Search

• 107 adults with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) received intravenous (IV) ketamine during the COVID-19 pandemic. • Compared to 160 adults who were treated in a time-matched period from 2019 to 2020, improvements in depressive symptoms, suicidality, anxiety, and functioning did not significantly differ. • Treatment response did not appear to be associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, despite possible increased loneliness and social isolation. Herein we evaluate the impact of COVID-19 restrictions on antidepressant effectiveness of intravenous (IV) ketamine in adults with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). We conducted a case series analysis of adults with TRD (n = 267) who received four ketamine infusions at an outpatient clinic in Ontario, Canada, during COVID-19 restrictions (from March 2020 - February 2021; n = 107), compared to patients who received treatment in the previous year (March 2019 - February 2020; n = 160). Both groups experienced significant and comparable improvements in depressive symptoms, suicidal ideation, and anxiety with repeated ketamine infusions. Effectiveness of IV ketamine was not attenuated during the COVID-19 period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antidepressant pharmacotherapy dominates current treatment in psychiatry, including treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the current trial-and-error process of medication selection contributes to treatment failure and unnecessarily exposes patients to lengthy and insufficient treatment trials. Notably, improvements in measures of cognition have been demonstrated to occur early during treatment and prior to improvements in clinical state. Cognitions have been categorized based on emotional valence (i.e., cold versus hot cognitions). Cold cognitions describe cognitive operations that are relevant to the processing of non-emotional information. The current analysis investigates whether early changes in cold cognition can predict response after 8 weeks of vortioxetine treatment in adults with MDD. This was secondary analysis of an 8-week, open-label study. Cognition was assessed at week 0 and week 2 to measure early cognitive change. Depressive symptom severity was assessed at week 0 and week 8 to measure treatment response. Eighty-one subjects were analyzed using binomial logistic regression models. Early change in cognition was a non-significant predictor of response (p = 0.845, SE = 0.599, OR = 1.124), which may have resulted from high data variability. The overall predictive accuracy of the model was low (sensitivity = 37.5%, specificity = 89.8%, PPV = 70.6%, NPV = 68.8%). Future studies should include larger samples and stratify patients based on potentially moderating variables, such as baseline cognitive impairment and occupation. Stratification would likely produce more homogenous samples, reducing the amount of variability observed for early cognitive change., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Roger S. McIntyre is a consultant to speak on behalf for, and/or has received research support from Lundbeck, Janssen, Shire, Purdue, Pfizer, Otsuka, Allergan, Takeda, Neurocrine, Sunovion, Stanley Medical Research Institute, and CIHR/GACD/Chinese National Natural Research Foundation. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)