Search

Surveillance and detection of polioviruses (PV) remain crucial to monitoring eradication progress. Intratypic differentiation (ITD) using the real-time RT-PCR kit is key to the surveillance workflow, where viruses are screened after cell culture isolation before a subset are verified by sequencing. The ITD kit is a series of real-time RT-PCR assays that screens cytopathic effect (CPE)-positive cell cultures using the standard WHO method for virus isolation. Because ITD screening is a critical procedure in the poliovirus identification workflow, validation of performance of real-time PCR platforms is a core requirement for the detection of poliovirus using the ITD kit. In addition, the continual update and improvement of the ITD assays to simplify interpretation in all platforms is necessary to ensure that all real-time machines are capable of detecting positive real-time signals. Four platforms (ABI7500 real-time systems, Bio-Rad CFX96, Stratagene MX3000P, and the Qiagen Rotor-Gene Q) were validated with the ITD kit and a redesigned poliovirus probe. The poliovirus probe in the real-time RT-PCR pan-poliovirus (PanPV) assay was re-designed with a double-quencher (Zen™) to reduce background fluorescence and potential false negatives. The updated PanPV probe was evaluated with a panel consisting of 184 polioviruses and non-polio enteroviruses. To further validate the updated PanPV probe, the new assay was pilot tested in five Global Polio Laboratory Network (GPLN) laboratories (Madagascar, India, Philippines, Pakistan, and Democratic Republic of Congo). The updated PanPV probe performance was shown to reduce background fluorescence and decrease the number of false positives compared to the standard PanPV probe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antiviral susceptibility screening of avian influenza (AI) H9N2 viruses is crucial considering their role at the animal-human interface and potential to cause human infections. The Matrix 2 (M2) inhibitors (amantadine and rimantadine) have been used for prophylaxis and treatment of influenza A virus infections, however, resistance to these drugs has been widely reported. Information about amantadine susceptibility of H9N2 viruses from India is scanty. Matrix genes of 48H9N2 viruses isolated from India during 2009–2017 were sequenced and M2 trans-membrane region sequences were screened for mutations which are known to confer resistance to amantadine namely, L26F, V27A, A30 T/V, S31N and G34E. All the viruses isolated during the year 2009 were sensitive to amantadine. However, resistance started to appear since the year 2010 and all the viruses isolated from the year 2015 onwards showed presence of molecular markers conferring resistance to amantadine. Majority of the resistant viruses exhibited S31 N mutation. Four isolates showed presence of V27A + S31 N dual mutations. Comparison of the M2 sequences from other Asian countries showed different patterns of amantadine resistance wherein phylogenetic analysis of the M genes of the strains from Pakistan formed a separate cluster. In conclusion, the present study reports prevalence and gradual increase of amantadine resistance among AI H9N2 viruses in India, emphasizing the importance of the antiviral surveillance. • Amantadine resistance mutations in avian influenza H9N2 reported worldwide. • Reports on H9N2 amantadine susceptibility from India are scanty. • H9N2 isolates from India from 2009 to 2017 were screened for resistance markers. • All viruses from the year 2015 onwards showed amantadine resistance markers. • Highlights importance of antiviral surveillance of avian influenza. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]