluation was 0.73 and the specificity was 0.92., Conclusions: This study reports on a cohort of infants with single ventricle physiology following the hybrid procedure and found the incidence of aspiration to be lower than previously reported. Improved clinical bedside evaluation guidelines are needed so that clinicians can predict more reliably which infants are at risk for aspiration following the hybrid procedure., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Electronic medical records (EMRs) have the potential to facilitate the design of large cluster-randomized trials (CRTs)., Objective: To describe the design of a CRT of clinical decision support to improve diabetes care and outcomes., Methods: In the Diabetes Improvement Group-Intervention Trial (DIG-IT), we identified and balanced preassignment characteristics of 12,675 diabetic patients cared for by 147 physicians in 24 practices of 2 systems using the same vendor's EMR. EMR-facilitated disease management was system A's experimental intervention; system B interventions involved patient empowerment, with or without disease management. For our sample, we: (1) identified characteristics associated with response to interventions or outcomes; (2) summarized feasible partitions of 10 system A practices (2 groups) and 14 system B practices (3 groups) using intra-cluster correlation coefficients (ICCs) and standardized differences; (3) selected (blinded) partitions to effectively balance the characteristics; and (4) randomly assigned groups of practices to interventions., Results: In System A, 4,306 patients, were assigned to 2 groups of practices; 8,369 patients in system B were assigned to 3 groups of practices. Nearly all baseline outcome variables and covariates were well-balanced, including several not included in the initial design. DIG-IT's balance was superior to alternative partitions based on volume, geography or demographics alone., Conclusions: EMRs facilitated rigorous CRT design by identifying large numbers of patients with diabetes and enabling fair comparisons through preassignment balancing of practice sites. Our methods can be replicated in other settings and for other conditions, enhancing the power of other translational investigations.

A web-based service was developed through which patients can obtain second opinions from physicians. Factors addressed included incorporating e-appointments into a medical practice, consolidating different approaches to second opinions, complying with disparate state licensing regulations, and communicating the program's features to providers and patients.