Search

Postfabrication carcass component weights of 517 crossbred wether lambs were analyzed to evaluate 4 terminal-sire breeds. Wethers were produced over 3 yr from single-sire matings of 22 Columbia, 22 USMARC-Composite (Composite), 21 Suffolk, and 17 Texel rams to adult Rambouillet ewes. Lambs were reared to weaning in an extensive western rangeland production system and finished in a feedlot on a high-energy finishing diet. When wethers reached a mean BW of 54.4, 61.2, or 68.0 kg, they were transported to The Ohio State University abattoir for harvest. After refrigeration for approximately 24 h, chilled carcass weight (CCW) was measured, carcasses were fabricated according to Style A of Institutional Meat Purchase Specifications, and postfabrication weights were recorded. At comparable numbers of days on feed, Suffolk-sired lambs had heavier (P < 0.04) neck, breast, shoulder, foreshank, rack, loin, leg, sirloin, roast-ready rack, trimmed loin, and boneless leg cuts than progeny of the other sire breeds. Boneless sirloins were heavier (P < 0.01) for Suffolk-sired than Composite-sired lambs but did not differ from those for Columbia- or Texel-sired lambs. Columbia- and Suffolk-sired lambs had heavier (P < 0.01) hindshanks than Texel-sired lambs. Suffolk-sired lambs had heavier (P < 0.01) high-value cuts (rack, loin, leg, and sirloin) and trimmed high-value cuts than progeny of the other sire breeds. Cutting loss (CCW - wholesale cut weights) and high-value trimming loss were greatest (P < 0.02) for Suffolk-sired lambs and least for Texel- and Composite-sired lambs. Sire breed did not affect (P > 0.06) flank weight. Data adjusted to comparable CCW reduced the number of significant sire-breed effects and changed sire-breed rankings of carcass component weights, for which sire breeds differed. After adjusting, Suffolk-sired lambs had lighter (P < 0.05) loins than Columbia- and Composite-sired lambs, Composite-sired lambs had heavier (P < 0.05) high-value cuts than Suffolk-sired lambs, and Suffolk- and Columbia-sired lambs had heavier (P < 0.05) necks than Texel-sired lambs. At predicted backfat thickness of 6.6 mm, Composite-sired lambs had a greater (P < 0.05) percentage of high-value cuts than Suffolk-sired lambs before but not after trimming. Producers can use these results to select terminal-sire breeds that will complement their production system and improve lamb value.

This study was conducted to quantify differences in feed efficiency among 4 sire breeds using records from 1,109 crossbred lambs over 3 yr. Lambs were produced from mating Columbia, USMARC-Composite (Composite), Suffolk, and Texel rams to adult Rambouillet ewes. After weaning, lambs were finished on a high-energy diet in group-fed pens. Efficiency was assessed at 45 and 90 d on study, 50 and 60 kg of BW, and 6.6 and 9.1 mm of fat depth between the 12th and 13th ribs. Sire breed affected most of the traits that were measured. At 90 d, Suffolk-sired lambs had gained 13 to 19% more BW (P < 0.001), were 7 to 13% heavier (P < 0.001), and had consumed 4 to 11% more (P < 0.001) ME than the other breed crosses. However, at 90 d, G:F (59.9 vs. mean of 56.2 g BW gain/Mcal of ME; P < 0.01) and residual BW gain (RG; 0.94 vs. -0.33 kg BW; P < 0.05) were greater for Suffolk-sired lambs than for the other 3 sire breeds. Also, RG for Suffolk-sired lambs was greater (P < 0.01) at 6.6 and 9.1 mm of fat depth (0.62 vs. -0.24 kg and 0.87 vs. -0.33 kg of BW, respectively) and at 60 kg of BW (0.73 vs. 0.31 kg of BW) than for the other sire breeds. At 90 d, Columbia-sired lambs had the greatest (P < 0.01) residual feed intake (RFI; 7.01 vs. mean of -2.33 Mcal ME for the 3 other sire breeds). At 60 kg of BW, Texel- and Composite- (-2.34 Mcal ME, combined) had more favorable (P < 0.01) RFI than Columbia-sired lambs (6.42 Mcal ME), and Suffolk-sired lambs (0.49 Mcal ME) were intermediate and not different from the other 3 sire breeds. At 6.6 mm of fat depth, Columbia- and Suffolk- (3.30 Mcal ME, combined) had greater (P < 0.001) RFI than Texel-sired lambs (-4.23 Mcal ME); at 9.1 mm of fat depth, Columbia-sired lambs had the greatest (P < 0.05) RFI (7.35 vs. -2.11 Mcal ME for the other breeds combined). In summary, except for ME intake at 90 d, Suffolk-sired lambs were equal or superior to Columbia-, Composite-, and Texel-sired lambs for BW, BW gain, ME intake, G:F, RFI, and RG to 90 d, 60 kg of BW, and 9.1 mm of fat depth. Breed rankings were consistent across the study period for G:F and RG, but rankings changed over time for RFI.