Search

Background: Using the pencil beam raster scanning method employed at most carbon beam treatment facilities, spots can be moved without interrupting the beam, allowing for the delivery of a dose between spots (move dose). This technique is also known as Dose‐Driven‐Continuous‐Scanning (DDCS). To minimize its impact on HIMAK patient dosimetry, there's an upper limit to the move dose. Spots within a layer are grouped into sets, or "break points," allowing continuous irradiation. The beam is turned off when transitioning between sets or at the end of a treatment layer or spill. The control system beam‐off is accomplished by turning off the RF Knockout (RFKO) extraction and after a brief delay the High Speed Steering Magnet (HSST) redirects the beam transport away from isocenter to a beam dump. Purpose: The influence of the move dose and beam on/off control on the dose distribution and irradiation time was evaluated by measurements never before reported and modelled for Hitachi Carbon DDCS. Method: We conducted fixed‐point and scanning irradiation experiments at three different energies, both with and without breakpoints. For fixed‐point irradiation, we utilized a 2D array detector and an oscilloscope to measure beam intensity over time. The oscilloscope data enabled us to confirm beam‐off and beam‐on timing due to breakpoints, as well as the relative timing of the RFKO signal, HSST signal, and dose monitor (DM) signals. From these measurements, we analyzed and modelled the temporal characteristics of the beam intensity. We also developed a model for the spot shape and amplitude at isocenter occurring after the beam‐off signal which we called flap dose and its dependence on beam intensity. In the case of scanning irradiation, we measured move doses using the 2D array detector and compared these measurements with our model. Result: We observed that the most dominant time variation of the beam intensity was at 1 kHz and its harmonic frequencies. Our findings revealed that the derived beam intensity cannot reach the preset beam intensity when each spot belongs to different breakpoints. The beam‐off time due to breakpoints was approximately 100 ms, while the beam rise time and fall time (tdecay) were remarkably fast, about 10 ms and 0.2 ms, respectively. Moreover, we measured the time lag (tdelay) of approximately 0.2 ms between the RFKO and HSST signals. Since tdelay ≈ tdecay at HIMAK then the HSST is activated after the residual beam intensity, resulting in essentially zero flap dose at isocenter from the HSST. Our measurements of the move dose demonstrated excellent agreement with the modelled move dose. Conclusion: We conducted the first move dose measurement for a Hitachi Carbon synchrotron, and our findings, considering beam on/off control details, indicate that Hitachi's carbon synchrotron provides a stable beam at HIMAK. Our work suggests that measuring both move dose and flap dose should be part of the commissioning process and possibly using our model in the Treatment Planning System (TPS) for new facilities with treatment delivery control systems with higher beam intensities and faster beam‐off control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]