Search

Background: University-community partnerships are a common strategy used in implementing community-based health promotion trials, yet few published studies report these interactions in detail. "Baby Smiles" was a five-year intervention study in Oregon, USA. The study involved 400 low-income women during and after pregnancy across four rural counties. In this report, we describe and assess four university-community health partnerships formed to support the intervention., Methods: A community health partnership advisory group for the study was established in each of the four participating counties. Group membership ranged from 9 to 23 individuals. A survey was administered to the groups five times in a 2.5 year period. The survey asked members' opinions of the intervention's goals, scientific basis and relevance to their organisation. Questions also asked about members' knowledge of oral health, beliefs about access to dental care for low-income pregnant women and children in their county and how their organisation functioned., Results: There was strong overall support by each partnership group despite differences in the groups' structure, foci and turnover in membership during intervention period. Responses to specific survey items indicating misinformation or negative opinions about oral health care were used to address weaknesses in study implementation throughout the conduct of the study., Conclusion: Systematic monitoring of community support for a multi-year oral health intervention is feasible and can identify potential barriers to address while the study is underway.

Background: Shifts in payment options for dental care over several decades have resulted in more dental expenditures being paid through health maintenance organizations (HMOs), preferred provider organizations (PPOs), and capitation arrangements. Patients' and employers' choices to participate in these arrangements is determined in part by dentists' willingness to participate in plans, and plan choices may be influenced by patient satisfaction, self-reported oral health, and/or quality or cost of care., Objectives: This study examined determinants of dentists' decisions to accept capitation payment for services., Research Design: Cross-sectional mail survey in December 2006., Subjects: 1605 general dentists in Oregon., Measures: Questions addressed dentists' perceptions of the importance of control over various practice parameters, willingness to accept capitation payment, employment or ownership status within the practice, and practice characteristics., Results: Capitation was accepted by 22.6% of the respondent dentists (n = 729). Reported average fees (2007 dollars) ranged from $60 (initial oral examination) to approximately $800 (porcelain crowns). The likelihood of accepting capitation payment was related to the number of dentists in the practice, but surprisingly owner-dentists were no less likely than employee-dentists (associates) to accept capitation. As expected, dentists' usual and customary fees were negatively associated with accepting capitation. In contrast, measures of dentists' importance of control were not related to decisions about capitation. Longer average appointment delays were related to acceptance of capitation, but the effects were small., Conclusions: Dentists' behavior regarding payment acceptance is generally consistent with microeconomic theory of provider behavior. Study findings should inform practitioners, plan managers, and researchers in examining dentist payment decisions.