Search

Children with medical complexity (CMC) have complex chronic conditions with significant functional impairment, contributing to high caregiving demand. This study seeks to explore impacts of parental caregiving for CMC. Fifteen caregivers of CMC followed at a tertiary care hospital participated in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were concurrently analyzed using a qualitative description framework until thematic saturation was reached. Codes were grouped by shared concepts to clarify emergent findings. Four affected domains of parental caregiver experience with associated subthemes (in parentheses) were identified: personal (identity, physical health, mental health), family (marriage, siblings, family quality of life), social (time limitations, isolating lived experience), and financial (employment, medical costs, accessibility costs). Despite substantial challenges, caregivers identified two core determinants of personal resilience: others' support (hands-on, interpersonal, informational, material) and a positive outlook (self-efficacy, self-compassion, reframing expectations). Further research is needed to understand the unique needs and strengths of caregivers for this vulnerable population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: A provincial strategy to expand care coordination and integration of care for children with medical complexity (CMC) was launched in Ontario, Canada in 2015. A process evaluation of the roll-out examined the processes, mechanisms of impact, and contextual factors affecting the implementation of the Complex Care for Kids Ontario (CCKO) intervention strategy. Methods: This process evaluation was conducted and analyzed according to the United Kingdom Medical Research Council (UK-MRC) process evaluation framework. To evaluate the implementation of the CCKO intervention, a multi-method study design was used, including semi-structured interviews with 38 key informants and 10 families of CMC involved in CCKO. To further understand implementation details across regional sites, provincial-level implementation plans, and process documents were reviewed. Discussion: Strengths of CCKO included novel collaborations and partnerships between complex care teams, community partners and regional sites. Issues relating to communication and coordination across care sectors created challenges to holistic care coordination objectives. Provincial system fragmentation limited the ability of CCKO to provide seamless care coordination due to the multiple care sectors involved. Conclusion: This study adds to the understanding of the processes involved in a population-level care coordination intervention for CMC. Lessons learned through CCKO can help facilitate reproducibility and necessary adjustments of the intervention in different settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although COVID-19 vaccine safety in 5–11-year-old children has been documented, half of Ontarian children this age remain unvaccinated. This study aimed to assess caregivers' vaccine acceptance for 5–11-year-old children and identify factors associated with vaccine non-acceptance. A multi-language self-administered survey was sent to caregivers of 5–11-year-old children through schools and community health centers within the Greater Toronto Area from April–July 2022. Sociodemographic characteristics and immunization behaviours were collected for caregivers, their 5–11-year-old children, and any older siblings. The primary outcome, COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, was previous uptake of COVID-19 vaccine or caregiver intent to vaccinate for their 5–11-year-old child. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression. In total, 807 caregivers were included in analysis. Although 93 % of caregivers had received two doses of COVID-19 vaccine, 77 % had a 5–11-year-old child who received at least one dose of vaccine. Caregivers age was associated with vaccine acceptance (vs. < 40 years; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.1, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.4–3.1 for ages 40–49; aOR 2.8, 95 % CI 1.1–7.1 for ages ≥50 years). Immunization factors associated with vaccine acceptance included caregiver COVID-19 vaccination (aOR 38.1 vs. unvaccinated caregivers; 95 % CI 15.8–92.3), older siblings COVID-19 vaccination (aOR 49.2 vs. unvaccinated siblings; 95 % CI 18.3–132.3), and recent influenza vaccination for the child (aOR 6.9 vs. no influenza vaccine; 95 % CI 4.6–10.5). Among 189 caregivers with unvaccinated 5–11-year-old children, the most common reasons for non-acceptance were concerns about long-term side effects (59 %), lack of experience vaccinating children (41 %), and concerns that vaccines were developed too quickly (39 %). Acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination for 5–11-year-old children were associated with caregiver vaccine behaviors and sociodemographic factors. These findings highlight groups of caregivers that can be targeted for educational interventions and concerns that may be addressed to increase vaccine confidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To compare health care use and costs for youth with chronic health conditions before and after transfer from pediatric to adult health care services. METHODS: Youth born in Ontario, Canada, between April 1,1989, and April 1,1993, were assigned to 11 mutually exclusive, hierarchically arranged clinical groupings, including "complex" chronic conditions (CCCs], non-complex chronic conditions (N-CCCs), and chronic mental health conditions (CMHCs). Outcomes were compared between 2-year periods before and after transfer of pediatric services, the subjects' 18th birthday. RESULTS: Among 104 497 youth, mortality was highest in those with CCCs, but did not increase after transfer (1.3% vs 1.5%, P = .55). Costs were highest among youth with CCCs and decreased after transfer (before and after median [interquartile range]: $4626 [1253-21 435] vs $3733 [950-16 841], P < .001);Costs increased slightly for N-CCCs ($569 [263-1246] vs $589 [262-1333], P < .001), and decreased for CMHCs ($1774 [659-5977] vs $1545 [529-5128], P < .001). Emergency department visits increased only among youth with N-CCCs [P < .001). High-acuity emergency department visits increased CCCs (P = .04) and N-CCCs (P < .001), but not for CMHC (P = .59), who had the highest visit rate. Among the 11 individual conditions, costs only increased in youth with asthma (P < .001), and decreased (P < .05) in those with neurologic impairment, lupus, inflammatory bowel disease, and mood/affective disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric transfer to adult care is characterized by relatively stable short-term patterns of health service use and costs among youth with chronic conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Importance: Children with medical complexity (CMC) have chronic conditions and high health needs and may experience fragmented care., Objective: To compare the effectiveness of a structured complex care program, Complex Care for Kids Ontario (CCKO), with usual care., Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial used a waitlist variation for randomizing patients from 12 complex care clinics in Ontario, Canada, over 2 years. The study was conducted from December 2016 to June 2021. Participants were identified based on complex care clinic referral and randomly allocated into an intervention group, seen at the next available clinic appointment, or a control group that was placed on a waitlist to receive the intervention after 12 months., Intervention: Assignment of a nurse practitioner-pediatrician dyad partnering with families in a structured complex care clinic to provide intensive care coordination and comprehensive plans of care., Main Outcomes and Measures: Co-primary outcomes, assessed at baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 months postrandomization, were service delivery indicators from the Family Experiences With Coordination of Care that scored (1) coordination of care among health care professionals, (2) coordination of care between health care professionals and families, and (3) utility of care planning tools. Secondary outcomes included child and parent health outcomes and child health care system utilization and cost., Results: Of 144 participants randomized, 141 had complete health administrative data, and 139 had complete baseline surveys. The median (IQR) age of the participants was 29 months (9-102); 83 (60%) were male. At 12 months, scores for utility of care planning tools improved in the intervention group compared with the waitlist group (adjusted odds ratio, 9.3; 95% CI, 3.9-21.9; P < .001), with no difference between groups for the other 2 co-primary outcomes. There were no group differences for secondary outcomes of child outcomes, parent outcomes, and health care system utilization and cost. At 24 months, when both groups were receiving the intervention, no primary outcome differences were observed. Total health care costs in the second year were lower for the intervention group (median, CAD$17 891; IQR, 6098-61 346; vs CAD$37 524; IQR, 9338-119 547 [US $13 415; IQR, 4572-45 998; vs US $28 136; IQR, 7002-89 637]; P = .01)., Conclusions and Relevance: The CCKO program improved the perceived utility of care planning tools but not other outcomes at 1 year. Extended evaluation periods may be helpful in assessing pediatric complex care interventions., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02928757.

Objective: The primary objective was to quantify psychosocial risk in family caregivers (FCs) of children with medical complexity (CMC) during the COVID-19 pandemic using the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT). The secondary objectives were to compare this finding with the average PAT score of this population before the COVID-19 pandemic and to examine potential clinical predictors of psychosocial risk in FCs of CMC., Design: Cross-sectional study., Participants: FCs of CMC were recruited from the Long-Term Ventilation Clinic at The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. A total of 91 completed the demographic and PAT questionnaires online from 10 June 2021 through 13 December 2021., Main Outcome Measures: Mean PAT scores in FCs were categorised as 'Universal' low risk, 'Targeted' intermediate risk or 'Clinical' high risk. The effect of sociodemographic and clinical variables on overall PAT scores was assessed using multiple linear regression analysis. Comparisons with a previous study were made using Mann-Whitney tests and χ 2 analysis., Results: Mean (SD) PAT score was 1.34 (0.69). Thirty-one (34%) caregivers were classified as Universal, 43 (47%) as Targeted and 17 (19%) as Clinical. The mean PAT score (1.34) was significantly higher compared with the mean PAT score (1.17) found prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated an overall significant model, with the number of hospital admissions since the onset of COVID-19 being the only variable associated with the overall PAT score., Conclusion: FCs of CMC are experiencing significant psychosocial stress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Timely and effective interventions are warranted to ensure these individuals receive the appropriate support., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Complex Care for Kids Ontario (CCKO) is a multi-year strategy aimed at expanding a hub-and-spoke model to deliver coordinated care for children with medical complexity (CMC) across Ontario., Objective: This paper aims to identify the facilitators, barriers and lessons learned from the implementation of the Ontario CCKO strategy., Method: Alongside an outcome evaluation of the CCKO strategy, we conducted a process evaluation to understand the implementation context, process and mechanisms. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 38 healthcare leaders, clinicians and support staff from four regions involved in CCKO care delivery and/or governance., Results: Facilitators to CCKO implementation were sustained engagement of system-wide stakeholders, inter-organizational partnerships, knowledge sharing and family engagement. Barriers to CCKO implementation were resources and funding, fragmentation of care, aligning perspectives between providers and clinical staff recruitment and retention., Conclusion: A flexible approach is required to implement a complex, multi-centre policy strategy. Other jurisdictions considering such a model of care delivery would benefit from attention to contextual variations in implementation setting, building cross-sector engagement and buy-in, and offering continuous support for modifications to the intervention as and when required., (Copyright © 2021 Longwoods Publishing.)

Introduction: Having an infant admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is associated with increased parental stress, anxiety and depression. Enhanced support for parents may decrease parental stress and improve subsequent parent and child outcomes. The Coached, Coordinated, Enhanced Neonatal Transition (CCENT) programme is a novel bundled intervention of psychosocial support delivered by a nurse navigator that includes Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-based coaching, care coordination and anticipatory education for parents of high-risk infants in the NICU through the first year at home. The primary objective is to evaluate the impact of the intervention on parent stress at 12 months., Methods and Analysis: This is a multicentre pragmatic randomised controlled superiority trial with 1:1 allocation to the CCENT model versus control (standard neonatal follow-up). Parents of high-risk infants (n=236) will be recruited from seven NICUs across three Canadian provinces. Intervention participants are assigned a nurse navigator who will provide the intervention for 12 months. Outcomes are measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 4, 12 and 18 months. The primary outcome measure is the total score of the Parenting Stress Index Fourth Edition Short Form at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include parental mental health, empowerment and health-related quality of life for calculation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). A cost-effectiveness analysis will examine the incremental cost of CCENT versus usual care per QALY gained. Qualitative interviews will explore parent and healthcare provider experiences with the intervention., Ethics and Dissemination: Research ethics approval was obtained from Clinical Trials Ontario, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Ethics Board (REB), The Hospital for Sick Children REB, UBC Children's and Women's REB and McGill University Health Centre REB. Results will be shared with Canadian level III NICUs, neonatal follow-up programmes and academic forums., Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT03350243)., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Length of stay (LOS) is an important issue for many healthcare organizations. In-patients with extreme LOS account for a disproportionately large percentage of hospital costs. Our analysis of over 15,000 pediatric hospital discharges at The Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, Canada) between 2015 and 2016 revealed that the vast majority of patients with extreme LOS were discharged directly home, with only a minority receiving home-based services. Patients with the greatest LOS were accounted for by primarily four subspecialty services. Although this report outlines an analysis of pediatric in-patients, our findings and implications are relevant for all jurisdictions and populations as many acute care hospitals often "hold" patients with complex, chronic illness as in-patients for extended periods because alternate appropriate services may not exist or be available. Our case study highlights three key areas to improve quality of care for patients with extreme LOS: alternate levels of care, system resources and transitions to home., (Copyright © 2020 Longwoods Publishing.)

Objective: Children with medical complexity (CMC) are a growing population, yet training in complex care varies across pediatric residency programs. The purpose of this study was 1) to evaluate the effectiveness of a curriculum for pediatric residents in improving performance in a simulated clinical scenario, and 2) to explore residents' perceived self-efficacy in caring for CMC., Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted supplemented by qualitative inquiry. Pediatric residents from 2 residency programs were randomly assigned to participate in interactive modules on: 1) clinical assessment, care planning, and technological dependency or 2) noncomplex care topics. The primary outcome was mean score on an Observed Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) of tracheostomy care. Semistructured interviews were conducted postintervention and analyzed using qualitative content analysis., Results: Ninety-four eligible residents were randomized. Residents who attended all modules and the OSCE and consented to participate (intervention [n = 20] and control [n=24]) were included in the final analysis. At baseline, few (9%) reported being comfortable caring for CMC. There was no significant difference in mean OSCE score between intervention and control groups (39.0 ± 1.1 vs 38.0 ± 1.0, P = .48). Qualitative analysis revealed 3 emerging themes related to resident self-efficacy: building a system of care, navigating uncertainty, and professional identity formation., Conclusions: A standardized complex care curriculum delivered in a classroom setting did not lead to improved performance in an OSCE station despite increased resident-reported self-efficacy in approaching care for CMC. These findings highlight the need for multidimensional educational interventions and assessments in complex care., (Copyright © 2019 Academic Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Technological and medical advances have led to a growing population of children with medical complexity (CMC) defined by substantial medical needs, healthcare utilisation and morbidity. These children are at a high risk of missed, fragmented and/or inappropriate care, and families bear extraordinary financial burden and stress. While small in number (<1% of children), this group uses ~1/3 of all child healthcare resources, and need coordinated care to optimise their health. Complex care for kids Ontario (CCKO) brings researchers, families and healthcare providers together to develop, implement and evaluate a population-level roll-out of care for CMC in Ontario, Canada through a randomised controlled trial (RCT) design. The intervention includes dedicated key workers and the utilisation of coordinated shared care plans., Methods and Analysis: Our primary objective is to evaluate the CCKO intervention using a randomised waitlist control design. The waitlist approach involves rolling out an intervention over time, whereby all participants are randomised into two groups (A and B) to receive the intervention at different time points determined at random. Baseline measurements are collected at month 0, and groups A and B are compared at months 6 and 12. The primary outcome is the family-prioritized Family Experiences with Coordination of Care (FECC) survey at 12 months. The FECC will be compared between groups using an analysis of covariance with the corresponding baseline score as the covariate. Secondary outcomes include reports of child and parent health outcomes, health system utilisation and process outcomes., Ethics and Dissemination: Research ethics approval has been obtained for this multicentre RCT. This trial will assess the effect of a large population-level complex care intervention to determine whether dedicated key workers and coordinated care plans have an impact on improving service delivery and quality of life for CMC and their families., Trial Registration Number: NCT02928757., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)