Search

Objective  This study was aimed to present the complete removal of a large recurrent Meckel's cave meningioma. Design  This study is a case report. Setting  The study was conducted at Department of Neurosurgery and Skull Base Laboratory at Lariboisiére Hospital, Paris. Participant  A 53-year-old male was presented with a severe V1, V2, and V3 hypoesthesia and pain. He was operated 7 years ago for a right Meckel's cave meningioma with postoperative V1–V2 hypoesthesia. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a large tumor recurrence extending into the cavernous sinus (CS), posterior fossa (PF), sphenoid sinus (SS), pterygopalatine (PPF), and infratemporal fossa (ITF; Fig. 1). Main Outcome Measures  Radiological results and postoperative course were assessed for this study. Results  The previous right frontotemporal approach was used. The lateral wall of the orbit, the middle fossa floor and the anterior temporal base were drilled to expose the orbit, PPF, and ITF. Foramen ovale (FO), foramen rotondum (FR), and superior orbital fissure (SOF) were opened. The meningoorbital band was cut and the lateral wall of CS was elevated (Fig. 2). The inferior orbital fissure was opened and tumor removed into the ITF, PPF, and orbit. After entering Meckel's cave from above, tumor was removed from PF. After microsurgical tumor removal, a 45-degree endoscope was used to remove tumor remnant and mucosa into SS. A watertight dural closure with pericranium was performed, reinforced with autologous fat and fibrin glue. Postoperative MRI showed complete tumor resection (Fig. 1). The patient experienced a right-side keratitis that resolved within 10 days and a V3 hypoesthesia that improved at 2 months. Conclusion  This surgical case shows how the anatomical knowledge is mandatory in skull base surgery and how the integration of microsurgical and endoscopic-assisted techniques allows to obtain optimal results. The link to the video can be found at: https://youtu.be/qxt_389AdWU. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess the feasibility of awake surgery for a brain tumor in a population of non-French-speaking migrants in Paris, France. Methods: The Lariboisière database of awake surgeries was retrospectively reviewed, from the first case in 2011 up to July 2018. Inclusion criteria were patients being migrated in France during their adulthood, patients being unable to speak neither French nor English. Clinical and radiological data were collected from the electronic medical charts. Results: Five patients fulfilled inclusion criteria. Pathological diagnosis included three glioma, one meningioma, and one melanoma metastasis. The standard awake protocol of our center was followed as usual, with the additional involvement of an interpreter at each step. In the five cases, the awake procedure allowed the surgeon to tailor the resection according to functional boundaries. Resections were complete in three cases and subtotal in two cases. No neurological deficits were observed. All patients returned to their preoperative socio-professional status. Conclusions: Awake surgery for a brain tumor can be offered to migrants, in spite of the poor verbal communication between the patient and the caring staff. A team dedicated to awake surgery and including an interpreter is the key to successfully overcome the language barrier, before, during, and after the surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]