1. Intensification differentially affects the delivery of multiple ecosystem services in subtropical and temperate grasslands.
- Author
-
Paudel, Shishir, Gomez-Casanovas, Nuria, Boughton, Elizabeth H., Chamberlain, Samuel D., Wagle, Pradeep, Peterson, Brekke L., Bajgain, Rajen, Starks, Patrick J., Basara, Jefferey, Bernacchi, Carl J., DeLucia, Evan H., Goodman, Laura E., Gowda, Prasanna H., Reuter, Ryan, Sparks, Jed P., Swain, Hilary M., Xiao, Xiangming, and Steiner, Jean L.
- Subjects
- *
ECOSYSTEM services , *ECOSYSTEMS , *GREENHOUSE gases , *AGRICULTURAL intensification , *NATURAL resources management , *GRASSLANDS , *PLANT diversity - Abstract
Intensification, the process of intensifying land management to enhance agricultural goods, results in "intensive" pastures that are planted with productive grasses and fertilized. These intensive pastures provide essential ecosystem services, including forage production for livestock. Understanding the synergies and tradeoffs of pasture intensification on the delivery of services across climatic regions is crucial to shape policies and incentives for better management of natural resources. Here, we investigated how grassland intensification affects key components of provisioning (forage productivity and quality), supporting (plant diversity) and regulating services (CO 2 and CH 4 fluxes) by comparing these services between intensive versus extensive pastures in subtropical and temperate pastures in the USDA Long-term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) Network sites in Florida and Oklahoma, USA over multiple years. Our results suggest that grassland intensification led to a decrease in measured supporting and regulating services, but increased forage productivity in temperate pastures and forage digestibility in subtropical pastures. Intensification decreased the net CO 2 sink of subtropical pastures while it did not affect the sink capacity of temperate pastures; and it also increased environmental CH 4 emissions from subtropical pastures and reduced CH 4 uptake in temperate pastures. Intensification enhanced the global warming potential associated with C fluxes of pastures in both ecoregions. Our study demonstrates that comparisons of agroecosystems in contrasting ecoregions can reveal important drivers of ecosystem services and general or region-specific opportunities and solutions to maintaining agricultural production and reducing environmental footprints. Further LTAR network-scale comparisons of multiple ecosystem services across croplands and grazinglands intensively vs extensively managed are warranted to inform the sustainable intensification of agriculture within US and beyond. Our results highlight that achieving both food security and environmental stewardship will involve the conservation of less intensively managed pastures while adopting sustainable strategies in intensively managed pastures. • Intensification did not increase forage productivity in subtropical pastures. • Intensification increased forage productivity in temperate pastures. • Intensification reduced supporting and regulating services in pastures. • Intensification reduced CO 2 sink capacity and increased CH 4 emissions of subtropical pastures. • Intensification increased the global warming potential associated with C fluxes in pastures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF