Search

Background: Some studies have demonstrated an association between poor continuity of care, high likelihood of 'inappropriate' use of emergency departments (EDs) and avoidable hospitalization. However, we lack data concerning primary care use after an ED visit., Objective: Identify the determinants of a visit to the general practitioner (GP) after an ED visit.Methods., Design: Observational study (single-centre cohort)., Setting: One emergency department in Paris, France., Subjects: All adult patients who presented at the ED and were discharged., Main Outcome Measure: We collected data by the use of a standardized questionnaire, patients' medical records and a telephonic follow-up. Descriptive analyses were performed to compare individuals with and without a GP. Then, for those with a GP, multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the determinants of the GP consultation., Results: We included 243 patients (mean age 45 years [±19]); 211 (87%) reported having a GP. Among those who reported having a GP, 52% had consulted their GP after the ED visit. Not having a GP was associated with young age, not having complementary health insurance coverage, and being single. GP consultation was associated with increasing age [adjusted odds ratios (aOR) = 1.03], poor self-reported health status (aOR = 2.25), medical complaints versus traumatic injuries (aOR = 2.24) and prescription for sick note (aOR = 5.74)., Conclusion: Not having a GP was associated with factors of social vulnerability such as not having complementary health insurance coverage. For patients with a GP, consultation in the month after an ED visit seems appropriate, because it was associated with poor health status and medical complaints., (© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The present study aimed to assess socioeconomic inequalities in general and mental health, depression and substance use disorders (daily tobacco use, hazardous alcohol use). Data from the 2010 SIRS (French acronym for Health, Inequalities, and Social Ruptures) study, which is deemed to be representative of the French-speaking adult population living in the Paris Metropolitan Area, were analysed. Different socioeconomic position indicators were selected: education, income and perceived financial status. Absolute measures (the slope index of inequality (SII)) and relative measures (the odds ratio (OR) and relative index of inequality (RII)) of health inequalities were used. The OR, RII and SII were adjusted for age, household type and migration characteristics and all analyses were performed separately for men and women. The study included 3,006 adults. The results showed significant relative and absolute socioeconomic inequalities in general, mental health and depression for all socioeconomic position indicators considered (education, income, and perceived financial status). The absolute inequalities were greater for women than for men. Strongest inequalities were observed by perceived financial status for men and women. Education seemed to play a stronger role in inequalities for women, whereas, for men, income seemed to play a stronger role. Only few socioeconomic inequalities were found in daily tobacco use, while a reversed gradient was observed for hazardous alcohol use. We hope that these results will be regularly re-evaluated and compared across time in order to monitor socioeconomic inequalities in health., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.