Search

Background: In recent decades, the incidence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) gram-negative (GN) bacteria has increased progressively among lung transplantation (LT) recipients. A prompt diagnosis, prevention, and management of these pathogens remain the cornerstone for successful organ transplantation.Research Question: What are the incidence of MDR and ESBL GN bacteria within the first 30 days after LT and related risk of in-hospital mortality? What are the potential clinical predictors of isolation of MDR and ESBL GN bacteria?Study Design and Methods: All consecutive LT recipients admitted to the ICU of the University Hospital of Padua (February 2016-December 2021) were screened retrospectively. Only adult patients undergoing the first bilateral LT and not requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or both before surgery were included. MDR and ESBL GN bacteria were identified using in vitro susceptibility tests and were isolated from the respiratory tract, blood, urine, rectal swab, or surgical wound or drainage according to a routine protocol.Results: One hundred fifty-three LT recipients were screened, and 132 were considered for analysis. Median age was 52 years (interquartile range, 41-60 years) and 46 patients (35%) were women. MDR and ESBL GN bacteria were identified in 45 patients (34%), and 60% of patients demonstrated clinically relevant infection. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 22 [49%]) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 17 [38%]) were frequently isolated after LT from the respiratory tract (n = 21 [47%]) and multiple sites (n = 18 [40%]). Previous recipient-related colonization (hazard ratio [HR], 2.48 [95% CI, 1.04-5.90]; P = .04) and empirical exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics (HR, 6.94 [95% CI, 2.93-16.46]; P < .01) were independent predictors of isolation of MDR and ESBL GN bacteria. In-hospital mortality of the MDR and ESBL group was 27% (HR, 6.38 [95% CI, 1.98-20.63]; P < .01).Interpretation: The incidence of MDR and ESBL GN bacteria after LT was 34%, and in-hospital mortality was six times greater. Previous recipient-related colonization and empirical exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics were clinical predictors of isolation of MDR and ESBL GN bacteria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intraoperative veno-arterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as intraoperative hemodynamic support during lung transplantation is becoming a standard practice due to promising clinical results. Nevertheless, studies on tissue/molecular pathways investigating ischemia/reperfusion injury are still lacking. Patients receiving a bilateral lung transplantation between January 2012 and December 2018 at the University Hospital of Padova were included in this retrospective single-center observational study. The present study aimed to investigate ischemia/reperfusion injury in 51 tissue specimens obtained from 13 recipients supported by intraoperative VA-ECMO and 38 who were not. Several tissue analyses, including apoptosis evaluation and inducible nitric oxide synthase expression, were performed on the biopsies at the time of transplantation. Lung samples from the ECMO group (both pre- and post-reperfusion) were comparable, or for some parameters better, than samples from the non-ECMO group. Leukocyte margination was significantly lower in the ECMO group than in the non-ECMO group. Primary graft dysfunction, mainly at 24 and 48 h, was correlated with the tissue injury score of the post-reperfusion biopsy. The interquartile ranges for all morphological parameters showed high grade variability between pre- and post-reperfusion in the non-ECMO group. These preliminary data support the use of intraoperative ECMO based on lower lung tissue ischemia/reperfusion injury. Larger case series are mandatory to confirm our findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The role of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for oncological major pulmonary resections is now well established; however, the literature within pulmonary re-operations is still limited. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of redo thoracoscopic resections for ipsilateral pulmonary malignancy. Data from patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery at the Unit of Thoracic Surgery of Padua were analyzed, comparing the results between the first and second ipsilateral surgery. The retrospective study included patients who underwent 2 thoracoscopic surgeries for oncological reasons between 2015 and 2022. The variables considered included patients' baseline characteristics, pre, intra, and postoperative data. The study enrolled 51 patients undergoing ipsilateral thoracoscopic re-operation. The statistical analysis showed that surgical time (95min vs 115min; p = 0.009), the presence of intrapleural adhesions at second surgery (30 % vs 76 %; p < 0.001), overall pleural fluid output (200 vs 560 ml; p = 0.003), time with pleural drainage (2 vs 3 days; p = 0.027), air leaks duration time (p = 0.004) and post-operative day of discharge (3 vs 4 days; p = 0.043) were significantly higher in the re-operation group. No statistical differences were observed between the 2 groups respect to R0 resection rate (90.2 % vs 89.1 %; p=>0.9) and complications (5.8 % vs 15.6 %; p = 0.11). The conversion rate to open surgery was 11.8 %. Although some differences emerged between the first and second intervention, they had minimal impact on the clinical course of the patients. Therefore, thoracoscopic surgery has been shown to be safe and effective in re-operations with satisfying perioperative outcomes. To achieve such results, these procedures should be reserved for experienced surgeons. • VATS represents the gold standard to surgical address most oncological lung resections. • However, the role of VATS for redo surgery is still controversial. • This study compared the outcomes of patients who underwent 2 VATS surgeries. • This study confirms that VATS is feasible, safe, and effective even in redo surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]